Published: 2018-10-24

A comparative study of low multidirectional locked nailing and locking compression plating in management of distal tibia fractures

Balakrishna Pinnaka, Shankarlinga S., K. Ramachandra Kamath, Rajashekar Danda, M. Girish Raju


Background: Ideal management for distal tibial meta-diaphyseal fracture remains controversial, due to lack of adequate evidences about implants and multiple treatment modalities. Most commonly these fractures were dealt with either locking compression plate (LCP) or by multi directional intra-medullary nail (IMIL). Aim is to compare these two implants, to understand the mechanism and find out the ideal implant for the management of distal tibia fractures.

Methods: This study is prospective and comparative done at the associated hospitals of KMC Mangalore, spanning a period of around 2 years (October 2014 to July 2016). All patients presented with distal tibial meta-diaphyseal fractures were included in the study. Patients were treated with either low multi directional IMIL nail or by LCP and followed up for a minimum period of 6 months. Outcome measures included Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), wound issues, union of the fracture and patient mobility.

Results: 50 consecutive patients (mean age 40 years) were included in the study, divided equally into 2 groups. Group-A treated with multi directional IMIL nail and group-B with MIPPO plating. Mean functional OMAS score for nailing is 91 and for plating is 88. All fractures treated with nailing united within 6 months and 4% patient treated by plating goes mal union and 4% infected.

Conclusions: For distal tibial fracture management, intra-medullary nailing proved reliable surgical option with regards to the OMAS score, fracture union and less infection rates.


Minimal invasive plating, Olerud Molander ankle score, Intra medullary nailing

Full Text:



Fan CY, Chiang CC, Chuang TY, Chiu FY, Chen TH. Interlocking nails for displaced metaphyseal fractures of distal tibia. Int J Care Injured. 2005;36:669-74.

Ovadia DN, Beals RK. Fractures of tibial plafond. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:543-51.

Robinson CM, McLauchlan GJ, McLean IP, Court-Brown CM. Distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia with minimal involvement of the ankle. Classification and treatment by locked intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:781–7.

Williams TM, Marsh JL, Nepola JV, DeCoster TA, Hurwitz SR, Bonar SB. External fixation of tibial plafond fractures: is routine plating of the fibula necessary? J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:16–20.

Dogra AS, Ruiz AL, Thompson NS, Nolan PC. Dia-metaphyseal distal tibial fractures – treatment with a shortened intramedullary nail: a review of 15 cases. Int J Care Injured. 2000;31:799–804.

Nork SE, Schwartz AK, Agel J et al. Intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am.2005;87: 1213–21.

Egol KA, Weisz R, Hiebert R, Tejwani NC, Koval KJ, Sanders RW. Does fibular plating improve alignment after intramedullary nailing of distal meta- physeal tibia fractures? J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:94–103.

Blick SS, Brumback RJ, Lakatos R, Poka A, Burgess AR. Early bone grafting of high-energy tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;240:21–41.

Bong MR, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, Egol KA. Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity: Biomechanics and biology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(2):97-106.

Olerud C, Molander H. A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984;103:190–4.

Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. The prevention of infection in treatment of 1000 and 25 open fractures of long bones - retrospective and prospective analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(4):453–8.

Krettek C, Stephan C, Schandelmaier P, Richter M, Pape HC, Miclau T. The use of Poller screws as blocking screws in stabilising tibial fractures treated with small diameter intramedullary nails. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(6):963-8.

Horn J, Linke B, Höntzsch D, Gueorguiev B, Schwieger K. Angle stable interlocking screws improve construct stability of intramedullary nailing of distal tibia fractures: A biomechanical study. Int J Care Injured. 2009;40(7):767-71.

Ibrahimi AE, Shimi M, Daoudi A. Intramedullary nailing in the management of distal tibial fractures. Current Orthopaedic Practice. 2009;20(3):300–3.

Dhakar A, Annappa R, Gupta M, Harshwardhan H, Kotian P, Suresh PK. Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis with Locking Plates for Distal Tibia Fractures. JCDR. 2016;10(3):1-4.

Gueorguiev B, Ockert B, Schwieger K,Wahnert D, Lawson-Smith M, Windolf M, et al. Angular stability potentially permits fewer locking screws compared with conventional locking in intra-medullary nailed distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(6):340–6.

Zelle BA, Bhandari M, Espiritu M, Koval KJ, Zlowodzki M. Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group: Treatment of distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: A systematic review of 1125 fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(1):76-9.

Bonatus T, Olson SA, Lee S, Chapman MW. Non reamed locking intra-medullary nailing for open fractures of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;339:58–64.

Singer RW, Kellam JF. Open tibialdiaphyseal fractures. Results of unreamed locked intramedullary nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:114–8.

Im GI, Tae SK. Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia: A prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versus open reduction and plate and screws fixation. J Trauma Injury Infection Critical Care. 2005;59(5):1219-23.

Cheng W, Li Y, Manyi W. Comparison study of two surgical options for distal tibia fracture-minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis vs. open reduction and internal fixation. Int Orthop. 2011;35(5):737-42.

Guo JJ, Tang N, Yang HL, Tang TS. A prospective, randomised trial comparing closed intramedullary nailing with percutaneous plating in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(7):984-8.

Boenisch UW, de Boer PG, Journaeux SF. Unreamed intramedullary tibial nailing-fatigue of locking bolts. Int J Care Injured. 1996;27:265-70.