Cost-conscious comparison of dynamic condylar screw versus locking compression plate fixation in distal femur fractures: a comprehensive functional and physiotherapy-oriented evaluation

Syed Suhaib Jameel; Ronak Kotian; J. S. R. G. Saran; Win Gel Lim; Naveena Kirubaharan; Hemanth Kalyan

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263905

Authors

Syed Suhaib Jameel Department of Orthopaedics, NHS Golden Jubilee, Glasgow, Scotland
Ronak Kotian Department of Orthopaedics, NHS Golden Jubilee, Glasgow, Scotland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9268-9674
J. S. R. G. Saran Department of Orthopaedics, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysore, Karnataka, India
Win Gel Lim Department of General Medicine, NHS Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
Naveena Kirubaharan Department of Emergency Medicine, NHS Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland
Hemanth Kalyan Department of Orthopaedics, Manipal Hospital Old Airport Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263905

Keywords:

Continuous passive motion, Functional outcome, Radiological union, Distal femur fracture, Dynamic condylar screw, Locking compression plate

Abstract

Background: Distal femur fractures are complex injuries associated with substantial morbidity, particularly in comminuted and intra-articular patterns. Locking Compression Plates (LCP) provide angular stability and facilitate early mobilization, whereas Dynamic Condylar Screws (DCS) remain a cost-effective option in resource-limited settings. This study compared radiological, functional, rehabilitation and economic outcomes between LCP and DCS fixation under a standardized physiotherapy protocol.

Methods: A retrospective-prospective observational cohort study was conducted from January 2018 to December 2021 involving 33 adults with AO/OTA 33-A or 33-C distal femur fractures. Eighteen patients underwent distal femur LCP fixation and 15 underwent DCS fixation. All patients followed a structured continuous passive motion (CPM)-assisted rehabilitation program. Outcomes assessed included radiological union, knee range of motion, functional scores, complications, and treatment cost.

Results: The LCP group demonstrated earlier radiological union (approximately 16 to 17 weeks vs. 19 weeks in the DCS group) and superior knee flexion throughout rehabilitation. Final knee flexion ranged from 105⁰ to 122⁰ in the LCP cohort compared with 95⁰ to 112⁰ in the DCS cohort. Functional outcomes, including Knee Society Score, Lysholm score, Neer’s grading, and Timed Up and Go performance, favoured LCP fixation. Varus malalignment and non-union were more frequent in the DCS group. However, LCP fixation incurred 35% to 45% higher direct treatment costs.

Conclusions: LCP fixation provides earlier union, improved range of motion, and superior functional recovery compared with DCS fixation, particularly in comminuted and osteoporotic fractures. Despite higher costs, LCP with structured CPM-assisted rehabilitation may offer better outcomes in selected high-demand patients, while DCS remains a cost-effective option for simpler fracture patterns.

References

Gupta G, Sah RK, Thakur P, Ruhullaha M, Thapa S. Functional outcome of locking compression plate in distal femur fractures. Med Phoenix. 2023;8(2):7-13.

Prakash A, Kumar S, Nath R, Ali S. Functional and radiological outcomes after locking plate fixation of AO type 33C distal femur fractures. J Orthop Case Rep. 2025;15(2):275-82.

Vikranth PS, Chaitanya V, Varenya V. Management of distal femoral fractures treated with locking compression plate: a prospective study. Int J Res Orthop. 2019;5(3):478.

Narsaria N, Singh AK, Rastogi A, Singh V. Biomechanical analysis of distal femoral fracture fixation: dynamic condylar screw versus locked compression plate. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19(5):770-5.

Mustofa MG, Rob CF, Alam MK, Bhuiyan A, Chowdhury HR, Khan SA, et al. Outcome of dynamic condylar screw with plate versus distal femoral lock compression plate fixation in fracture of distal femur. Med Today. 2021;33(1):45-9.

Kumar BA, Shravan Kumar PA, Omer FB, Cherukuri N, Reddy LM. Comparative analysis of the functional outcome of distal femur fractures treated with distal femur locking plate versus dynamic condylar screw. Int J Heal Clin Res. 2021;4(5):243-7.

