A study on correlation between arthroscopy and MRI in internal derangement of knee


  • Anoop Nippuleti Department of Orthopedics, Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana
  • Raviteja Rudraraju Department of Orthopedics, Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana
  • Srivanth Dasari Department of Orthopedics, Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana
  • Mirza Shahrukh Baig Department of Orthopedics, Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana




Knee joint, MRI, IDK


Background: The knee joint is a common site of injury, mainly due to trauma, repetitive activities and sports activities. Multiple imaging modalities are currently used to evaluate pathologic conditions of the knee. Magnetic resonance imaging has a better soft tissue contrast and multi planar slice capability, which has revolutionized and has become the ideal modality for imaging complex anatomy of the knee joint. Another advanced modality in the management of IDK is arthroscopy, which can be used in its dual mode, either as diagnostic and/or as therapeutic tool.

Methods: Cases were taken according to inclusion and exclusion criteria i.e., patients with knee problems more than 6weeks old, with symptoms of locking of knee, patients with undiagnosed knee pain and knee injury. Only patients between 15-50 years are included in the study. Patients with signs of infection, with osteoarthritis, ankylosis, and patients on ATT were excluded from the study.

Results: In our study of 25 cases, there were 20 male and 5 female patients with age ranging from 15 years to 50 years with most patients in between 21-30 years. 11 cases admitted were sport injuries, 14 had motor vehicle accidents. Right side being more common side affected.

Conclusions: In conclusion the present study supports that clinical diagnosis is of primary necessity and MRI is additional diagnosing tool for IDK. 


Kaplan PA, Walker CW, Kilcoyne RF, Brown DE, Tusek D, Dussault RG. Occult fractures patterns of the knee associated with ACL tears. Assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. 1992;183:835-8.

Gray SD, Kalpan PA, Dussalt RG. Imaging of Knee: current status. OCNA. 1997;4:643-58.

Kean DM, Worthington BS, Preston BJ. Nuclear MRI of knee: examples of normal anatomy and pathology. Br J Radiol. 1983;56:355-61.

Boden SD, Labropoulos PA, Vailas JC. MR Scanning of the acutely injured knee: sensitive, but is cost effective? Arthroscopy J. 1990;6:306-8.

Umans H, Wimphfeimer O, Harmati N, Applbaum YH, Adler M, Bosco J. Diagnosis of partial tear of the anterior cruciate ligament of knee: value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:893-7.

Rubin DA, Kettering JM, Towers JD, Britton CA. MR imaging of knee having isolated and combined ligament injuries. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:1207-13.

Remer EM, Fitzgerald SW, Friedman H, Rogers LF, Hendrix RW. Schafer MF. ACL injury: MR diagnosis & patterns of injury. Radiographics. 1992;12:901-15.

Huegli RW, Moelleken SMC, Stork A, Bonel HM, Bredella MA, Mecket S, et al. Genanat and Philip FIT, MR imaging of post-traumatic articular cartilage injuries confined to the femoral trochleass Arthroscopic correlation and clinical significance. Euro J Radiol. 2005;53:90-5.

Ruwe PA, Wright J, Randall RL, Lynch JK, Jokl P.MR Imaging effectively replace diagnostic arthroscopy? Radiology. 1992;183:335-9.

Elvenes J, Jerome CP, Reikeras O, Johansen O. MRI as a screening procedure to avoid Arthroscopy for meniscal tears. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;2:14-6.






Original Research Articles