Morphometric analysis of posterior cruciate ligament: an Indian cadaveric study

Yashavantha Kumar Chalavadi; Syed Abdul  Mubdi; Vishal Patil; Rahul Panduranga

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263937

Authors

Yashavantha Kumar Chalavadi Department of Orthopedics, Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Syed Abdul Mubdi Department of Orthopedics, Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Vishal Patil Department of Orthopedics, Raichur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka, India
Rahul Panduranga Department of Orthopedics, Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263937

Keywords:

Anterolateral bundle, Cadaver, Footprint area, Knee flexion angle, Morphometry, Posterior cruciate ligament, Posteromedial bundle, PCL reconstruction

Abstract

Background: Functionally, the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is divided into an anterolateral (AL) and a posteromedial (PM) bundle. Bundle-level morphometric data are needed to guide anatomically accurate PCL reconstruction.

Methods: The AL and PM bundles of the PCL were dissected and measured in 30 adult Indian cadaveric knees. Measurements of bundle length, midpoint width, and femoral and tibial attachment areas were recorded at knee flexion angles of 30°, 60°, and 90°.

Results: The AL bundle length increased from 34.5 mm at 30° flexion to 38.5 mm at 90° flexion, while its midpoint width decreased from 6.23 mm to 5.92 mm. In contrast, the PM bundle length decreased from 32.82 mm to 30.79 mm, whereas its midpoint width increased from 4.14 mm to 4.32 mm across the same range of flexion. Both bundles demonstrated larger femoral attachment areas compared to their corresponding tibial attachment areas. These findings indicate significant flexion-dependent changes in PCL bundle morphology.

Conclusions: Knee flexion produced significant, reciprocal changes in the dimensions of the two PCL bundles. These values provide population-specific anatomical reference data that may assist the planning of anatomical PCL reconstruction in Indian patients; their clinical relevance requires confirmation.

References

Gollehon DL, Torzilli PA, Warren RF. The role of the posterolateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of the human knee: a biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(2):233-42.

Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM. The anatomic origin of the posterior cruciate ligament: where is it? Reference landmarks for PCL reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1997;13(3):325-31.

Harner CD, Xerogeanes JW, Livesay GA, Carlin GJ, Smith BA, Kusayama T, et al. The human posterior cruciate ligament complex: an interdisciplinary study. Ligament morphology and biomechanical evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(6):736-45.

Kennedy NI, Wijdicks CA, Goldsmith MT, Michalski MP, Devitt BM, Årøen A, et al. Kinematic analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament, part 1: the individual and collective function of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(12):2828-38.

Harner CD, Livesay GA, Kashiwaguchi S, Fujie H, Choi NY, Woo SL. Comparative study of the size and shape of human anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments. J Orthop Res. 1995;13(3):429-34.

Tajima G, Nozaki M, Iriuchishima T, Ingham SJM, Shen W, Smolinski P, et al. Morphology of the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(4):859-66.

Gali JC, Oliveira HCS, Camargo AB, Martins CRB, Silva PAC, Caetano EB. Anatomical study and morphometric analyses on the femoral insertions of the posterior cruciate ligament. Rev Bras Ortop. 2013;48(2):186-90.

Johannsen AM, Anderson CJ, Wijdicks CA, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF. Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(1):35-42.

Nayyar AK, Gupta R. Morphometry of posterior cruciate ligament in knee joint: a cadaveric study. Clin Ter. 2023;174(6):525-30.

Mishra AK, Vaishnani H. Morphometric measurements of posterior cruciate ligament and its clinical implications: a cadaveric cross-sectional study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2022;16(12):AC01-4.

Dutta R, Bhattacharya A, Poddar R, Sinha I, Ghosal AK. Morphometric study of cruciate ligaments of knee joints: a cadaveric study in Eastern Indian population. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res. 2017;7(1):26-35.

Wijdicks CA, Kennedy NI, Goldsmith MT, Devitt BM, Michalski MP, Årøen A, et al. Kinematic analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament, part 2: a comparison of anatomic single- versus double-bundle reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(12):2839-48.