DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20214826
Published: 2021-12-24

A prospective analytical study on the effect of posterior femoral condylar offset on range of knee flexion in patients undergoing cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty

Ranjit Kumar G., Murukan Babu, Tom Jose

Abstract


Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) of knee joint is a common problem in our society causing pain, deformity, oedema, malalignment and limitation of activity. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the surgery done for treatment of this problem. The range of movement obtained after TKA is an important factor influencing success of surgery. Posterior femoral condylar offset (PCO) is one of the parameters influencing range of movement after surgery. The dearth of studies in Indian population and contradicting results in already conducted studies has been observed in assessing the effect of PCO on range of knee flexion in patients undergoing TKA. Hence this study is done to explore this correlation.

Methods: A prospective analytical study on 36 patients (50 knees) who underwent cruciate retaining TKA at Department of Orthopaedics, Rajagiri Hospital, Aluva. PCO and posterior femoral condylar offset ratio (PCOR) were calculated radiologically before and after TKA. Range of flexion (ROF) and knee society scores (for functional outcome assessment) were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively (at 6 weeks and 3 months).

Results: The study found a strong positive correlation between PCO difference and ROF difference (r=0.735). Strong positive correlation was also found between PCOR difference and ROF difference (r=0.777). Both these correlations were statistically significant (p<0.05).

Conclusions: The study enlightened us about the point that PCO is an important factor in attaining a good ROF after cruciate retaining TKA.


Keywords


PCO, PCOR, ROF, Maximum flexion angle, TKA

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1323-30.

Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494-502.

Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Mizuno K, Yamamoto T. Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the need and the pit falls. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4-1):59-62.

Farahini H, Moghtadaei M, Bagheri A, Akbarian E. Factors Influencing Range of Motion after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2012;14(7):417-21.

Kotani A, Yonekura A, Bourne RB. Factors influencing range of motion after contemporary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7):850-6.

Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(1):50-3.

Chambers AW, Wood AR, Kosmopoulos V, Sanchez HB, Wagner RA. Effect of Posterior Tibial Slope on Flexion and Anterior-Posterior Tibial Translation in Posterior Cruciate- Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(1):103-6.

Lützner J, Hartmann A, Lützner C, Kirschner S. Is range of motion after cruciate- retaining total knee arthroplasty influenced by prosthesis design? A prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(5):9615.

Sancheti KH, Sancheti PK, Shyam AK, Joshi R, Patil K, Jain A. Factors affecting range of motion in total knee arthroplasty using high flexion prosthesis: A prospective study. Indian J Orthop. 2013;47(1):50-6.

Nageswara RK, Harsha TSS. Determinants of range of motion in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. Int J Res Orthop. 2018;4(3):507-13.

Johal P, Hassaballa MA, Eldridge JD, Porteous AJ. The Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio. Knee. 2012;19(6):843-5.

Soda Y, Oishi J, Nakasa T, Nishikawa K, Ochi M. New parameter of flexion after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: posterior condylar offset ratio on X-ray photographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(3):167-70.

Malviya A, Lingard EA, Weir DJ, Deehan DJ. Predicting range of movement after knee replacement: the importance of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(5):491-8.

Arabori M, Matsui N, Kuroda R, Mizuno K, Doita M, Kurosaka M, et al. Posterior condylar offset and flexion in posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized TKA. J Orthop Sci. 2008;13(1):46-50.

Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M, Sato J, Toyabe S. Posterior condylar offset does not correlate with knee flexion after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(9):2995-3001.

Kwon SK, Jain NP, Kang JY, Kang YG, Kim TK. Influence of Posterior Condylar Offset on Maximal Flexion and Outcome Scales Following TKA in Asian Patients. Recon Rev. 2014;4(4):15.

Hemmerich A, Brown H, Smith S, Marthandam SSK, Wyss UP. Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics of high range of motion activities of daily living. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(4):770-81.

Zhou H, Liu A, Wang D, Zeng X, Wei S, Wang C. Kinematics of lower limbs of healthy Chinese people sitting cross-legged. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013;37(5):369-74.

Zhou H, Wang D, Liu T, Zeng X, Wang C. Kinematics of hip, knee, ankle of the young and elderly Chinese people during kneeling activity. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2012;13(10):831-8.

Almeida PH, Vilaça A. The posterior condylar offset ratio and femoral anatomy in anterior versus posterior referencing total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(6):687-91.

Kittanakere SR, Bhonsle RP, Kohli R, Daggubatti DK. Prospective study of posterior condylar offset ratio and its influence on maximal flexion angle of knee in posterior cruciate ligament substituting total knee arthroplasty. Int J Orthop Sci. 2018;4(1):450-5.

Massin P, Gournay A. Optimization of the Posterior Condylar Offset, Tibial Slope, and Condylar Roll-back in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(6):889-96.