Comparison of postoperative outcomes between open surgical release and ultrasound guided percutaneous release of trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20260514

Keywords:

Trigger finger, A1 pulley release, Open release, Ultrasound guided release, Outcomes

Abstract

Trigger finger is a hand condition that can be treated surgically through an open procedure or ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous release. While similar techniques differ in invasiveness, recovery time, and complication rates, our research aims to compare the clinical outcomes of both techniques, focusing on pain relief, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Six reviewers screened titles and abstracts, resolving conflicts with a seventh, and assessed full texts for eligibility. Included studies involved adult patients treated surgically for trigger finger with reported postoperative outcomes. Data was extracted using a standardised sheet capturing study details, demographics, management approaches, outcomes, and statistical methods. Eleven studies comparing open and US-guided release were included. Pooled analysis of six studies showed no significant difference in postoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score [MD: 0.04 (-0.27, 0.34), p=0.80], with substantial heterogeneity (I²=74%). Q-DASH analysis from three studies also showed no significant difference in functional outcomes [MD:-0.06 (-2.24, 2.13), p=0.96], with heterogeneity (I²=79%) resolved through sensitivity analysis. Patient satisfaction was initially similar between groups, but after removing one study, open surgery showed significantly lower odds of satisfaction compared to US-guided release [OR: 0.23 (0.08, 0.64), p=0.005]. Our meta-analysis suggests that US-guided trigger finger release appears to provide similar pain relief and functional recovery as open surgery, with greater patient satisfaction. However, study heterogeneity calls for more high-quality research to confirm these findings.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Donati D, Ricci V, Boccolari P, Flavio O, Fabio V, Ondřej N, et al. From diagnosis to rehabilitation of trigger finger: a narrative review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):1061-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08192-5

Makkouk AH, Oetgen ME, Swigart CR, Dodds SD. Trigger finger: etiology, evaluation, and treatment. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008;1(2):92-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-007-9012-1

Welman T, Young K, Larkin J, Maxim DH. Trigger finger from ocean rowing: an observational study. Hand (N Y). 2022;17(2):254-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944720918321

Patrinely JR, Johnson SP, Drolet BC. Trigger finger corticosteroid injection with and without local anesthetic: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Hand (N Y). 2021;16:619-623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944719884663

Ferrara PE, Codazza S, Maccauro G, Gianfranco Z, Giorgio F, Gianpaolo R. Physical therapies for the conservative treatment of the trigger finger: a narrative review. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2020;12(1):8680-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8680

Lewis J, Seidel H, Shi L, Jennifer W, Jason S. National benchmarks for the efficacy of trigger finger and the risk factors associated with failure. JAAOS Glob Res Rev. 2023;7(2):e22.00198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00198

Saito T, Nakamichi R, Nakahara R, Keiichiro N, Toshifumi O. The effectiveness of rehabilitation after open surgical release for trigger finger: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(22):7187-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227187

Atthakomol P, Manosroi W, Sathiraleela K, Nutthapong T, Treephum D, Atithep T, et al. Prognostic factors related to recurrence of trigger finger after open surgical release in adults. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023;83:352-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.05.008

Cromheecke M, Bogaert S, Dejonghe M, De Keyzer PB, Mares O, Goubau J, et al. Ultrasound-guided trigger finger release with a minimally invasive knife: a retrospective analysis of 297 releases. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2025;44:102081-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2025.102081

Nikolaou VS, Malahias MA, Kaseta MK, Ioannis S, George CB. Comparative clinical study of ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release vs open surgical intervention in the treatment of trigger finger. World J Orthop. 2017;8(2):163-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i2.163

Yavari M, Modaresi SM, Hassanpour SE, Seyed MM, Ali T. Clinical study between percutaneous ultrasound-guided release and open classic surgery in treating multiple trigger fingers. Adv Biomed Res. 2023;12:88-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_392_21

Muramatsu K, Rayel MF, Arcinue J. A comparison of blinded versus ultrasound-guided limited-open trigger finger release using the Yasunaga knife. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2022;27:124-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835522500096

Lin CJ, Huang HK, Wang ST, Yi-Chao H, Chien-Lin L, Jung-Pan W. Open versus percutaneous release for trigger digits: reversal between short-term and long-term outcomes. J Chin Med Assoc. 2016;79(6):340-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2016.01.009

Downloads

Published

2026-02-24

How to Cite

Sandaqji, D. O., Alzahrani, I. A., Alharbi, S. S., Almasoud, S. H., AlMutairi, L. O., Alreshidi, N. O., & Ghalimah, B. A. (2026). Comparison of postoperative outcomes between open surgical release and ultrasound guided percutaneous release of trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 12(2), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20260514

Issue

Section

Meta-Analysis