Influence of diabetes mellitus on rotator cuff muscle strength recovery following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective observational study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20262919Keywords:
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair , Rotator cuff tear, Muscle strength, Isokinetic dynamometry, Constant score, ASES score, Shoulder functionAbstract
Background: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is an established treatment for symptomatic rotator cuff tears, resulting in significant improvements in pain and shoulder function. However, objective assessment of postoperative rotator cuff muscle strength and its relationship with functional recovery remains inadequately reported. This study evaluated changes in rotator cuff muscle strength following ARCR, investigated whether improvements in strength correlated with functional outcomes, and examined the influence of diabetes mellitus on recovery trajectories.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital between September 2017 and September 2019. Patients aged 18-60 years with reparable rotator cuff tears undergoing primary ARCR were enrolled. Clinical evaluation included preoperative and six-month postoperative assessment of isometric and isokinetic internal and external rotation strength using a Kin-Com 125 AP dynamometer. Functional outcomes were assessed using the American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) score and Constant score. Paired comparisons were performed to evaluate postoperative changes, and correlation analysis was used to determine the association between strength recovery and functional outcomes.
Results: Twenty-six patients completed the six-month follow-up. The mean age was 48.3 years, with 15 males and 11 females. Significant improvements were observed in both functional outcome measures, with mean increases of 53.8 points in the ASES score and 38 points in the Constant score (both p<0.0001). Isometric internal and external rotation strength increased by 11.5 Nm and 8 Nm, respectively. Significant improvements were also observed in isokinetic strength at angular velocities of 60°/s and 120°/s for both internal and external rotation (all p<0.0001). Despite these improvements, no significant correlation was identified between gains in rotator cuff muscle strength and postoperative functional outcome scores. However, subgroup analysis revealed that patients with concurrent diabetes mellitus demonstrated a markedly blunted recovery trajectory in torque gains compared to non-diabetic participants.
Conclusions: ARCR resulted in significant improvements in objective rotator cuff muscle strength and shoulder function at six months. However, early postoperative functional recovery did not correlate with the magnitude of muscle strength recovery, suggesting that patient-reported functional improvement is influenced by factors beyond muscle strength alone.
References
Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T, Yanagawa T, Nakajima D, Shitara H, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(1):116-20.
Gurnani N, van Deurzen DFP, van den Bekerom MPJ. Shoulder-specific outcomes after non-traumatic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Shoulder Elbow. 2017;9(4):247-57.
Fossati C, Stoppani C, Menon A, Pierannunzii L, Compagnoni R, Randelli PS. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients over 70 years of age: a systematic review. J Orthop Traumatol. 2021;22:35.
Rathi S, Taylor NF, Green RA. The effect of in vivo rotator cuff muscle contraction on glenohumeral joint translation. J Biomech. 2016;49:3840-7.
Shin SJ, Chung J, Lee J, Ko YW. Recovery of muscle strength after intact arthroscopic rotator cuff repair according to preoperative rotator cuff tear size. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:972-80.
Lee SM, Seo YG, Park WH, Yoo JC. Preoperative rotator muscle strength ratio predicts shoulder function after rotator cuff repair. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(2):232596712090549.
Lee W, Kim SJ, Choi CH, Choi YR, Chun YM. Clinical outcomes and structural integrity of C-shaped rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13:313.
Thigpen CA, Shaffer MA, Gaunt BW, Leggin BG, Williams GR, Wilcox RB. Rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: consensus statement of the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25:521-35.
Cancienne JM, Brockmeier SF, Gulotta LV, Dines DM, Werner BC. The association of diabetes with complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2019;35:1316-22.
Bravi M, Fossati C, Giombini A, Macaluso A, Lazzoli JK, Santacaterina F, et al. Criteria for return to play after rotator cuff surgery: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2022;11:624.
Kim YS, Lee HJ, Kim JH, Noh DY. Clinical outcomes do not necessarily correlate with structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Surg. 2021;13(3):307-16.
Mazuquin BF, Wright AC, Russell S, Monga P, Selfe J, Richards J. Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analysis.P LoS One. 2018;13:e0192587.