Results of posterior decompression with non-instrumented lumbar fusion surgery in cases of degenerative lumbar canal stenosis presenting with neurogenic claudication in a tertiary care hospital


  • Maruti Bhujangrao Lingayat Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
  • Ansari Muqtadeer Abdul Aziz Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
  • Gaurav Balasaheb Mate Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
  • Sourabh Sahebrao Dhamale Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India



Degenerative lumbar canal stenosis, Posterior decompression, Non-instrumented fusion


Background: Degenerative lumbar canal stenosis remains an important public health problem in today’s date. With the overall average age of the world’s population rising steadily it is important to have an optimal treatment plan affordable to the masses. Non-instrumented fusion after decompression remains an important treatment option which is affordable to the masses and effectively treats the instability occurring due to degeneration process. This study aims to understand the results of such treatment in a tertiary care center catering to the masses.

Methods: The study was conducted in 34 patients with diagnosed degenerative lumbar canal stenosis with neurogenic claudication who underwent decompressive laminectomy with a posterolateral strut graft posterolateral fusion from July 2018 to August 2020. Each patient was followed up for 12 months.

Results: In the present study, a total of 34 patients with degenerative lumbar canal stenosis with neurogenic claudication were included. There were 18 male and 16 female patients. The pre-operative Swiss spinal stenosis Score was 61-80 (52.9%) and these scores improved to a majority of patients in the category of 21-40 (82.4%) at 1 year postoperatively. The average VAS score was 4.7±1.8 preoperatively while the average post op VAS score was 0.8±0.77.

Conclusions: Non-instrumented fusion of the vertebrae with decompression has significantly improved results at 1 year follow up postoperatively and it is an excellent easy and cost-effective technique if used in a properly selected patient. Further studies are required to assess its long-term results.


Wu A, March L, Zheng X, Huang J, Wang X, Zhao J, Blyth FM, Smith E, Buchbinder R, Hoy D. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(6):299.

Munakomi S, Foris LA, Varacallo M. Spinal Stenosis And Neurogenic Claudication. [Updated 2020 Jul 4]. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020.

Billy GG, Lemieux SK, Chow MX. Changes in Lumbar Disk Morphology Associated With Prolonged Sitting Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. PM&R, 2014;6:790-5.

Ishimoto Y, Cooper C, Ntani G. Factory and construction work is associated with an increased risk of severe lumbar spinal stenosis on MRI: A case control analysis within the wakayama spine study. Am J Ind Med. 2019;62:430-8.

Wu AM, Zou F, Cao Y, Xia DD, He W, Zhu B, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: an update on the epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. AME Med J. 2017;2:63.

Jackson RP, McManus AC, Moore J. Lumbar spinal stenosis: treatment options for an aging population. Mo Med. 2012;109(6):466-9.

Garfin SR, Fischgrund JS, Eismont FJ, Bono CM, Bell GR. Rothman-Simeone and Herkowitz‟s The Spine. Edn- Seventh, Elsevier, China, 2018, 1038- 1057.

Abou-Al-Shaar H, Adogwa O, Mehta AI. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Objective Measurement Scales and Ambulatory Status. Asian Spine J. 2018;12(4):765-74.

Pratt RK, Fairbank JC, Virr A. The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(1):84-91.

Comer CM, Conaghan, PG, FRACP, FRCP*,†; Tennant, Alan PhD. Internal Construct Validity of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, Spine. 2011;36(23):1969-76.

Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Hunter DJ. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J. 2009;9(7):545-50.

Prasad BC, Ramesh Chandra VV, Devi BV, Chivukula SS, Pundarikakshaiah K. Clinical, radiological, and functional evaluation of surgical treatment in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Neurol India. 2016;64(4):677-83.

Radcliff K, Hilibrand A, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Delasotta L, Rihn J, Zhao W, Vaccaro A, Albert TJ, Weinstein JN. The impact of epidural steroid injections on the outcomes of patients treated for lumbar disc herniation: a subgroup analysis of the SPORT trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(15):1353-8.






Original Research Articles