DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20173934

A prospective study of arthroscopic evaluation of patients with chronic shoulder pain

Pramod Bhor, Sachin Y. Kale, Shikhar D. Singh, Sanjay B. Dhar, Abhinav Garg, Divyesh Bukalsaria

Abstract


Background: Shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint that may be due either to intrinsic disorders of the shoulder or referred pain. In this study, we aimed to find out the sensitivity and specificity of the clinical and radiological methods in diagnosing the chronic shoulder problems and to compare clinical and radiological diagnosis with arthroscopic diagnosis.

Methods: After obtaining approval of the institutional ethics committee, we enrolled patients who presented with chronic shoulder pain in the outpatient clinic of Department of Orthopedics, DY Patil Medical College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai from August 2003 till August 2005. We obtained historical data of each patient in detail and made clinical, radiological and arthroscopic diagnosis. The findings from each diagnostic modality were compared and analysed.

Results: During the study period, 34 patients were enrolled in the study. Injury was traumatic in 32% of the patients and 50% of all patients were heavy workers by occupation. Half of all the patients had pain in shoulder for more than 6 months. Clinical diagnosis of biceps tendinitis was made in 44% of patients, but radiological and arthroscopic diagnosis of biceps tendinitis was made in 18% and 12% respectively. Impingement was diagnosed in 29% patients clinically, in 15% patients radiologically and in 21% patients arthroscopically. Rotator cuff injury was diagnosed in 26% patients clinically, in 41% patients radiologically and in 67% patients arthroscopically.

Conclusions: Findings from this single centre study suggest that arthroscopy can diagnose and treat conditions causing chronic shoulder pain, which is cost effective as well.


Keywords


Accuracy, Arthroscopy, Diagnosis, Shoulder, Pain

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson BC. Office Orthopedics for Primary Care: Diagnosis, 3rd, WB Saunders, Philadelphia 2005.

Iannotti JP, Zlatkin MB, Esterhai JL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:17.

Blanchard TK, Bearcroft PW, Constant CR, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of MRI and arthrography in the investigation of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:638.

Malhi AM, Khan R. Correlation between clinical diagnosis and arthroscopic findings of the shoulder. Postgraduate Med J. 2005;81(960):657-9.

Suder PA, Frich LH, Hougaard K, Lundorf E, Jakobsen BW. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of capsulolabral tears after traumatic primary anterior shoulder dislocation: a prospective comparison with arthroscopy of 25 cases. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 1995;4(6):419-28.

Johnson TR. The shoulder. In: Essentials of Musculoskeletal Care, Snider RK. (Ed), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont. 1997.

Worland RL, Lee D, Orozco CG, SozaRex F, Keenan J. Correlation of age, acromial morphology, and rotator cuff tear pathology diagnosed by ultrasound in asymptomatic patients. J South Orthop Assoc. 2003;12:23.

Fraenkel L, Lavalley M, Felson D. The use of radiographs to evaluate shoulder pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16:560.

Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, Patel M, Wright RW, Yamaguchi K. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(4):498-504.

Fischer CA, Weber MA, Neubecker C, Bruckner T, Tanner M, Zeifang F. Ultrasound vs. MRI in the assessment of rotator cuff structure prior to shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of orthopaedics. 2015;12(1):23-30.