Open reduction internal fixation with triceps-sparing approach in distal humerus fracture: an experience from a tertiary level hospital in Mangalore
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20190803Keywords:
Intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus, Open reduction and internal fixation, Triceps-sparingAbstract
Background: Fractures of the distal humerus represent challenging problems to an orthopaedic surgeon. The present study aimed to assess the range of movement after performing open reduction and internal fixation of distal humerus fractures treated with triceps sparing approach.
Methods: This prospective study included all skeletally mature patients with distal humerus fractures and operated at our center with open reduction and internal fixation of distal humerus with triceps on or triceps sparing approach were included in the study. During the study period 30 cases underwent surgery and were included in the final analysis. Fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA classification. Patients will be followed up at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and at 6 months. Mean range of motion of the fractured elbow at different follow up points were compared.
Results: The mean age of the total population was 37.7±13.8 years, 57% males and left side was affected in 60% of the patients. Majority of the patients had a range of motion in normal elbow in the range 0 to 140 degrees. There was an increase in the mean range of movement from 63.4±14.2 at 6th week to 120±6 at 24th week, and this change was statistically significant (p<0.001).
Conclusions: Future multicentric randomized studies, specially comparing triceps-sparing with olecranon osteotomy, are needed to support the results of our study.
References
Riseborough EJ, Radin EL. Intercondylar T fractures of the humerus in the adult. A comparison of operative and non-operative treatment in twenty-nine cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:130-41.
Caja VL, Moroni A, Vendemia V, Sábato C, Zinghi G. Surgical treatment of bicondylar fractures of the distal humerus. Injury. 1994;25:433-8.
Gofton WT, Macdermid JC, Patterson SD, Faber KJ, King GJ. Functional outcome of AO Type C distal humeral fractures. J Hand Surg. 2003;28:294–308.
McKee MD, Wilson TL, Winston L, Schemitsch EH, Richards RR. Functional outcome following surgical treatment of intra-articular distal humeral fractures through a posterior ap- proach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(A):1701–7.
Bryan RS, Morrey BF. Extensive posterior exposure of the elbow. A triceps-sparing approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;166:188-92.
Morrey BF, Askew LJ, Chao EY. A biomechanical study of normal functional elbow motion. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 1981;63(6):872-7.
Illical EM, Farrell DJ, Siska PA, Evans AR, Gruen GS, Tarkin IS. Comparison of outcomes after triceps split versus sparing surgery for extra-articular distal humerus fractures. Injury. 2014;45(10):1545-8.
