Managing lateral end clavicle fracture at a tertiary level hospital in India


  • Swaroop Solunke Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. DY Patil Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra
  • Vivek Patole Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. DY Patil Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra



Fracture clavicle, Distal end clavicle, Plating


Background: With numerous methods and recommendations for managing fracture of lateral end of the clavicle, it always creates a clinical dilemma for the treating surgeon. This study is aimed to compare the functional outcome in patients with lateral end clavicle fracture treated either with operative and non-operative modalities.

Methods: This non-randomized comparative study was conducted at Department of Orthopedics, DY Patil Medical College, Pimpri between September 2017 till June 2018, in which all patients with lateral end clavicle fracture were included. Patients were managed either non-operatively or with precontoured locking compression plate was fixed with 4 mm locking screw or 3.5 mm cortical screw. At the final follow up (at least one year) patients’ functional outcome was assessed using the Constant and Murley score.

Results: A total of 57 patients were included in the study and 93% of the patients with operative management and 66% with non-operative treatment had a union time of 8 weeks or less. Out of the 27 patients who underwent non-operative treatment, three had malunion, two had non-union and five had deformity. Based on the Constant and Murley score, 27% of the patients in the operative group had an excellent outcome, and in the non-operative group, 8% had excellent functional outcome. The functional outcome was significantly better in the operative group (p=0.034).

Conclusions: A better understanding of the risk factors for nonunion would help us to make decision between operative and nonoperative treatment. Randomized trials comparing the operative and non-operative treatments would help in understanding the merits of one method over other.


Brunner U, Habermeyer P, Schweiberer L. Die Sonderstellung der lateralen Klavicularfractur. Orthopade. 1992;21:163-71.

Moore TO. Internal pin fixation of fracture of the clavicle. Am Surg. 1951;17:580-3.

Bosworth BM. Acromio-clavicular separation: new method of repair. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1941;73:866.

Constant CR, Murley AHG. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Related Res. 1987;214:160-4.

Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, MCQueen MM, Wakefield AE. Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86A:1359–65.

Neer CS II. Fractures of the distal third of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1968;58:43–50.

Robinson CM, Cairns DA. Primary nonoperative treatment of dis- placed lateral fractures of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86:778-82.

Henkel T, Oetiker R, Hackenbruch W. Treatment of fresh Tossy III acro-mioclavicular joint dislocation by ligament suture and temporary fixation with the clavicular hooked plate [in German]. Swiss Surg. 1997;3:160-6.

Khan LA, Bradnock TJ, Scott C, Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg 2009;91:447–60.

Kalamaras M, Cutbush K, Robinson M. A method for internal fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures: early observations using a new technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:60-2.

Tiren D, Van Bemmel AJM, Swank DJ, Van der Linden FM. Hook plate fixation of acute displaced lateral clavicle fractures: mid -term results and a brief literature overview. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012;7:2.

Sambandam B, Gupta R, Kumar S, Maini L. Fracture of distal end clavicle: a review. Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma. 2014;5(2):65-73.

Soliman O, Koptan W, Zarad A. Under -corocoid-around -clavicle (UCAC) loop in type 2 distal clavicle fractures. Bone Joint J. 2013;95:983-7.

Kona J, Bosse MJ, Staeheil JW, Rosseau RL. Type II distal clavicle fractures: a retrospective review of surgical treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4:115–20.






Original Research Articles