A prospective study on functional analysis and outcome of frozen shoulder following arthroscopic capsular release in resistant cases

Shinoj Saseendran; Bharath M.; Vikash Singh Shekhawat

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20262914

Authors

Shinoj Saseendran Department of Orthopaedics, The Oxford Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Bharath M. Department of Orthopaedics, The Oxford Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Vikash Singh Shekhawat The Oxford Medical College Hospital Department of Orthopaedics, The Oxford Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India and Research Centre

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20262914

Keywords:

Adhesive capsulitis, Arthroscopy, Quality of life, Range of motion, Shoulder joint

Abstract

Background: Frozen shoulder or adhesive capsulitis, is characterized by pain and restricted shoulder motion, significantly impairing daily function. Assessment of functional outcomes after arthroscopic capsular release is essential to evaluate treatment efficacy and guide rehabilitation

Methods: This prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of arthroscopic capsular release in 32 patients aged 45–60 years with refractory frozen shoulder. Patients with rotator cuff injuries or intra-articular fractures were excluded. Preoperative and postoperative assessments at 1, 3 and 6 months included range of motion (ROM), pain via Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), functional outcomes using Constant–Murley and ASES scores and quality of life measured by EQ-5D.

Results: This study demonstrated significant improvements in shoulder ROM across all planes at 6 months (abduction: 65.2° to 140.3°, flexion: 70.4° to 145.8°, p<0.001). VAS scores decreased markedly from 7.8 to 1.0 (p<0.001). Functional scores improved substantially: Constant–Murley from 28.5 to 85.4, ASES from 32.7 to 88.2 and EQ-5D index from 0.45 to 0.91 (all p<0.001). Patients with primary etiology showed better functional recovery than secondary cases (Constant–Murley 88.2 vs. 79.4, p=0.003). Complications were minimal and transient.

Conclusions: Arthroscopic capsular release is a safe and effective intervention for frozen shoulder unresponsive to conservative treatment, resulting in significant pain relief, improved shoulder function and enhanced quality of life. Primary adhesive capsulitis patients experience superior outcomes. Further research with extended follow-up is warranted to optimize rehabilitation protocols.

References

Le HV, Lee SJ, Nazarian A, Rodriguez EK. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: review of pathophysiology and current clinical treatments. Shoulder Elbow. 2017;7;9(2):75–84.

2. Chan H, Pua P, How C. Physical therapy in the management of frozen shoulder. Singapore Med J. 2017;58(12):685–9.

Alghamdi AA, Alfaqih MH, Alfaqih EH, Alamri MA, Alfaqih LH, Mufti HH, et al. The Prevalence of Shoulder Pain and Awareness of Frozen Shoulder Among the General Population in Taif City, Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2024;14.

Ueda Y, Sugaya H, Takahashi N, Matsuki K, Kawai N, Tokai M, et al. Rotator Cuff Lesions in Patients with Stiff Shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg. 2015;97(15):1233–7.

Navarro-Ledesma S, Hamed-Hamed D, Pruimboom L. A new perspective of frozen shoulder pathology; the interplay between the brain and the immune system. Front Physiol. 2024;29:15.

Challoumas D, Biddle M, McLean M, Millar NL. Comparison of Treatments for Frozen Shoulder. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):2029581.

Jain TK, Sharma NK. The effectiveness of physiotherapeutic interventions in treatment of frozen shoulder/adhesive capsulitis: A systematic review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(3):247–73.

Sharma S, Jacobs L. Management of frozen shoulder–conservative vs surgical. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2011;93(5):343–9.

Levy O, Haddo O, Massoud S, Mullett H, Atoun E. A Patient-derived Constant-Murley Score is Comparable to a Clinician-derived Score. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(1):294–303.

Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: Reliability, validity and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(6):587–94.

Brindisino F, Minnucci S, Sergi G, Lorusso M, Struyf F, Innocenti T. Does the psychological profile of a patient with frozen shoulder predict future outcome. A systematic review. Physiotherapy Res Int. 2024;22;(1):29.

Alazabi EEY, Salama AM, Abdel Salam MA, Bakr HMAE. Functional outcome after arthroscopic capsular release in management of the shoulder adhesive capsulitis. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2021;85(1):3166–72.

Cvetanovich GL, Leroux T, Hamamoto JT, Higgins JD, Romeo AA, Verma NN. Arthroscopic 360° capsular release for adhesive capsulitis in the lateral decubitus position. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;12;5(5):87.

Mahajan S, Gadi D, Gupta R, Singla S, Setia P, Gupta S, et al. A prospective study on causes and functional outcome of frozen shoulder. Int J Med (Dubai). 2016;12;4(1):23.

Mukherjee RN, Pandey RM, Nag HL, Mittal R. Frozen shoulder - A prospective randomized clinical trial. World J Orthop. 2017;8(5):394.