Functional outcome, disability and quality of life after primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study from North India

Authors

  • Vaibhav Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Lokesh Thakur Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Vipan K. Dumpha Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Jasbir Singh Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Rajat Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20262031

Keywords:

Total hip arthroplasty, Functional outcome, Quality of life, Disability

Abstract

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an established intervention for end-stage hip diseases. While functional outcomes are well documented, there are limited Indian data comprehensively evaluating disability and quality of life using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).  This study aimed to prospectively assess functional outcomes, disability, and quality of life following primary total hip arthroplasty in a North Indian population.

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 56 patients who underwent primary THA at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College during the period of January 2022 to October 2023 were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months,1 year and 1.5 years postoperatively.  Functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris hip score (HHS), disability using the World Health Organization (WHO) disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), and quality of life using the WHOQOL-BREF. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results: The mean HHS improved from 48.25 preoperatively to 89.25 at the final follow-up, representing an improvement of 86% in function. The mean WHODAS score decreased from 37.6 to 5.58 at the final follow-up, representing an 85% reduction in disability. All WHOQOL-BREF domains showed significant improvement.

Conclusion: Primary THA significantly improves hip function, reduces disability, and enhances the quality of life. A Comprehensive PROM -based assessment provides a multidimensional evaluation of surgical outcomes in the Indian population.

References

Harkess JW, Crocaralle JR. Arthroplasty of the hip. In: Canale T, editor. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. 10th ed. International ed. St. Louis: Mosby. 2013:180-290.

Petty W. Total joint replacement-VI: lower extremity replacement. The hip. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1991:189-465.

McKee GK, Watson-Farrar J. Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee-Farrar prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1966;48:245-59.

Charnley J. Total hip replacement. JAMA. 1974;230(7):1025-8.

Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 1979:332-45.

Ackerman IN, Bohensky MA, de Steiger R, Brand CA, Eskelinen A, Fenstad AM, et al. Lifetime Risk of Primary Total Hip Replacement Surgery for Osteoarthritis From 2003 to 2013: A Multinational Analysis Using National Registry Data. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017;69(11):1659-67.

Culliford DJ, Maskell J, Kiran A, Judge A, Javaid MK, Cooper C, et al. The lifetime risk of total hip and knee arthroplasty: results from the UK general practice research database. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20(6):519-24.

Engelbert DJ, Weber FA, Jakim I. Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72-B:41-5.

Peters CL, Rivero DP, Kull LR, Rosenberg AG. Revision total hip arthroplasty without cement: subsidence of proximally porous-coated femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77-A:8.

Vinjamuri ARS, Sivanandan MH, Chiranjeevi KP, Sangolgi N, Athipathi S. Functional outcome in total hip arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop Surg. 2021;7(4):312-9.

Li F, Zhu L, Geng Y, Wang G. Effect of hip replacement surgery on clinical efficacy, VAS score and Harris hip score in patients with femoral head necrosis. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(4):3851-5.

Meena UK, Sen RK, Behera P, Tripathy SK, Aggrawal S, Rajoli SR. WHOQOL-BREF Hindi questionnaire: quality of life assessment in acetabular fracture patients. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49(3):323-8.

Abdulkarim A, Ellanti P, Motterlini N, Fahey T, O'Byrne JM. Cemented versus uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013;5(1):e8.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Vaibhav, Thakur, L., Dumpha, V. K., Singh, J., & Rajat. (2026). Functional outcome, disability and quality of life after primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study from North India . International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 12(4), 1008–1011. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20262031

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles