Conventional versus robotic total knee arthroplasty – a comparative study of accuracy, alignment and early functional results

Sathi Venu G. K. Reddy; Nageswara R. Vutharkar; Satya S. T. Rongala; Praveen T. Kunapareddy; Pedapati S. Chandra

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263903

Authors

Sathi Venu G. K. Reddy Department of Orthopaedics, G. S. L. Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
Nageswara R. Vutharkar Department of Orthopaedics, G. S. L. Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
Satya S. T. Rongala Department of Orthopaedics, G. S. L. Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
Praveen T. Kunapareddy Department of Orthopaedics, G. S. L. Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
Pedapati S. Chandra Department of Orthopaedics, G. S. L. Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263903

Keywords:

Conventional total knee arthroplasty, Robotic total knee arthroplasty, TKA, Oxford knee score, Knee society score

Abstract

Background: Restoration of mechanical alignment and optimization of functional outcomes are critical for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Robotic systems aim to improve the accuracy of bone cuts and reduce malalignment. Evidence from Indian populations remains limited.

Methods: The present study was a prospective, non-randomized control study. The sample size was 43 knees in each group (robotic and traditional), for a total of 86 knees, using a two-sided α=0.05 and power of 80%. Functional outcomes were evaluated with oxford knee score (OKS) and knee society score (KSS) at 0 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Perioperative variables, including operative time, blood loss, length of stay, pain score and complications, were recorded.

Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. Robotic TKA demonstrated fewer alignment outliers (11.6% versus 25.6%, p=0.166) and significantly lower mean absolute HKA error (1.4°±1.1 versus 2.4°±1.7, p=0.002). Functional outcomes improved in both groups over time. Robotic TKA showed higher OKS at 6 weeks (32.2±3.5 versus 29.9±4.3, p=0.009) and higher KSS at 6 weeks (75.6±9.7 versus 69.6±7.9, p=0.003) and 6 months (90.3±4.9 versus 85.0±5.6, p<0.001). Robotic TKA required longer operative time (94.2±9.4 versus 81.9±9.7 min, p<0.001) but resulted in lower blood loss (293.9±52.2 versus 350.5±46.3 ml, p<0.001). Length of stay and complication rates were similar between groups.

Conclusions: Robotic TKA improves alignment accuracy and enhances early functional outcomes compared to conventional techniques, with acceptable perioperative safety in Indian settings.

References

Alrajeb R, Zarti M, Zakaria S, Alzobi O, Ahmed G, Elmhiregh A. Robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023;33(8):2311-22.

Geng X, Zheng Y, Li Y, Zhao M, Liu Y, Li Z, et al. Early radiographic and clinical outcomes of robotic-arm-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Orthop Surg. 2024;16(4):721-9.

Lei K, Liu L, Chen X, Feng Q, Yang L, Guo L. Navigation and robotics improved alignment compared with PSI and conventional instrument, while clinical outcomes were similar in TKA: a network meta-analysis. KSSTA. 2021;30(2):721-33.

Kayani B, Konan S, Ayuob A, Onochie E, Al-Jabri T, Haddad FS. Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4(10):611-7.

Riantho A, Christian J, Fidiasrianto K, Elson E, Irvan I, Haryono H, et al. Radiographic outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. JB JS Open Access. 2023;8(2):e23.00025.

Braathen DL, Clapp IM, Singh A, Blackburn BE, Peters CL, Archibeck MJ. Common adjustments made in robotic total knee arthroplasty to achieve functional alignment and minimize soft tissue releases. J Arthroplasty. 2024;39(7):S55-62.

Cho KJ, Seon JK, Jang WY, Park CG, Song EK. Robotic versus conventional primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological long-term results with a minimum follow-up of ten years. Int Orthop. 2019;43(6):1345-54.

Liow MH, Chin PL, Tay KJ, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Early experiences with robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty using the DigiMatch™ ROBODOC® surgical system. Singapore Med J. 2014;55(10):529-34.

Vaidya NV, Deshpande AN, Panjwani T, Patil A. Robotic-assisted TKA leads to a better prosthesis alignment and a better joint line restoration as compared to conventional TKA: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30(3):621-6.

Chandrashekar P, Babu KA, Nagaraja HS, Hiral SG, Karthikeyan S, Bajwa S. Comparison of conventional and robotic knee arthroplasty results: a retrospective observational study. Indian J Orthop. 2023;57(11):1800-8.

Rajgopal A, Aggarwal V, Gautam D. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: an update. Indian J Orthop. 2022;56(4):565-74.

Soundarrajan D, Dhanasekararaja P, Rajasekaran S. Early outcomes of robotic vs conventional TKA in varus knees: an Indian perspective. J Arthroplasty. 2024;39(5):1120-6.

Dhanasekararaja P, Rajasekaran RB, Soundarrajan D. Precision in robotic TKA for Indian patients: alignment and functional recovery. Knee. 2023;45:78-85.

Thilak J, Chithartha K, Nair AS. Long-term cross-sectional study with modified forgotten joint score after robotic TKA in Indian cohort. Indian J Orthop. 2021;55(1):S45-52.

Bensa A, Sangiorgio A, Deabate L, Illuminati A, Pompa B, Filardo G. Robotic-assisted mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty does not lead to better clinical and radiological outcomes when compared to conventional TKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(6):4680-91.

Hampp EL, Sodhi N, Scholl L, et al. No clinically meaningful differences in outcomes between robotic-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty at 1-year follow-up: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(8):1658-66.

Kim YH, Yoon SH, Park JW. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty does not improve clinical outcomes compared to conventional techniques: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up. Int Orthop. 2022;46(5):965-72.