Pedicle screw dimension in young patients at the national orthopaedic hospital Dala Kano Nigeria

Kawu Ahidjo Abdulkadiri; Misbahu Haruna Ahmad; Oderinde Gbadebo Afeez; Maruf Sherif Temitope; Aremu Abdurrahman Bolaji; Buba Lukman Bello

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263891

Authors

Kawu Ahidjo Abdulkadiri Department of Orthopaedics, National Orthopaedic Hospital Dala, Kano, Nigeria
Misbahu Haruna Ahmad Department of Surgery, Bayero University Kano, Nigeria
Oderinde Gbadebo Afeez Department of Orthopaedics, National Orthopaedic Hospital Dala, Kano, Nigeria
Maruf Sherif Temitope Department of Orthopaedics, National Orthopaedic Hospital Dala, Kano, Nigeria
Aremu Abdurrahman Bolaji Department of Orthopaedics, National Orthopaedic Hospital Dala, Kano, Nigeria
Buba Lukman Bello Department of Orthopaedics, National Orthopaedic Hospital Dala, Kano, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263891

Keywords:

CT morphometry, Nigeria, Pedicle screw, Paediatric spine, Spinal instrumentation

Abstract

Background: Paediatric spine surgery requires meticulous preoperative planning to select appropriate pedicle screw dimensions, as the immature spine presents unique anatomical challenges. This study aimed to determine the pedicle screw sizes and lengths used in young patients at a Nigerian tertiary hospital and evaluate the influence of preoperative CT-based planning on outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective review of 97 patients aged 6 to <18 years who underwent pedicle screw instrumentation at the National Orthopaedic Hospital Dala, Kano, from January 2019 to December 2025 was conducted. Indications included spinal infection (n=68, 70.1%), trauma (n=21, 21.6%) and scoliosis (n=8, 8.2%). Preoperative CT was used to measure pedicle transverse diameter, pedicle length and vertebral body dimensions to guide screw selection. Outcomes assessed included screw accuracy using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification, complications and need for revision.

Results: A total of 339 pedicle screws were inserted (mean 3.5 screws per patient). Screw diameters ranged from 4.0 mm to 6.5 mm, with 5.0 mm (42.5%) and 5.5 mm (31.0%) being most common. Screw lengths ranged from 25 mm to 45 mm, with 30 mm (34.8%) and 35 mm (29.5%) being most frequent. Preoperative CT measurements demonstrated that pedicle transverse diameter increased with age (r=0.52, p<0.001). Screw accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins grades A and B) was achieved in 92.6% of screws. Complications occurred in 8 patients (8.2%), including 3 (3.1%) with screw malposition requiring revision. Factors influencing screw dimension included age, level of instrumentation and underlying diagnosis.

Conclusions: Preoperative CT-based planning facilitates appropriate pedicle screw selection in paediatric patients. Screw diameters of 5.0–5.5 mm and lengths of 30–35 mm were most frequently used in this Nigerian cohort. Age and spinal level are important determinants of screw dimension.

References

Shaikh KA, Asghar J, Samdani AF, Pahys JM, Grewal H, Hwang SW, et al. Computed-tomography-based anatomical study to assess feasibility of pedicle screw placement in the lumbar and lower thoracic pediatric spine. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28(7):1025-30.

Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cho YS, Riew KD. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(3):333-42.

Gaines RW Jr. The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(10):1458-76.

Parker SL, McGirt MJ, Farber SH, Amin AG, Rick AM, Suk I, et al. Accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(1):170-8.

Fesmire FM, Luten RC. The pediatric cervical spine: developmental anatomy and clinical implications. J Emerg Med. 1989;7(2):133-42.

Osenbach RK, Menezes AH. Pediatric spinal cord and vertebral column injury. Neurosurgery. 1992;30(3):385-90.

Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, Widell EH, Knight GW, Patwardhan AG, et al. Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987;12(2):160-6.

Krag MH, Weaver DL, Beynnon BD, Haugh LD. Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13(1):27-32.

Chen J, Huang C, Zhou C, Jiang H, Feng S, Deng G, et al. Anatomy analysis of C5 CT images in children aged 1–14 years. Orthop Surg. 2025;17(10):2927-34.

Nwankwo OE, Umaru H, Onyemaechi N, Nottidge T. Pattern of spinal disorders in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23(4):499-504.

Obalum DC, Giwa SO, Adekoya-Cole TO, Enweluzo GO. Profile of spinal injuries in Lagos, Nigeria. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(2):113-6.

Polly DW Jr, Potter BK, Kuklo T, Young S, Johnson C, Klemme WR. Volumetric spinal canal intrusion: a comparison between thoracic pedicle screws and thoracic hooks. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(1):63-9.

Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, Heck B. Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(3):233-8.

Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15(1):11-4.

Belmont PJ Jr, Klemme WR, Dhawan A, Polly DW Jr. In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(21):2340-6.

Parent S, Mac-Thiong JM, Roy-Beaudry M, Sosa JF, Labelle H. Spinal cord injury in the pediatric population: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(8):1515-24.

Vogel LC, Betz RR, Mulcahey MJ. Spinal cord injuries in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2012;5(1):1-10.

Lee CS, Chung SS, Noh KH, Shin SK. Normative sagittal plane parameters of the spine in a healthy Korean population. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017;60(4):442-8.

Iyer S, Lenke LG, Nemani VM, Albert TJ, Sides BA, Metz LN, et al. Variations in sagittal alignment parameters based on age: a prospective study of asymptomatic volunteers using full-body radiographs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(23):1826-36.

Oyakhire MO, Didia BC, Yellow BE. Radiographic evaluation of the lumbar lordotic angle of the spine in a population of Nigerians. Asian J Med Sci. 2013;4(3):69-75.

Okpala FO. Measurement of lumbosacral angle in normal radiographs: a retrospective study in Southeast Nigeria. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(5):757-62.

Panjabi MM, Duranceau J, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K. Cervical human vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(8):861-9.

Meissner W, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G. Are there ethnic differences in pelvic incidence? A systematic review. Spine J. 2022;22(5):812-20.

Ishaku CM, Jawa BK, Maduagwu SM, Hassan AB, Lawan A, Rufa'i AA, et al. Pattern and outcome of traumatic spinal cord injury managed at University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Nigeria: A retrospective study. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2021;28(2):139-44.

Ranjbar Hameghavandi MH, Khodadoust E, Hassan Zadeh Tabatabaei MS, Farahbakhsh F, Ghodsi Z, Rostamkhani S, et al. Challenges in traumatic spinal cord injury care in developing countries - a scoping review. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1377513

Adams MA, Roughley PJ. What is intervertebral disc degeneration and what causes it? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(18):2151-61.

Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(3):403-8.