Functional outcomes of kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty in Indian patients: a retrospective cohort study

Sourav Shukla

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20262781

Authors

Sourav Shukla Department of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement, Medanta Super Speciality Hospital, Sushant Golf City, Amar Shaheed Path, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20262781

Keywords:

Functional outcomes, Kinematic alignment, Oxford knee score, Total knee arthroplasty

Abstract

Background: Kinematic alignment (KA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore the pre-arthritic anatomy of the knee and may offer particular benefit to Indian patients, in whom constitutional varus is common. However, functional outcome data on KA TKA in Indian populations remain limited. This study aimed to assess the functional outcomes of KA TKA in Indian patients.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 75 patients who underwent TKA at a single centre in India between January 2018 and August 2019. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Oxford knee score (OKS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. OKS values were further categorised. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare follow-up scores with baseline, with significance set at p<0.05.

Results: The cohort comprised 57 females (76%) and 18 males (24%), with a mean age of 66.75±6.95 years. The mean OKS improved from 18.6±0.87 at baseline to 50.5±1.19 at 12 months (p<0.001), with all patients reaching the ‘excellent’ category by the first follow-up. The mean VAS score fell from 5.4±0.49 to 1.0±0.00 at 12 months, an 81.4% reduction (p<0.001).

Conclusions: KA in TKA produced significant and sustained improvements in function and pain relief in Indian patients, supporting its feasibility in this population. Larger, multicentre studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

References

Fransen B, Hoozemans M, Argelo K, Keijser L, Burger B. Fast-track total knee arthroplasty improved clinical and functional outcome in the first 7 days after surgery: a randomized controlled pilot study with 5-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;138:1305–16.

Mizner R, Petterson S, Clements K, Zeni J, Irrgang J, Snyder-Mackler L. Measuring functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty requires both performance-based and patient-report assessments: a longitudinal analysis of outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(5):728–37.

Lange J, Lee Y, Spiro S, Haas S. Satisfaction rates and quality of life changes following total knee arthroplasty in age-differentiated cohorts. J Arthroplasty. 2017;33(5):1373–8.

Golladay G, Bradbury T, Gordon A, Fernandez-Madrid I, Krebs V, Patel P, et al. Are patients more satisfied with a balanced total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(7):195–200.

OrthoInfo. Total knee replacement. Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Available at: https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/ treatment/total-knee-replacement. Accessed on 21 January 2026.

Lübbeke A, Silman AJ, Barea C, Prieto-Alhambra D, Carr AJ. Mapping existing hip and knee replacement registries in Europe. Health Policy. 2018;122(5):548–57.

Maharaj Z. A team based approach is essential to optimize total knee arthroplasty outcomes. Int J Orthop Sports Med. 2020;5(1):1005.

Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth N. Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:1455–60.

Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57–6.

Samant V, Desai M. Coronal plane alignment of knee joint (CPAK) classification in Indian population study of a new classification system in Indian knees. J Orthop Rep. 2024;3(3):100277.

Rivière C, Lazic S, Villet L, Wiart Y, Allwood S, Cobb J. Kinematic alignment technique for total hip and knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3:98–105.

Shelton T, Gill M, Athwal G, Howell S, Hull M. Outcomes in patients with a calipered kinematically aligned TKA that already had a contralateral mechanically aligned TKA. J Knee Surg. 2021;34:87–93.

Abhari S, Hsing T, Malkani M, Smith A, Smith L, Mont M, et al. Patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty using restricted kinematic alignment. Bone Joint J. 2021;10(6):59–66.

Dossett HG, Estrada NA, Swartz GJ, LeFevre GW, Kwasman BG. A randomized controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(7):907–13.

Calliess T, Bauer K, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Windhagen H, Budde S, Ettinger M. PSI kinematic versus non-PSI mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:1743–48.

Nisar S, Palan J, Rivière C, Emerton M, Pandit H. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5:380–90.

Gao Z, Long N, Zhang S, Yu W, Dai Y, Xiao C. Comparison of kinematic alignment and mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Orthop Surg. 2020;12:1567–78.

Ngwayi JRM, Tan J, Liang N, Porter DE. Reliability and validity of 3 different Chinese versions of the OKS. Arthroplasty. 2020;2:1–4.

Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu KJ. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties: a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:1037–41.

Giorgino R, Nannini A, Scuttari E, Nuara A, Ciliberto R, Sosio C, et al. Analysis of short-term clinical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with kinematic alignment technique. J Clin Med. 2023;12(12):3978.

Gaur S, Iqbal K, Kumar M, Bansal R, Zuber M. Functional outcome analysis of total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritic patients in Indian population. Int J Sci Res. 2021;10:51–3.

Barot U, Chaudhari M, Bhan K. Outcomes and analysis of total knee arthroplasty with non-patella resurfacing techniques for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee in a subpopulation of Western India. Surg Update Int J Surg Orthop. 2019;5(3):175–81.

Kadam R, Sharma A, Agrawal A, Challani A, Gupta A, Pandey S, et al. Functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty in young rural patients <50 years of age. Int J Orthop Sci. 2020;6:1263–6.

Postolka B, Taylor WR, List R, Fucentese SF, Koch PP, Schütz P, et al. Tibio-femoral kinematics of natural versus replaced knees. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2022;96:105667.

Liu B, Feng C, Tu C. Kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in primary TKA: an updated meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):201.

Agrawal M, Gupta P, Badoni N, Rawat P. Evaluation of patient outcomes after TKA using American Knee Society Score and Oxford Knee Score. J Orthop Traumatol Rehabil. 2025;17:51–5.

Ragunandhan N, Jeya Venkatesh P. Outcomes of kinematically aligned TKA in Indian population. Indian J Orthop. 2021;55(5):1118–26.

Dhungana H, Jangid S, Goyal M. Alignment techniques in total knee arthroplasty: where do we stand today? Chin Med Sci J. 2024;39(3):217–25.

Winnock de Grave P, Luyckx T, Claeys K, Tampere T, Kellens J, Müller J, et al. Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30(2):488–99.

Chamundaiah JP, Gupta NR, Mahalingam S, Edwin J. Functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA in severe varus deformities in Indian population. Cureus. 2024;16(10):72398.

Hy RC, Yadav AN. Prospective study comparing VAS pre- and postoperatively following TKA. IP J Surg Allied Sci. 2025;6(3):86–9.