Outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in arthritis using functional knee score


  • Arvind B. Goregaonkar Department of Orthopaedics, LTMMC&GH, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Hitesh A. Shukla Department of Orthopaedics, LTMMC&GH, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Amit Singh Department of Orthopaedics, LTMMC&GH, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Santosh Bindumadhavan Department of Orthopaedics, LTMMC&GH, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Rajesh S. Department of Orthopaedics, LTMMC&GH, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India




Total knee arthroplasty, Midvastus, Knee society functional score


Background: Knee being a major weight bearing joint, arthritis of the knee is a common problem. Over time various conservative measures have been used to alleviate the arthritic pain, but complete pain relief has rarely been achieved. Total Knee Arthroplasty has an established place in the treatment of knee arthritis and is an effective surgical modality that provides immediate pain relief and enhances quality of life. Though most patients were satisfied by the immediate outcome of the surgery, further detailed interrogation revealed concern and inability to perform activities they previously used to do, thus arising the need for an objective method to measure the true outcome.

Methods: There are very few established objective scoring methods to evaluate the outcome following a Total Knee Arthroplasty. In our study, we have used the ‘Functional Knee Score’ for the 30 patients with arthritis who underwent TKA using the midvastus approach under tourniquet cover.

Results: The majority of the patients were from the age group of 61-70 years which accounts for 36.7% of patients in our study. The mean functional new knee society score preoperatively was 39.90 standard deviation of 3.055 which improved to 80.77 with standard deviation of 6.263 postoperatively, p<0.001.

Conclusions: Using knee society functional score, 10 patients had excellent results, 16 had a good result, 4 patients a had fair result.


Dieppe P, Basler HD, Chard J, Croft P, Dixon J, Hurley M, et al. Knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis: Effectiveness, practice variations, indications and possible determinants of utilization. Rheumatol. 1999;38(1):73-83.

Macaulay W, Geller JA, Brown AR, Cote LJ, Kiernan HA. Total knee arthroplasty and Parkinson disease: enhancing outcomes and avoiding complications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(11):687-94.

Clark CR, Rorabeck CH, MacDonald S, MacDonald D, Swafford J, Cleland D. Posterior-stabilised and cruciate-retaining total knee replacement – a randomized study. Clin Orthop 2001;392:208-12.

Wright G, Chitnavis J. Which design of TKR-does it matter? J Bone Joint Surg. (Br), 2011: 1-3.

Güçlü B, Güzel B, Başarir K, Erdemli B. Cetin Midterm results of total knee arthroplasty in degenerative knee joint diseases with severe deformity. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2008;42(1):1-9.

Shi MG, Lü HS, Guan ZP. Influence of preoperative range of motion on the early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty, Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006;44(16):1101-5.

Guan Z1, Lv H, Shi M. Early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty for flexion-contracture deformity knees of different degrees. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006;20(6):598-601.

Senan V, Nessiah S, Vikraman CS, Kumar M, Senan M. TKR: A clinical and functional outcome in chronic arthritic knees. Kerala J Orthopaed. 2011;24:23-6.






Original Research Articles