Khan NA, Atif AM, Chatterjee A. Management of intercondylar femur fracture with distal femur locking compression plate: outcome analysis of 72 cases. Int J Res Orthop. 2020;6(5):1022.

O’Connor-Read LM, Davidson JA, Davies BM, Matthews MG, Smirthwaite P. Comparative endurance testing of the Biomet Matthews Nail and the dynamic compression screw, in simulated condylar and supracondylar femoral fractures. Biomed Eng Online. 2008;7(1):3.

Saini DRA, Shah DN, Sharma DD. Functional outcome of distal femoral fractures treated with DF-LCP [Distal femur locking compression plate]. Int J Orthop Sci. 2018;4(1g):439-44.

Khan AH, Samo A, Safdar M, Zaib B, Mustafa MA, Amin A. Comparison of radiological outcome between dynamic condylar screw (DCS) and distal femoral locking compression plate (LCP) technique in distal femoral fracture. Prof Med J. 2025;32(03):266-71.

Singh S, Arif M, Gupta A. Functional and radiological outcome of surgical fixation of distal femur fractures by distal femoral locking plate in a tertiary care hospital in North India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2021;9(11):3411.

Reddy GR, Prasad PN. Comparison of study of a dynamic condylar screw surgery and distal femoral locking compression plate technique in distal femoral fractures. Int J Res Orthop. 2017;3(3):440.

Shawky M, Abdel Karim M, Samir Mohamed Farahat A, Goda El-Hamalawy A. Management of distal femoral fractures: A review article. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2023;46(102291):102291.

Gururaj NG, Vinaya G, Ahmad R. Comparative study between Dynamic Condylar Screw and Locking Plate Fixation in fractures of distal femur in adults-A study of 30 cases. Ind J Orthop Surg. 2016;2(2):147.

Lemsanni M, Najeb Y. Outcomes of distal femoral fractures treated with dynamic condylar screw (DCS) plate system: a single centre experience spanning 15 years. Pan Afr Med J. 2021;38(363):363.

Thorat BS, Mavani R, Kamboj AS, Das A, Krishna ARV, Mittal P. Stability, biology, and function: Outcomes of lateral locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures. Ann Medi Med Sci. 2026;149-52.

Nandan A, Shekhar R, Kumar R. Assessment of functional outcomes following locking compression plate fixation for distal femur fractures: a prospective study at a tertiary care hospital. Int J Curr Pharm Rev Res. 2024;16(12):559-63.

Bachu S, L R. A study of surgical management of distal femoral fractures in adults using locking compression plate. Int J Res Orthop. 2017;3(2):253.

Karekar HJ, Akhuj A, Ramteke SU. Physical rehabilitation post-surgery in a distal femur fracture post removal of implant. Cureus. 2023;15(12):e51358.

Kale S, Dhar S, Bhor P, Phadnis A, Vatkar A, Jayaram R. Emerging trends in distal femur fracture treatment modalities - A narrative review. J Orthop Case Rep. 2025;15(3):215-9.

Agrawal A, Heddur Shanthappa A, Panduranga A. Functional and radiological outcome of distal femur fracture with intra-articular extension fixed with variable angle-locking compression plate: a prospective study. Int J Res Orthop. 2025;11(5):1098-102.

Kumar R, Prasad M. Evaluation of functional and radiological outcome of distal femoral fracture fixation treated with locking plate. Int J Pharm Clin Res. 2023;15(9):191-6.

Jain DT, Sahu DRL, Bhatia DR, Pratap DH. A comparative analysis of functional outcome of distal femur fractures treated with Locking Compression Plate fixation and Non-Locking Plate fixation. Int J Medi All Body Heal Res. 2025;6(3):200-7.

Babhulkar S, Trikha V, Babhulkar S, Gavaskar AS. Current concepts in management of distal femur fractures. Injury. 2024;55 Suppl 2(111357):111357.