An evaluation of functional outcome following surgical management of fractures of the proximal humerus with Neer’s scoring system

Yeshwanth Subash; Lydia M.; Kamalakumar K.; Ilavarasan M. Dhamu

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20175064

Authors

Yeshwanth Subash Department of Orthopaedics, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Thandalam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Lydia M. Department of Orthopaedics, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Thandalam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Kamalakumar K. Department of Orthopaedics, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Thandalam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Ilavarasan M. Dhamu Department of Orthopaedics, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Thandalam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20175064

Keywords:

Proximal humerus, Fractures, Fixation, Neers scoring

Abstract

Background: Fractures of the proximal humerus are complex injuries associated with significant morbidity. Various options are available for management including non-operative treatment, depending upon the pattern of the fracture, quality of the bone and the surgeon's familiarity with the techniques. The age of the patient, physical activity and the medical fitness also largely influence the treatment options. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome following surgical management of these fractures and to compare the results with studies as available in literature.

Methods: 30 patients with fractures of the proximal humerus managed by surgical means were studied from January 2012 to January 2014 and were followed up for a minimum period of two years.

Results: All the fractures treated united clinically by 8 weeks and radiologically by 16 weeks. There were no cases of delayed or non-union in our series. The fractures were more common in men with a gender distribution of 1.3:1 and were also more common in the age group of 50 to 65 years (53%). As per the Neer’s scoring system, 60% patients had excellent results while 33% patients had satisfactory results. They were all pain free and successfully returned to their pre-injury work. 6% patients had an unsatisfactory result.

Conclusions: Surgical management of proximal humerus fractures following the principles of articular surface reconstruction, restoration of the anatomy, stable fixation, with minimal injury to the soft tissues and early mobilization, gives good functional results.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Yeshwanth Subash, Department of Orthopaedics, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Thandalam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Assistant professor

Department of Orthopaedics

References

Court Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37:691-7.

Klein M, Ostermann PAW, Juschka M, Hinkenjann B, Scherger B. Treatment of comminuted fractures of proximal humerus with Delta III reverse prosthesis. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:698–704.

Okcu G, Aktuglu K. Management of proximal humerus fractures with intramedullary flexible nails. Osteo Trauma Care. 2003;11:52-5.

Jobe FW, Tibone JE, Pink M, Jobe CM, Kvitne RS. The Shoulder in Sports. In: Rockwood and Matsen, eds. “The shoulder”. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1993: 337-379.

Tytherleigh-Strong G, Walls N, McQueen MM. The Epidemiology of Humeral shaft fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(2):249-53.

Pritsch M, Greental A. Closed pinning for humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:412-7.

Resch H, Povacz P, Fröhlich R, Wambacher M. Percutaneous pinning of 3-4 part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(2):295-300.

Krishtiansen B, Kofoed H. External fixation of displaced fractures of proximal humerus. Technique and preliminary results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69(4):643-6.

Lill H, Heep P, Rose T. The angle stable locking- proximal-humerus plate for proximal humeral fractures using a small anterior-lateral deltoid- splitting-approach. Zenthralbl Chir. 2004;129(1):43-8.

Calvo E, de Miguel I, de la Cruz JJ, Lo ́pez- Mart ́ın N. Percutaneous fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures: indications based on the correlation between clinical and radiographic results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(6):774–81.

Jaberg H, Warner JJP, Jakob RP. Percutaneous stabilization of unstable fractures of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74(4):508–15.

Alexa O, Puha B, Veliceasa B, Popia I. Percutaneous pinning for proximal humerus fractures. Revista Medico- Chirurgicala a Societatii de Medici si Naturalisti din Iasi’s. 2007;111(1):184–9.

Keener JD, Parsons BO, Flatow EL, Rogers K, Williams GR, Galatz LM. Outcomes after percutaneous reduction and fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(3):330–8.

Harrison AK, Gruson KI, Zmistowski B, Keener J, Galatz L, Williams G, et al. Intermediate outcomes following percutaneous fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 2012;94(13):1223–8.

Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J. Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(5):747-55.

Fjalestad T, Hole M, Hovden IA, Blu ̈cher J, Strømsøe K. Surgical treatment with an angular stable plate for complex displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthopaedic Trauma. 2012;26(2):98–106.

Robinson CM, Page RS. Severely impacted valgus proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86(2):143–55.

Clavert P, Adam P, Bevort A, Bonnomet F, Kempf JF. Pitfalls and complications with locking plate for proximal humerus fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(4):489–94.

Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zuckerman JD. Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthopaedic Trauma. 2008;22(3):159–64.

Yang H, Li Z, Zhou F, Wang D, Zhong B. A prospective clinical study of proximal humerus fractures treated with a locking proximal humerus plate. J Orthopaedic Trauma. 2011;25(1):11–7.

Jost B, Spross C, Grehn H, Gerber C. Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: analysis of complications, revision strategies and outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(4):542-9.

Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(4):427–33.

Bastian JD, Hertel R. Initial post-fracture humeral head ischemia does not predict development of necrosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(1):2–8.

Darder A. Darder AJ. Four part displaced proximal humerus fractures; operative treatment using Kirschner wire and a tension band. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7(6):497-505.

Esser RD. Treatment of three and four part fractures of the proximal humerus with a modified cloverleaf plate. J Orthop Trauma. 1994:788–91.

Wijgman AJ, Roolker W, Patt TW. Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four- part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1919–2.

PaavoIainen, P.Bjorkenhelm JM, Slatis P, Paukku P. Operative treatment of severe proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983;54:374-9.