Functional outcomes of medial parapatellar versus patellar tendon splitting approaches in intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a prospective comparative study

Sreerag M. R.; Anantha Balaram B.; Abdusamad V.; Anjana Pillai

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263912

Authors

Sreerag M. R. Department of Orthopaedics, MES Medical College, Perinthalmanna, Malappuram, Kerala, India
Anantha Balaram B. Department of Orthopaedics, MES Medical College, Perinthalmanna, Malappuram, Kerala, India
Abdusamad V. Department of Orthopaedics, MES Medical College, Perinthalmanna, Malappuram, Kerala, India
Anjana Pillai Department of Orthopaedics, MES Medical College, Perinthalmanna, Malappuram, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263912

Keywords:

Tibial shaft fractures, Medial parapatellar approach, Lysholm knee score, Gustilo Anderson classification, Anterior knee pain, Patellar tendon splitting approach, Visual analogue scale

Abstract

Background: Anterior knee pain remains the most common complication following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. The surgical approach used for nail insertion is an important factor influencing postoperative knee morbidity.

Methods: This prospective observational study included 42 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary interlocking nailing between April 2024 and March 2026. Patients were managed using either patellar tendon splitting or medial parapatellar approach. Functional outcomes were assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and Lysholm Knee Score (LKS) at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

Results: Both groups were comparable in baseline characteristics. Fracture union was achieved in all patients by 6 months. While overall pain prevalence was similar at 1 year (p=0.533), VAS scores were significantly lower in the medial parapatellar group from 3 months onward (p<0.001). The medial parapatellar group demonstrated significantly better knee flexion, reduced extension lag, and higher Lysholm scores at all follow-up intervals (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Both approaches are effective for achieving fracture union; however, the medial parapatellar approach results in superior functional outcomes and lower pain severity. It may be preferred when feasible.

References

Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691-7.

Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2015.

Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Tornetta P 3rd, et al. Intramedullary nailing versus plating for tibial shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15(6):401-407.

Keating JF, O'Brien PJ, Blachut PA, Meek RN, Broekhuyse HM. Locking intramedullary nailing with and without reaming for open fractures of the tibial shaft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(3):334-41.

Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Tornetta P. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Trauma. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2015.

Toivanen JA, Väistö O, Kannus P, Latvala K, Honkonen SE, Järvinen MJ. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(4):580-5.

Leliveld MS, Verhofstad MH. Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve. Injury. 2012;43(6):779-83.

Bhattacharyya T, Seng K, Nassif NA, Freedman I. Knee pain after tibial nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(5):314-7.

Keating JF, Orfaly R, O'Brien PJ. Knee pain after tibial nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(1):10-3.

Tornetta P, Collins E. Semiextended position for intramedullary nailing of the proximal tibia. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(2):94-7.

Court-Brown CM, Gustilo T, Shaw AD. Knee pain after intramedullary tibial nailing: its incidence, etiology, and outcome. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(2):103-5.

Keating JF, Orfaly R, O'Brien PJ. Knee pain after tibial nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(1):10-3.

Tornetta P III, Collins E. Semiextended position of intramedullary nailing of the proximal tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;(328):185-9.

Toivanen JA, Väistö O, Kannus P, Latvala K, Honkonen SE, Järvinen MJ. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft: an ultrasound study of the patellar tendon after medial parapatellar and transpatellar approaches. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16(9):648-53.

Vaisto O, Toivanen J, Kannus P, Järvinen M. Anterior knee pain and thigh muscle strength after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a report of 40 consecutive cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(1):18-23.

Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Tornetta P III, Schemitsch EH, Swiontkowski MF, Sanders D, et al. Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(12):2567-78.

Toivanen JA, Väistö O, Kannus P, Latvala K, Honkonen SE, Järvinen MJ. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft: an ultrasound study of the patellar tendon after medial parapatellar and transpatellar approaches. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16(9):648-53.

Bhattacharyya T, Seng K, Nassif NA, Freedman I. Knee pain after tibial nailing: the role of nail prominence. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;449:303-7.

Vaisto O, Toivanen J, Paakkala T, Järvelä T, Kannus P, Järvinen M. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: an MRI study of the patellar tendon. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(5):311-6.

Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10(3):150-4.

Court-Brown CM, Christie J, McQueen MM. Closed intramedullary tibial nailing: its use in closed and type I open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(4):605-11.