Comparative study between delto-pectoral and deltoid splitting approach in surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures using philos plating

Authors

  • Harpreet Singh Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3130-2832
  • Kamal K. Agarwal Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Meet Patel Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Prashant Makadia Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Pranjal Jain Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Bineet Oza Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20221126

Keywords:

Humerus fracture, PHILOS, Humerus, ORIF humerus

Abstract

Background: The present study was done to compare the two approaches of proximal humerus PHILOS plating on the basis of functional outcome of patients and other perioperative parameters.

Methods: 40 patients with type 2 and type 3 proximal humerus were assigned to group A and B pre-operatively using random alternate allocation. Patients in group-A were operated with deltoid splitting approach while patients in group-B were operated with delto-pectoral approach. Functional outcome was assessed at 6 weeks, 3-months and 6-months. Perioperative parameters like duration of surgery, associated complications, and hospital stay were also noted and compared.

Results: In each group, there were 12 two-part fractures and 8 three-part fractures. For 2-part fractures the mean duration of surgery was 51.33 min for group A and 63.37 min for group B. While for 3-part fractures it was 67.5 min and 80 min respectively. Irrespective of fracture type, there was statistically significant difference between the constant scores in both groups at 3 months (2-part: group A: 67.67; group B: 44.7; p value=0.001. 3-part: group A: 66; group B: 48; p value=0.001). However, the difference between two groups at 6 months was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Both approaches show satisfactory outcomes over a long period. However, the significantly less operative time and minimal soft tissue dissection in deltoid splitting approach can be used as an advantage in particular cases. Moreover, there was an early return to day-to-day activities for the deltoid splitting group which should be considered when treating an active individual.

Author Biographies

Harpreet Singh, Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

Third Year Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, Ahmedabad

Kamal K. Agarwal, Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

Professor and head, Dept. of orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, India

Meet Patel, Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

Assistant Professor, Dept. of orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, India

Prashant Makadia, Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

Third year resident, Dept. of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, India

Pranjal Jain, Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

Third year resident, Dept. of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, India

Bineet Oza, Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

Third year resident, Dept. of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Udaipur, India

References

Baron JA, Barrett JA, Karagas MR. The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone. 1996;18(3):209-13.

Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(4):365-71.

Bell JE, Leung BC, Spratt KF, et al. Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(2):121–131.

Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The translated two-part fracture of the proximal humerus. Epidemiology and outcome in the older patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(6):799–804.

Bell JE, Leung BC, Spratt KF, et al. Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(2):121–131.

Patel RR, Patel NP, Nakum AN, Sabuwala SK. Proximal humerus fractures treated using deltoid splitting approach, Gujarat medical journal 2015;70(1):59-61.

Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Dines JS, et al. The extended anterolateral acromial approach allows minimally invasive access to the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(434):123–129.

Rouleau DM, Balg F, Benoit B, Leduc S, Malo M, Vézina F, Laflamme GY. Deltopectoral vs. deltoid split approach for proximal Humerus fracture fixation with locking plate: a prospective Randomized study (HURA). Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020 Nov 1;29(11):2190-9.

Korkmaz MF, Erdem MN, Karakaplan M, Gormelli G, Selcuk EB, Maras, Karatas T.Comparasion of lateral deltoid splitting and delto pectoral approaches in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures . Turkish journal of trauma and emergency surgery 2015; 21(2):113-18

Laflamme GY, Rouleau DM, Berry GK, Beaumont PH, Reindl R, Harvey EJ.Percutaneous humeral plating of fractures of the proximal humerus: results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2008 ;22(3):153-8.

Kohli S, Vishwakarma N, Chauhan S, Salgotr K, Jain S, Dumbre P, Tiwari A, Yadav A. Trans deltoid approach in proximal humerus fractures: Outcome in 35 cases and review of literature. Annals of international medical and dental research 2016;18-23.

Singh H, Batra A, Patel D. Lateral trans deltoid approach to proximal humerus fractures. International surgery journal 2015; 2 (3): 337-40.

Liu K1, Liu PC1, Liu R1, Wu X1. Advantage of minimally invasive lateral approach relative to conventional deltopectoral approach for treatment of proximal humerus fractures. 2015 15;21:496-504.

Papadopoulos P1, Karataglis D, Stavridis SI, Petsatodis G, Christodoulou. A Mid-term results of internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with the Philos plate. Injury. 2009;40(12):1292-6.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles