DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20174704

Clinical and functional outcome of total knee replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a prospective study

Umang Shihora, Bimal Modi

Abstract


Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is now a reliable treatment for osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to study the clinical and functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty using knee society score and to find association between knee functional score and knee clinical score.

Methods: Present study was performed in 40 cases of knee patients at department of orthopedics, Gujarat Adani institute of osteoarthritis medical science, Bhuj, Kutch, Gujarat from January 2014 to February 2015. Those patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty were assessed clinically and functionally using knee society score.

Results: The mean preoperative knee clinical score (KCS) was 49.40±13.79 which was increased to a postoperative score of 86.08±5.64 at the end of 6 month. Similarly the mean preoperative knee functional score (KFS) was 32.75±11.79 which was increased to a postoperative score of 84.43±9.59 at the end of 6 month. There was significant increase in KCS and KFC score during follow up at 1, 3 and 6 month interval. There was significant association between knee functional score and knee clinical score at every interval.

Conclusions: Total knee arthroplasty improves the functional ability of the patient and the ability of the patient to get back to pre-disease state, which is to have a pain free mobile joint, as reflected by the improvement in the post-op knee clinical score and knee functional score.


Keywords


Knee clinical score, Osteoarthritis, Orthopedics, Total knee arthroplasty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Vail TP, Lang JE. Insall and Scott surgery of the knee. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier; 2006: 1455-1521.

Insall J, Ranawat CS, Scott WN, Walker P. Total condylar knee replacement. Preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;120:149-54.

Kim RH, Scott WN. Operative techniques: total knee replacement. Philadelphia: Saunders-Elsevier; 2009: 91-103.

Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:963–74.

Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:26–35.

Rissanen P, Aro S, Sintonen H, Asikainen K, Slatis P, Paavolainen P. Costs and cost-effectiveness in hip and knee replacements. A prospective study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:575–88.

Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Gunther KP, Kirschner S. Clinical benefit and cost effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the older patient. Eur J Med Res. 2009;14:76–84.

Losina E, Walensky RP, Kessler CL, Emrani PS, Reichmann WM, Wright EA, et al. Costeffectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: patient risk and hospital volume. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1113–21.

Quintana JM, Escobar A, Arostegui I, Bilbao A, Azkarate J, Goenaga JI, et al. Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of knee or hip joint replacement. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:220–6.

Bruyere O, Ethgen O, Neuprez A, Zegels B, Gillet P, Huskin JP, et al. Health-related quality of life after total knee or hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a 7-year prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:1583–7.

Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of The Knee Society Clinical Rating System. Clin Orthop. 1989;248:13-4.

Deirmengian CA, Lonner JH. What's new in adult reconstructive knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(11):2556-65.

Lee K, Goodman SB. Current state and future of joint replacements in the hip and knee. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5(3):383-93.

Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Stiehl JB. Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:748.

Wood AM, Keenan ACM, Arthur CHC, Aitken SA, Walmsley PJ, Brenkel IJ. The Functional Outcome of Total Knee Replacement in Young Patients: A 10-Year Matched Case Control Study. Open J Orthopedics. 2013;3:128-32.

Farahini H, Moghtadaei M, Bagheri A, Akbarian E. Factors Influencing Range of Motion after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2012;14(7):417-21.

Yaratapalli SR, Jambu N, Chittaranjan BS. Functional and radiological outcome of total knee

replacement in varus deformity of the knee. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2015;4(4):934-8.

Buz-Swanik C. Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86:328-34.

Barrack RL. Resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, doubleblind study. J Bone Joint Surg. 1997;79:1121-31.

Barrack RL. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83:1376 81.

Wood DJ, Smith AJ, Collopy D, White B, Brankov B, Bulsara MK. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(2):187–93.