Comparative study of the burden associated with the management of open tibia shaft fractures using Ilizarov frame fixator and linear rail system in a resource poor country

Mbanefo Francis Onyemelukwe; Michael Oluyinka Okunola; Ajibola Babatunde Oladiran; Richard A. Omoyeni; Olugboyega A. Oyewole; Mosimabale J.  Balogun; Tolulope O. Ogunrewo; Oluwasegun A. Aremu

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263897

Authors

Mbanefo Francis Onyemelukwe Federal Medical Centre, Asaba, Nigeria
Michael Oluyinka Okunola Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
Ajibola Babatunde Oladiran Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
Richard A. Omoyeni Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
Olugboyega A. Oyewole Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
Mosimabale J. Balogun Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
Tolulope O. Ogunrewo Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
Oluwasegun A. Aremu Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263897

Keywords:

Burden, Ilizarov frame fixator, Linear rail system, Open tibia shaft fractures

Abstract

Background: Management of open tibia shaft fractures is frequently laden with complications. Hence this places an enormous burden on the patient and the surgeon alike. The use of Ilizarov frame fixator and Linear rail system [LRS] as the definitive fixation device minimized the number of surgeries, length of hospital-stay and financial burden on the patient whilst achieving fracture union and reduced concomitant complications associated with open fracture care. The study objective is to determine and compare the union rate, non-union rate, associated complications encountered as well as the mean total cost implication in the management of open tibia shaft fractures using the Ilizarov frame fixator and Linear rail system [LRS] in Ibadan, Nigeria.

Methods: This is a follow up study to our previous prospective study involving thirty (30) patients of both sexes, divided into two (2) groups; Ilizarov frame fixator group and LRS group. All patients had open tibia shaft fractures of Gustillo-Anderson Class [GA II-IIIB]. The union rate, non-union rate, associated complications noted while on the respective devices as well as the mean total cost implication of managing these open tibia fractures using the Ilizarov frame fixator and LRS respectively were all assessed.

Results: The union rate in the LRS group was 86.7% while the non-union rate was 13.3%. In the Ilizarov group, the union rate was 93.3% while the non-union rate was 6.7%. In this study, pin tract infection was the most common complication associated with using both devices. The mean cost price for purchasing the LRS was shown to be N175,933.3±12,775.0 while that of the Ilizarov frame fixator was N216,000.00±42,895.0. The mean total cost implication for the management of open tibia shaft fractures using LRS and Ilizarov frame fixators were N455,960.0±46,967.3 and N505,614.3±113,345.9 respectively. There is no significant difference noted in the union rate, non-union rate, associated complications encountered as well as in the mean total cost implication in the management of these open tibia shaft fractures using the fixators under review.

Conclusions: This study has shown that management of open tibial shaft fractures using either Ilizarov frame fixator or Linear rail system [LRS] is very cost effective especially in a resource poor country like Nigeria.

References

Nicoll EA. Closed and Open Management of Tibial Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974;105:144-53.

Wanjema S, Oluoch R, Ayumba BR, et al. Tibial Diaphyseal Fractures: Aetiology, morphology and treatment in adult patients at Moi Teaching And Referral Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya. East Afr Orthop J. 2020;14(1):8-13.

Ibeanusi SEB, Ekere AU. Epidemiology of open tibial fractures in a teaching hospital. P H Med J. 2007;1(3):156-60.

Madubueze CC, Chukwu CO, Omoke NI, Oyakhilome OP, Ozo C. Road traffic injuries as seen in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Int Orthop. 2011;35(5):743-6.

Elachi IC, Okunola BB, Yongu WT, Onyemaechi NO, Odatuwa-Omagbemi OD, Ahachi CN, et al. Motorcycle-related injuries at a university teaching hospital in north central Nigeria. Niger Med J Niger Med Assoc. 2014;55(6):452-5.

Pal CP, Kumar H, Kumar D, Dinkar KS, Mittal V, Singh NK. Comparative study of the results of compound tibial shaft fractures treated by Ilizarov ring fixators and limb reconstruction system fixators. Chin J Traumatol. 2015;18(06):347-51.

Onyemelukwe MF, Okunola MO, Owoola AM, Oladiran AB, Adeoye-Sunday II, Anejukwo AA, et al. Comparative outcome study of the management of open tibia shaft fractures using Ilizarov frame fixator and linear rail system at University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Int Orthopaed. 2025;49(8):1973-80.

8. Jangle R. Treatment of Compound Tibial Diaphyseal Fractures by Ilizarov Method: A Retrospective Study. Int J Sci Res IJSR 2020; 9: 883–886.

Kale AB, Patole VV, Argekar HG, Sharan S, Goregaonkar AB. Limb reconstruction system as a primary and definitive mode of fixation in open fractures of long bones. Int J Res Orthop. 2017;3(2):167-71.

10. Singh P, Singh SK, Gill SPS. Management of Compound fractures of tibia by Limb Reconstruction System (LRS). J Bone Jt Dis. 2020;35(1):29-34.

Ajmera A, Verma A, Agrawal M, Jain S, Mukherjee A. Outcome of limb reconstruction system in open tibial diaphyseal fractures. Ind J Orthopaed. 2015;49(4):429-35.

Soni JK, Kulkarni S, Khodnapur G, Bagewadi R, Nandi SS, Kulkarni SR. Management of open tibial diaphyseal fractures by limb reconstruction system as primary and definitive treatment: A prospective cohort study. Cureus. 2023;15(5).

Vyas DT, Shah DH, Shah DA. Retrospective study of open tibial diaphyseal fractures type IIIA and IIIB by Ilizarov method. Int J Orthop Sci. 2017;3:507-12.

Inan M, Halici M, Ayan I, Tuncel M, Karaoglu S. Treatment of type IIIA open fractures of tibial shaft with Ilizarov external fixator versus unreamed tibial nailing. Arch Orthopaed Trauma Surg. 2007;127(8):617-23.

Sidharthan S, Sujith A, Rathod AK, Pathak RH. Management of high energy tibial fractures using the Ilizarov apparatus. Internet J Orthop Surg. 2005;2(2):1-6.

Wani N, Baba A, Kangoo K, Mir M. Role of early Ilizarov ring fixator in the definitive management of type II, IIIA and IIIB open tibial shaft fractures. Int Orthopaed. 2011;35(6):915-23.

Tarek A. Role of Ilizarov ring fixator in management of high diaphyseal fractures. EC Orthopaed. 2020;11:13-26.

Kayode MO, Adewole OA, Shoga MO, Giwa SO. Experience with managing complicated fractures using ilizarov principle in Lagos, Nigeria. J West Afr Coll Surge. 2017;7(3):24-43.

Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250(1):81-104.

Dabkana TM, Nyaku FT, Bukar B. Management of traumatic segmental bone loss using linear rail system, our experience at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri, Nigeria. Sahel Med J. 2016;19(4):171-4.