Radiological parameters in the evaluation of functional outcomes following locking plate fixation of comminuted proximal humerus fractures

Ashok K. Gachhayat; Sumanyu K. Tripathy; Anwesit Mohanty; Debashish Mishra; Saurav N.  Nanda; Swatantra A. Mohanty

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263915

Authors

Ashok K. Gachhayat Department of Orthopaedics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Scinces, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Sumanyu K. Tripathy Department of Orthopaedics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Scinces, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Anwesit Mohanty Department of Orthopaedics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Scinces, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Debashish Mishra Department of Orthopaedics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Scinces, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Saurav N. Nanda Department of Orthopaedics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Scinces, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Swatantra A. Mohanty Department of Orthopaedics, Manipal Tata Medical College, Jameshdpur, Jharkhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263915

Keywords:

Proximal humerus fracture, Neck-shaft angle, Locking plate fixation, Humeral head height, Constant shoulder score, Varus malunion

Abstract

Background: The incidence of PHF is about 5% of all fractures that are clinically treated and is more common in elderly females. Locking plates are commonly used for fracture stabilization and provide stable fracture management. But some problems like reduction loss and varus malunion can have a great effect on functional outcomes. This study aimed to assess the role of radiological parameters-neck-shaft angle (NSA) and humeral head height (HHH)-in predicting functional outcomes in comminuted PHF treated with locking plates.

Methods: A retrospective study was done on 50 patients who were treated at Pradyumna Bal Memorial Hospital, KIMS from July 2018 to July 2019 with a minimum followup of one year. The Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) was used to assess functional outcomes. Radiographic parameters were assessed at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Data was analysed using Jamovi software version 2.3.28.

Results: The mean age of the study participants was 54 +/-(19) years, which included 29 (58%) males and 21 (42%) females. The fracture union was obtained in 44 (88%) patients and 6 (12%) patients needed revision surgery. The postoperative NSA was 130° (range 120° to 140°) and was found to be related to the higher CSS scores. Patients with optimal NSA and HHH (44 patients, 88%) had significantly better functional outcome (CSS ~85), while patients with nonunion or suboptimal alignment had lower scores (CSS ~60, p<0.05).

Conclusions: Radiological alignment plays an important role in functional outcome following PHF treated with locked plates. A large NSA (>125°) and adequate humeral head height prevent varus malunion and improve shoulder function after surgery. Optimum recovery will be achieved with careful surgical planning and restoration of anatomical alignment.

References

Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691-7.

Longo UG, Gulotta LV, De Salvatore S, Lalli A, Bandini B, Giannarelli D, Denaro V. Augmented versus non-augmented locking-plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2024;106-B(7):646-55.

D'Almeida SS, Cannon R, Vu NT, Ponce BA, Redden D. Comparing intramedullary nails and locking plates in displaced proximal humerus fracture management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2024;16(2):e54235.

Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(4):427-33.

Constant CR, Murley AG. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. 1987;214:160-4.

Charalambous CP, Eastwood S. Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures. Part I: Classification and Evaluation. In: Classic Papers in Orthopaedics. London: Springer London; 2013:323-325.

Boesmueller S, Wech M, Gregori M, Domaszewski F, Bukaty A, Fialka C, et al. Risk factors for humeral head necrosis and non-union after plating in proximal humeral fractures. Injury. 2016;47(2):350-5.

Kishore JVS, Tonape P. Clinical and functional outcome of proximal humerus fractures treated with locking compression plate (LCP) in adults - A prospective study. Indian J Orthop Surg 2020;6(4):328-35.

Peng CC, Tai TH, Chen CY. Locking plate fixation with calcium phosphate bone cement augmentation for elderly proximal humerus fractures-a single-center experience and literature review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(17):5109.

Ou Z, Feng Q, Peng L, Zhou M, Rai S, Tang X. Risk factors for osteonecrosis of the humeral head after internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024;144(1):31-40.

Hertel R. Fractures of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(Suppl 2):S65-72.

Polykandriotis E, Zschiegner A, Horch RE, Schürmann M. Bone allograft and locking plate for severe proximal humeral fractures: early and late outcomes. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e928982.

Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(8):488-93.

Bai L, Fu ZG, Wang TB, Chen JH, Zhang PX, Zhang DY, Jiang BG. Radiological evaluation of reduction loss in unstable proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plates. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(3):271-4.

Goyal S, Ambade R, Singh R, Lohiya A, Patel H, Patel SK, et al. A comprehensive review of proximal humerus fractures: from epidemiology to treatment strategies. Cureus. 2024;16(4).

Launonen AP, Lepola V, Saranko A, Flinkkilä T, Laitinen M, Mattila VM. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures. Arch Osteoporos. 2015;10:209.

Pandya D, Soni K. Analysis of functional outcome in proximal humerus plating (PHILOS) in displaced proximal humerus fracture. Acta Scientific Orthopaedics. 2020;3(11):37-49.

Birsel O, Eren İ, Chodza M, Koyuncu Ö, Demirhan M. Proximal humerus fractures treated with Proximal Humerus Inter Locking system: minimum 10-year clinical and radiological outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2026;35(2):e273-e281.

Ranson R, Roller R, Dedhia N, Littlefield CP, Konda S, Zuckerman JD, et al. No change in outcome ten years following locking plate repair of displaced proximal humerus fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022;32(6):1195-1200.

Kantharaju H, Gawhale SK, Prasanna Kumar GS, Sahare B, Shah N. Factors influencing the varus deformity of humeral head in proximal humerus fractures and its relation to functional outcome. Indian J Orthop. 2021;55(3):702-7.

Dai F, Xiang M, Zhang Q, Yang J, Li Y. Effect of the initial deformity in the coronal plane on postoperative outcome of proximal humeral fractures. Orthop Surg. 2023;15(8):2074-81.

Clavert P, Adam P, Bevort A, Bonnomet F, Kempf JF. Pitfalls and complications with locking plate for proximal humerus fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(4):489-94.

Kavuri V, Bowden B, Kumar N, Cerynik D. Complications associated with locking plate of proximal humerus fractures. Indian J Orthop. 2018;52(2):108-16.

Jung WB, Moon ES, Kim SK, Kovacevic D, Kim MS. Does medial support decrease major complications of unstable proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plate? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:102.

Park C, Jang S, Lee A, Kim HY, Lee YB, Kim TY, Ha YC. Incidence and mortality after proximal humerus fractures over 50 years of age in South Korea: national claim data from 2008 to 2012. J Bone Metab. 2015;22(1):17-21.