Multidetector CT arthrography in shoulder instability and its comparison with MR arthrography and arthroscopy


  • Vinod Kumar Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi
  • Jeetendra S. Lodhi Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi
  • Dhananjay Sabat Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi
  • Rakesh Sehrawat Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi
  • Deepak Gupta Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi



Arthroscopy, Arthrography, Bankart’s lesion, Hill sachs lesion


Background: Purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic effectiveness of MDCT arthrography (MDCTA) in shoulder instability and pain in throwing and its comparison to MR arthrography (MRA) and arthroscopy taking arthroscopy as gold standard.

Methods: 20 patients with history of recurrent shoulder dislocation in activity were included in this study. After detailed clinical examination, each patient underwent MDCT-MR arthrography in one sitting followed by diagnostic arthroscopy within 6 weeks. Results were compared with the help of statistician.

Results: At arthroscopy, 10 Bankart’s lesions, 7 Hill Sachs lesion, 6 SLAP lesion, 1 ALPSA, 1 capsular laxity, 1 partial subscapularis tear and 1 supraspinatus fraying were visualized in 20 shoulders. For Bankart’s lesion MDCT has sensitivity 80%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) 83.3%. MRA has sensitivity of 90%, specificity 100%, PPV 100% and NPV 90.9%. For SLAP lesions sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for MDCTA and MRA are 88.3%, 100%, 100%, 93.3%. For Hill-Sachs lesion; sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for MDCTA are all 100% and for MRA they are 85.7%, 100%, 100%, 92.8% respectively. For ALPSA; sensitivity is 100%, specificity is 95%, PPV is 50% and NPV is 100% both for MDCTA and MRA. К value for MRA is 0.60 and for CTA is 0.55 suggesting moderate agreement.

Conclusions: Considering availability, cost, time consumption, superior detection of bony lesions and comparable detection of soft tissue lesions; MDCTA can be used as single investigation of choice in shoulder instability pain.


Acid S, Le Corroller T, Aswad R, Pauly V, Champsaur P. Pre-operative imaging of anterior shoulder instability: diagnostic effectiveness of MDCT arthrography and comparison with MR arthrography and arthroscopy. Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:661-7.

Bitzer M, Nasko M, Krackhardt T, Schick F, Schober W, Wiskirchen J, et al. Direct CT-arthrography versus Direct MR-arthrography in chronic shoulder instability: comparison of modalities after the introduction of multidetector-CT technology. Rofo. 2004;176:1770-5.

Bresler F, Blum A, Braun M, Simon JM, Cossin M, Regent D, et al. Assessment of the superior labrum of shoulder joint with CT arthrography and MR arthrography: correlation with anatomical dissection. Surg Radiol Anat. 1998;20:57-62.

Chandnani VP, Yeager TD, DeBerardino T, Christensen K, Gagliardi JA, Heitz DR, et al. Glenoid labral tears: prospective evaluation with MRI imaging, MR arthrography and CT arthrography. Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:1229-35.

McCollough CH, Zink FE. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med Phys. 1999;26:2223-30.

Neumann CH, Petersen SA, Jahnke AH Jr, Steinbach LS, Morgan FW, Helms C, et al. MRI in evaluation of patients with suspected instability of shoulder joint including a comparison with CT arthrography. Rofo. 1991;154:593-600.

Hu H, He HD, Foley WD, Fox SH. Four multidetector row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology. 2000;215:55-62.

Kligenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Kopp AF, Baum U. Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol. 1999;31:110-24.

Flohr TG, Schaller S, Stierstorfer K, Bruder H, Ohnesorge BM, Schoepf UJ. Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. Radiology. 2000;235:756-73.

Charousset C, Bellaiche L, Duranthon LD, Grimberg J. Accuracy of CT arthrography in the assessment of tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:824-8.

Nishii T, Tanaka H, Nakanishi K, Sugano N, Miki H, Yoshikawa H. Fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo MRI and MDCT arthrography of articular cartilage in patients with hip dysplasia. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:379-85.

Vande Berg BC, Lecouvet FE, Poilvache P, Maldague B, Malghem J. Spiral CT-arthrography of the knee: technique and value in assessment of internal derangement of the knee. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1800-10.

Verhagen RA, Maas M, Dijkgraaf MG, Tol JL, Krips R, Van Dijk CN. Prospective study on diagnostic strategies in osteochondral lesions of the talus. Is MRI superior to helical CT? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:41-6.

Waldt S, Bruegel M, Ganter K, Kuhn V, Link TM, Rummeny EJ, et al. Comparison of multi-slice CT arthrography and MR arthrography for the detection of articular cartilage lesions of the elbow. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:784-91.

Oh HJ, Kim JY, Choi JA, Kim WS. Effectiveness of multidetector computed tomography arthrography for the diagnosis of shoulder pathology: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging with arthroscopic correlation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(1):14-20.

Mahmoud MK, Badran YM, Zaki HG, Ali AH. One shot MR and MDCT arthrography of shoulder lesions with arthroscopic correlation. Egyptian J Radiol Nuclear Med. 2013;44:273-81.






Original Research Articles