Surgical management of proximal humeral fractures in a resource-limited setting: a retrospective cohort study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20261732Keywords:
Fracture, Proximal humerus, Surgical treatment, Function, Resource-limited settingAbstract
Background: The management of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) remains controversial, particularly in resource-limited settings where access to modern implants is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of PHF in adults in Yaoundé and to identify factors influencing prognosis.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent surgery for hip fractures between 2015 and 2020 at three specialist hospitals in Yaounde (the Yaoundé Central Hospital (YCH), the Yaoundé Emergency Centre (YEC) and the Yaoundé Military Hospital (YMH)). Data were collected on demographic characteristics, fracture characteristics, surgical techniques and outcomes. Functional outcomes were assessed using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) and Constant-Murley scores, and radiological outcomes were assessed at follow-up.
Results: A total of 47 patients were identified, of whom 28 were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 44±16 years, with a predominance of males (61%). Most fractures were two-part fractures according to the Neer classification (80.5%) and type A fractures according to the AO/OTA classification (78.1%). Plate fixation was used in 61% of cases, exclusively with non-locking implants. Anatomical reduction was achieved in 28.6% of patients. Bone union was observed in 85.7% of cases. Complications included malunion (35.7%), avascular necrosis (7.3%) and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (10.7%). The mean Constant and DASH scores were 63.3 and 33.2, respectively.
Conclusions: Despite limited technical resources and the use of non-locking implants, surgical treatment of hip fractures in this setting yields acceptable functional outcomes. However, complication rates remain high, highlighting the need to improve surgical facilities and the availability of implants.
Metrics
References
Launonen AP, Lepola V, Saranko A, Flinkkilä T, Laitinen M, Mattila VM. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures. Arch Osteoporos. 2015;10:2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-015-0209-4
Iglesias-Rodríguez S, Domínguez-Prado DM, García-Reza A, Fernández-Fernández D, Pérez-Alfonso E, García-Piñeiro J, et al. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Surg. 2021;16(1):402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02551-x
Pandey R, Raval P, Manibanakar N, Nanjayan S, McDonald C, Singh H. Proximal humerus fractures: A review of current practice. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2023;43:102233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102233
Liu J, Zhang Z, Li P, Piao C. Enhancing fixation stability in proximal humerus fractures: screw orientation optimization in PHILOS plates through finite element analysis and biomechanical testing. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):27064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78702-x
Li D-Y, Zhang K. Cement-augmented locked plate fixation proximal humerus fractures in elderly patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07502-1
Cheng H-Y, Liang C-W, Wang J-H, Kuo Y-R, Ko P-Y, Chuang C-H, et al. The effects of augmentation choices for locking plate fixation in proximal humerus fracture osteosynthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Traumatol. 2025;26(1):47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-025-00852-z
Vaccalluzzo MS, Sapienza M, Valenti S, Di Tomasi B, Lucenti L, Pavone V, et al. Intramedullary Nails vs. Locking Plates for Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures in Patients over 60: A Comparative Clinical Study. J Clin Med. 2025;14(13):4563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134563
Blair KJ, Paladino L, Shaw PL, Shapiro MB, Nwomeh BC, Swaroop M. Surgical and trauma care in low- and middle-income countries: a review of capacity assessments. J Surg Res. 2017;210:139-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.11.005
Shanthakumar D, Payne A, Leitch T, Alfa-Wali M. Trauma Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Surg J. 2021;7(4):e281-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1732351
Mock C, Cherian MN. The global burden of musculoskeletal injuries: challenges and solutions. Clin Orthop 2008;466(10):2306-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0416-z
Ewbank C, Derbew M, Ratnayake A, Gupta S, Hughes MC, Wren SM, et al. Global Surgery: The Road Less Traveled and How to Get Back on Track. World J Surg 2023;47:1090-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-06920-x
Gosselin RA, Spiegel DA, Coughlin R, Zirkle LG. Injuries: the neglected burden in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(4):246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.08.052290
Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130
Handoll HH, Cameron ID, Mak JC, Panagoda CE, Finnegan TP. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;11:CD007125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007125.pub3
Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(6):1090-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197052060-00002
Bouvard B, Annweiler C, Legrand E. L’Ostéoporose des personnes âgées. Rev Rhum. 2021;88:273-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhum.2021.03.014
Seng VS, Masquelet AC. Management of civilian ballistic fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:953-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.08.005
Brorson S, Olsen BS, Frich LH, Jensen SL, Sørensen AK, Krogsgaard M, et al. Surgeons agree more on treatment recommendations than on classification of proximal humeral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-114
Nowak LL, Vicente MR, McKee MD, Hall JA, Nauth A, Schemitsch EmilH. Orthopaedic surgeons’ opinions surrounding the management of proximal humerus fractures: an international survey. Int Orthop. 2017;41(9):1749-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3569-0
Baker HP, Gutbrod J, Cahill M, Shi L. Optimal Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: Risks and Management Challenges. Orthop Res Rev. 2023;15:129-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S340536
Südkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P, Voigt C, Oestern H, Kääb M, et al. Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures with Use of the Locking Proximal Humerus Plate: Results of a Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. JBJS. 2009;91(6):1320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00006
Tran DQ, Nguyen SA, Dang AH. Clinical outcomes of locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures in patients aged 60 and older: A retrospective cohort study in Vietnam. J Orthop Rep. 2026;5:100742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorep.2025.100742
Gardner MJ, Weil Y, Barker JU, Kelly BT, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. The Importance of Medial Support in Locked Plating of Proximal Humerus Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(3):185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3180333094
Kralinger F, Blauth M, Goldhahn J, Käch K, Voigt C, Platz A, et al. The Influence of Local Bone Density on the Outcome of One Hundred and Fifty Proximal Humeral Fractures Treated with a Locking Plate. JBJS. 2014;96(12):1026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00028
Tejwani NC, Liporace F, Walsh M, France MA, Zuckerman JD, Egol KA. Functional outcome following one-part proximal humeral fractures: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(2):216-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.016
Richard GJ, Denard PJ, Kaar SG, Bohsali KI, Horneff JG, Carpenter S, et al. Outcome measures reported for the management of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(10):2175-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.006
Robinson CM, Stirling PH, Goudie EB, MacDonald DJ, Strelzow JA. Complications and long-term outcomes of open reduction and plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. JBJS. 2019;101(23):2129-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00595
Peters P-M, Plachel F, Danzinger V, Novi M, Märdian S, Scheibel M, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes after surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with head-split component. JBJS. 2020;102(1):68-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00320
Siebenbürger G, Van Delden D, Helfen T, Haasters F, Böcker W, Ockert B. Timing of surgery for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures. Injury. 2015;46(4):S58-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30019-X
Liu Q, Qin Y, Zhang H, Guo W, Ma T, Zhang M. Analysis of risk factors and prevention strategies of shoulder joint stiffness after traumatic proximal humeral fracture in patients with osteoporosis. Front Med. 2026;12:1641583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1641583
Rojas JT, Rashid MS, Zumstein MA. How to treat stiffness after proximal humeral fractures? EFORT Open Rev. 2023;8(8):651-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-22-0118