Anteromedial versus trans-tibial technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring graft: a comparative study


  • Barunkumar Singh Department of Orthopaedics, DDU Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Sharma Gaurav Department of Orthopaedics, Prakash Institute of Medical sciences, Islampur-Sangli Road, Tal-Walwa, Sangli, UrunIslampur, Maharashtra, India
  • Bhardwaj Akshay Department of Orthopaedics, DDU Hospital, New Delhi, India



Anterior cruciate ligament, Anteromedial, Trans-tibial, Arthroscopic reconstruction


Background: Femoral tunnel position plays a pivotal role for successful outcome in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgeries. Recently, the anteromedial techniques have gained popularity over the trans-tibial technique due to better anatomical position and better stability rotationally and antero-posteriorly then the later. The aim of the present study was to compare the technical difficulty and ease, functional and radiological outcome of trans-tibial and anteromedial portal techniques in ACL reconstruction.

Methods: Thirty patients between March 2015 and February 2016 with ACL tear underwent arthroscopic reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring graft and were divided into two groups A (anteromedial) and group B (trans-tibial) as per the technique used. Patients with multiligament injuries, revision surgeries, and osteoarthritis knee were excluded. All the patients were followed-up for 24 months and clinical Lysholm and IKDC scores along with radiological outcome were calculated.

Results: The mean age of patients were 32.4±6.3 years. Isolated ACL tear was seen in 16 (53.4%) cases followed by medial meniscus injury in 11 (36.6%) patients. The mean duration between injury and surgery was 14.8±8.99 and 21.6±3.23 days in group A and B respectively (p=0.0122). The radiological position of femoral tunnel in sagittal and coronal plane was statistically significant in both the groups. The Lysholm and IKDC scores showed statistically significant difference at 3 months post-operatively.

Conclusions: Anteromedial and trans-tibial techniques have similar long term functional outcomes. However, more anatomical position of the graft through the anteromedial technique and better rotational and anteroposterior stability makes it theoretically to be superior to the trans-tibial technique.


Kiapour AM, Murray MM. Basic science of anterior cruciate ligament injury and repair. Bone Joint Res. 2014;3(2):20–31.

Rezazadeh S, Ettehadi H, Vosoughi AR. Outcome of arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial portal technique versus transtibial drilling technique. Musculoskelet Surg. 2016;100(1):37-41.

Meighan AA, Keating JF, Will E. Outcome after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in athletic patients. A comparison of early versus delayed surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(4):521-4.

Sohn DH, Garrett WE Jr. Transitioning to anatomic anterior cruciate ligament graft placement. J Knee Surg. 2009;22:155–60.

Ruffilli A, Traina F, Evangelisti G, Borghi R, Perna F, Faldini C. Preservation of hamstring tibial insertion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of the current literature. MusculoskeletSurg. 2015;99(2):87–92.

Amis AA, Jakob RP. Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc.1998;6:S2–12.

Bedi A, Musahl V, Steuber V, Kendoff D, Choi D, Allen AA, et al. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(3):380-90.

Alentorn-Geli E, Samitier G, Alvarez P, Steinbacher G, Cugat R. Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two-to five-year follow-up. Int Orthop. 2010;34(5):747-54.

Robin BN, Jani SS, Marvil SC, Reid JB, Schillhammer CK, Lubowitz JH. Advantages and disadvantages of transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in femoral tunnel drilling in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(7):1412-7.

Silva A, Sampaio R, Pinto E. ACL reconstruction: comparison between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc. 2012;20(5):896–903.

Asagumo H, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Taki M, Takagishi K. Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using double-bundle hamstring tendons: surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(6):602–9.

Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey WG, Kocher MS, Steadman JR. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(5):890-7.

Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D, Ghodadra N, Marchant M, Pietrobon R, Cook C. International Knee Documentation Committee. Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74(6):594-9.

Ahn JH, JeongHJ, Ko CS, Ko TS, Kim JH. Three-di- mensional reconstruction computed tomography evaluation of tunnel location during single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques. ClinOrthopSurg. 2013;5(1):26–35.

Steiner ME. Surgical management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. In: McKeon BP, Bono JV, Richmond JC, eds. Knee arthroscopy. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2008: 129-52.

Lee JK, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC. Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction is possible with use of the modified transtibial technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(8):664-72.

Gavriilidis I, Motsis EK, Pakos EE, Georgoulis AD, Mitsionis G, Xenakis TA. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Knee. 2008;15(5):364–7.

Brown CH Jr, Spalding T, Robb C. Medial portal tech- nique for single-bundle anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. IntOrthop. 2013;37(2):253–69.

Sedeek SM, Andrew THC. Femoral tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial or transtibialportal? Current review. Hard Tissue. 2013;2(4):34.

Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL. Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(3):297–304. Mardani-Kivi M, Madadi F, Keyhani S, Karimi-Mobarake M, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Saheb-Ekhtiari K. Antero-medial portal vs. transtibial techniques for drilling femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction using 4-strand hamstring tendon: a cross- sectional study with 1-year follow-up. Med SciMonit. 2012;18(11):CR674-9.

Azboy I, Demirtas ̧ A, Gem M, Kıran S, Alemdar C, Bulut M. A comparison of the anteromedial and transtibial drilling technique in ACL reconstruction after a short-term follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(7):963–9.

Riboh JC, Hasselblad V, Godin JA, Mather RC. Transtibial versus independent drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review, meta- analysis, and meta-regression. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(11):2693–702.

Wei Z, Li F, Peng W, Wei B, Qiu L, Wei C. Comparative study on arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial technique and through anteromedial approach. ZhongguoXiu Fu Chong Jian WaiKeZaZhi 2014;28(3):339–44.






Original Research Articles