Unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar spinal stenosis: outcomes and potential to reduce fusion in Schizas grade D patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20262904Keywords:
Lumbar spinal stenosis, Minimally invasive spine surgery, Schizas grade D, Unilateral biportal endoscopy, Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompressionAbstract
Background: Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is an established minimally invasive technique for the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). However, prospective evidence regarding its effectiveness in severe stenosis, particularly Schizas Grade D disease, remains limited. This study evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of UBE with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in patients with LSS, with particular emphasis on severe stenosis.
Methods: This prospective single-surgeon study included 134 consecutive patients with LSS who underwent UBE decompression between April 2021 and September 2023. Patients with pre-existing instability or other indications for fusion were excluded. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Particular attention was paid to the outcomes of patients with Schizas Grade D stenosis.
Results: Of the 134 patients, 128 completed the 12-month follow-up. Mean VAS leg pain improved from 7.92 to 0.63 (p<0.001), while mean ODI improved from 69.66 to 39.34 (p<0.001). Among the 42 patients with Schizas Grade D stenosis, two patients (4.8%) required revision surgery, with one patient (2.4%) subsequently undergoing instrumented fusion. Two dural tears (4.8%) occurred in this subgroup. No patient developed postoperative instability requiring unplanned fusion during the follow-up period.
Conclusions: UBE provides safe and effective decompression for carefully selected patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, including severe Schizas Grade D disease, resulting in significant pain relief and functional improvement. The low revision and subsequent fusion rates observed in this series suggest that motion-preserving decompression may be a viable treatment strategy for selected stable spines, although larger comparative studies with longer follow-up are required.
References
Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgström F, Fritzell P, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1413-23.
Karlsson T, Försth P, Skorpil M, Pazarlis K, Öhagen P, Michaëlsson K, et al. Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial with two-year MRI follow-up. Bone Jt J. 2022;104-B(12):1343-51.
Pao JL, Lin SM, Chen WC, Chang CH. Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. J Spine Surg. 2020;6(2):438-46.
Choi CM, Chung JT, Lee SJ, Choi DJ. How I do it? Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158(3):459-63.
Kim JE, Choi DJ, Park EJJ, Lee HJ, Hwang JH, Kim MC, et al. Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Asian Spine J. 2019;13(2):334-42.
Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis?: a randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32(1):1-8.
Hu Y, Fu H, Yang D, Xu W. Clinical efficacy and imaging outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis. Front Surg. 2023;9:1061566.
Park DK, Weng C, Zakko P, Choi DJ. Unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023;13(2).
Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, Tansey R, Wardlaw D, Smith FW, et al. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images: Spine. 2010;35(21):1919-24.
Wang YP, Qin SL, Yang S, Xu YF, Han PF. Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy compared with microscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and updated meta‑analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2023;26(1):309.
Aaen J, Austevoll IM, Hellum C, Storheim K, Myklebust TÅ, Banitalebi H, et al. Clinical and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: baseline data from the NORDSTEN study. Eur Spine J. 2022;31(6):1391-8.
Kgomotso EL, Hellum C, Fagerland MW, Solberg T, Brox JI, Storheim K, et al. Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Nordsten-DS): five year follow-up of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2024;386:e079771.
Sigmundsson FG, Kang XP, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B. Correlation between disability and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: A prospective study of 109 patients operated on by decompression. Acta Orthop. 2011;82(2):204-10.
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson A, Blood E, Herkowitz H, et al. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine. 2010;35(14):1329-38.
Zaina F, Tomkins-Lane C, Carragee E, Negrini S. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Cochrane Back and Neck Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(1).
Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Keller RB, Chapin AM, Patrick DL, Long JM, et al. The maine lumbar spine study, part III: 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21(15):1787-94.
Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine. 2005;30(8):936-43.
Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson A, Abdu WA, Zhao W, Morgan TS, et al. Long-term outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis: eight-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine. 2015;40(2):63-76.
Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN, et al. Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1424-34.
Karlsson T, Försth P, Öhagen P, Michaëlsson K, Sandén B. Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: five-year clinical results from a randomized clinical trial. Bone Jt J. 2024;106-B(7):705-12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
