Pain attribution in concomitant rotator cuff tears and proximal humeral enchondromas: outcomes of arthroscopic repair alone at 2-year follow-up — a case series

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20262047

Keywords:

Proximal humerus enchondroma, Rotator cuff tear, Supraspinatus repair, Incidental lesions, Shoulder MRI, Arthroscopic repair, Double-row technique

Abstract

Enchondromas of the proximal humerus are benign cartilaginous lesions frequently identified incidentally during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed for shoulder pain. Their coexistence with rotator cuff tears, particularly supraspinatus tears, creates diagnostic uncertainty regarding the primary pain generator and may influence management strategies. Evidence guiding treatment in such dual-pathology scenarios remains limited. This case series evaluates five consecutive patients (mean age 47.4 years) presenting with symptomatic full-thickness supraspinatus tears and incidental proximal humeral enchondromas. All patients underwent arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair without intervention for the osseous lesion, followed by a standardized rehabilitation protocol. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Visual analog scale (VAS) and Oxford shoulder score (OSS) over a 2-year follow-up period. All patients demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes, with VAS scores improving from 8 to 9 preoperatively to 0 to 1 at final follow-up and mean OSS improving from 24.2 to 46.0. No rotator cuff re-tears or lesion-related complications were observed. Serial imaging confirmed radiological stability of the enchondromas, supporting their benign and incidental nature. These findings suggest that in patients with concomitant rotator cuff tears and proximal humeral enchondromas, symptoms are primarily attributable to rotator cuff pathology. Arthroscopic repair alone yields favourable outcomes, while stable enchondromas can be safely managed with observation. Accurate clinic-radiological correlation is essential to avoid unnecessary surgical intervention for incidental benign lesions.

References

Hong ED, Carrino JA, Weber KL, Fayad LM. Prevalence of shoulder enchondromas on routine MR imaging. Clin Imaging. 2011;35(5):378-84.

Levy JC, Temple HT, Mollabashy A, Sanders J, Kransdorf M. The causes of pain in benign solitary enchondromas of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;431(431):181-6.

Omlor GW, Lohnherr V, Lange J, Gantz S, Merle C, Fellenberg J, et al. Enchondromas and atypical cartilaginous tumors at the proximal humerus treated with intralesional resection and bone cement filling with or without osteosynthesis: retrospective analysis of 42 cases with 6 years mean follow-up. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):139.

Zhao J, Luo M, Liang G, Wu M, Pan J, Zeng L-F, et al. Risk factors for supraspinatus tears: A meta-analysis of Observational Studies. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(10):23259671211042826.

Balevi Batur E, Bekin Sarıkaya PZ, Kaygısız ME, Albayrak Gezer I, Levendoglu F. Diagnostic dilemma: Which clinical tests are most accurate for diagnosing supraspinatus muscle tears and tendinosis when compared to magnetic resonance imaging?. Cureus. 2022;14(6):e25903.

Pandey A, Adla DN, Pandey R. Can clinical tests show high diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears?. J Musculoskelet Surg Res. 2023;7(157):157-63.

Sgroi M, Loitsch T, Reichel H, Kappe T. Diagnostic value of clinical tests for supraspinatus tendon tears. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(8):2326-33.

Park HB, Yokota A, Gill HS, El Rassi G, McFarland EG. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the different degrees of subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(7):1446-55.

LaPrade CM, Andryk LM, Christensen JL, Neilson JC, Wooldridge AN, Hackbarth DA, et al. Natural history of intraosseous low-grade chondroid lesions of the proximal humerus. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1200286.

Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T, Yanagawa T, Nakajima D, Shitara H, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(1):116-20.

Akoh CC, Craig E, Troester AM, Miller BJ. Radiographic enchondroma surveillance: Assessing clinical outcomes and costs effectiveness. Iowa Orthop J. 2019;39(1):185-93.

Xu C, Zhao J, Li D. Meta-analysis comparing single-row and double-row repair techniques in the arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(2):182-8.

Sheibani-Rad S, Giveans MR, Arnoczky SP, Bedi A. Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trials. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(2):343-8.

Sun Z, Fu W, Tang X, Chen G, Li J. Systematic review and Meta-analysis on acromioplasty in arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Acta Orthop Belg. 2018;84(1):54-61.

Baig M, Mohan K, Groarke P, Mullet H. Does acromioplasty enhance arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2025;28(4):457-63.

Schmidt CC, Jarrett CD, Brown BT. Management of rotator cuff tears. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(2):399-408.

Zhang K, De Sa D, Kanakamedala A, Sheean AJ, Vyas D. Management of concomitant preoperative rotator cuff pathology and adhesive capsulitis: A systematic review of indications, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(3):979-93.

Littlewood C, Bateman M, Clark D, Selfe J, Watkinson D, Walton M, et al. Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Shoulder Elbow. 2015;7(2):115-24.

Parsons BO, Gruson KI, Chen DD, Harrison AK, Gladstone J, Flatow EL. Does slower rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair lead to long-term stiffness?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(7):1034-9.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Saran, J. S. R. G., Issac, N. V., Annaiah, R. H., Nithyanand, S., Chandru, V., & Suresh, S. M. (2026). Pain attribution in concomitant rotator cuff tears and proximal humeral enchondromas: outcomes of arthroscopic repair alone at 2-year follow-up — a case series. International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 12(4), 1101–1106. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20262047