An observational retrospective study on safety and functional outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Sironix suture button and interference screw
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20234038Keywords:
ACL injury, ACL-R, IKDC, Interference screw, Sironix suture buttonAbstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a persistent orthopaedic condition that affects a wide spectrum of people. ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) stands out as the primary treatment option. Graft fixation with suture buttons and interference screws has proven to be a highly successful and reliable method for ACL-R. In this context, our research aims to assess the safety and functional outcomes of patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL-R using the Sironix suture button and interference screw.
Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL-R using Sironix suture button and interference screw (January 2018-March 2022) were included in the study. Functional outcomes of patients were evaluated using the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) assessment, the Tegner activity scale (TAS), the Lysholm knee scoring scale, the modified knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) quality of life subscale, and the single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE) score. Adverse events, if any, were recorded.
Results: All patients achieved excellent outcome measures for IKDC, Tegner, Lysholm, KOOS, and SANE scores. The mean (SD) IKDC score was 88.76 (7.16), Tegner activity score was 5.9 (1.13), while the Lysholm score was 96.9 (6.56). The overall KOOS score was 93.7 (7.52), and the overall SANE score for the affected joint was 94.5 (7.22).
Conclusions: Arthroscopic ACL-R using Sironix implants (Helysis titanium interference screw, Helysis PLDLA+β-TCP interference screw, Infiloop fixed loop UHMWPE suture titanium button, Proloop adjustable loop UHMWPE suture Titanium button, and Titanium suture disc) demonstrated safety and good functional outcomes.
References
Diermeier T, Rothrauff BB, Engebretsen L, Lynch AD, Ayeni OR, Paterno MV, Xerogeanes JW et al. Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group. Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc. 2020;28(8):2390-402.
Yoo H, Marappa-Ganeshan R. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb, Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
Sharma P, Baghel A, Keshav K, Kumar A, Singh A, Singh AB. Functional Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Titanium Adjustable Loop Button and Poly-L-co-DL-Lactic Acid-Beta Tricalcium Phosphate (PLDLA-bTCP) Interference Screws: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Observational Study. Cureus. 2023;15(2):e34542.
Mlv SK, Mahmood A, Vatsya P, Garika SS, Mittal R, Nagar M. Demographic characteristics of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at a tertiary care hospital in India. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11(15):3464-70.
Krause M, Freudenthaler F, Frosch KH, Achtnich A, Petersen W, Akoto R. Operative Versus Conservative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture. DtschArztebl Int. 2018;115(51-52):855-62.
Chechik O, Amar E, Khashan M, Lador R, Eyal G, Gold A. An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices. Int Orthop. 2013;37:201-6.
Rodriguez K, Soni M, Joshi PK, Patel SC, Shreya D, Zamora DI, Patel GS et al. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment. Cureus. 2021;13(12):e20206.
Wilde J, Bedi A, Altchek DW. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Heal. 2014;6(6):504-18.
Liechti DJ, Chahla J, Chase S, Mitchell JJ, Sette E, Menge TJ, LaPrade RF. “Outcomes and Risk Factors of Rerevision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.” Arthroscopy. 2016;32(10):2151-9.
Longo UG, Nagai K, Salvatore G, Cella E, Candela V, Cappelli F, Ciccozzi M et al. Epidemiology of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery in Italy: A 15-Year Nationwide Registry Study. J Clin Med. 2021;10(2):223.
Sun J, Wei XC, Li L, Cao XM, Li K, Guo L, Lu JG et al. “Autografts vs Synthetics for Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Orthop Surg. 2020;12(2):378-87.
Buerba RA, Boden SA, Lesniak B. Graft Selection in Contemporary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Am AcadOrthopSurg Glob Res Rev. 2021;5(10):e21.00230.
Vaishya R, Agarwal A, Ingole S, Vijay V. Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review. Cureus. 2015;7(11): e378.
Lee DW, Lee JW, Kim SB, Park JH, Chung KS, Ha JK, Kim JG et al. Comparison of Poly-L-Lactic Acid and Poly-L-Lactic Acid/Hydroxyapatite Bioabsorbable Screws for Tibial Fixation in ACL Reconstruction: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017;9(3):270-9.
Pereira H, Correlo VM, Silva-Correia J, Oliveira JM, Reis RL, Espregueira-Mendes J. Migration of "bioabsorbable" screws in ACL repair. How much do we know? A systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Artosc. 2013;21(4):986-94.
Mortazavi SMJ, Hasani SS, Vosoughi F, Rezaei Dogahe R, Besharaty S. Arthroscopic Fixation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fracture Using FiberWire Suture With Suture Disc. Arthrosc Tech. 2021;10(7):e1709-15.
Ohnishi Y, Chang A, Utsunomiya H, Suzuki H, Nakamura E, Sakai A, Uchida S. “Arthroscopic Technique to Reduce Suture Button Migration During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedure.” Arthroscopy Techn. 2017;6(5):e1927-31.
Sundaraj K, Salmon LJ, Heath EL, Winalski CS, Colak C, Vasanji A, Roe JP et al. Bioabsorbable Versus Titanium Screws in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial With 13-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(6):1316-26.
Papalia R, Vasta S, D'Adamio S, Giacalone A, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Metallic or bioabsorbable interference screw for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction? Br Med Bull. 2014;109:19-29.
Shervegar S, Nagaraj P, Grover A, Dj NG, Ravoof A. Functional Outcome Following Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction with Rigid Fix: A Retrospective Observational Study. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015;3(4):264-8.
Chitten JJ, Arora M. A Prospective Observational Study on Short-Term Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair of Proximal Tears Using Knotless Single Suture Anchor Technique. Indian J Orthop. 2021;56(3):437-44.
Ra HJ, Kim HS, Choi JY, Ha JK, Kim JY, Kim JG. Comparison of the ceiling effect in the Lysholm score and the IKDC subjective score for assessing functional outcome after ACL reconstruction. Knee. 2014;21(5):906-10.
Cheng-Yao L, Chuan-Dong L, Liang W, Shan R, Fu-Bin Y, Jin-Guang, Jiang-Xiong M. Function scores of different surgeries in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A prisma-compliant systematic review and network-meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018;97(21):e10828.
Muller B, Yabroudi MA, Lynch A, Lai CL, Van DCN, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ. “Defining Thresholds for the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the IKDC Subjective Knee Form and KOOS for Patients Who Underwent ACL Reconstruction.” The American journal of sports med. 2016;44(11):2820-6.
Chen K, Zhu W, Zheng Y, Zhang F, Ouyang K, Peng L, Liu H et al. A retrospective study to compare the clinical effects of individualized anatomic single-and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14712.
Douoguih WA, Zade RT, Bodendorfer BM, Siddiqui Y, Lincoln AE. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair with Suture Augmentation for Proximal Avulsion Injuries. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020;2(5):e475-80.