Surgical approaches and postoperative outcomes in acromioclavicular joint fractures: a retrospective study of patient demographics, effectiveness and plate removal timing

Authors

  • Habib Alismaily Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
  • Sujith Shahul Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
  • Adhya Miriam Tom College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
  • Sofia Sajid Ali College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
  • Jagat Gopinath College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20261205

Keywords:

Acromioclavicular joint fracture, Shoulder range of motion, Plate removal timing, Hook plate fixation, Postoperative outcomes

Abstract

Background: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint fractures and dislocations are common shoulder injuries, particularly among young active males. Despite the widespread use of various fixation techniques, optimal management and implant removal timing remain topics of ongoing debate. This study retrospectively evaluates patient demographics, surgical approaches, postoperative outcomes, and plate removal timing among individuals treated for AC joint fractures at a major trauma center.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at Rashid Hospital, Dubai, including 187 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent operative or conservative management for AC joint fractures between 2018 and 2025. Sociodemographic data, treatment modality, surgical technique, complications, functional outcomes, and implant removal times were extracted from electronic medical records. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS v29.

Results: The cohort was predominantly male (93%), with most patients aged ≤40 years (69%). Hook plates were the primary fixation method (86.6%). Postoperatively, 47.8% reported pain, while 52.2% remained pain-free. Range-of-motion limitations were noted in 45.2% of patients, with adduction deficits being most common. Reoperation was primarily for implant removal, occurred in 79.7% of cases. Most plate removals occurred between 4–6 months, peaking at 5 months (41 cases). Early removal at 3 months was uncommon, and 37 patients had no removal at the time of review.

Conclusions: Hook plate fixation remains the predominant surgical approach for AC joint fractures at our institution, with generally favorable postoperative outcomes. Functional recovery was preserved in over half of the patients, and implant removal most occurred within 4–6 months. These findings highlight the importance of timely postoperative evaluation and individualized decision-making regarding plate removal to optimize long-term outcomes.

References

Phadke A, Bakti N, Bawale R, Singh B. Current concepts in management of ACJ injuries. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10:480-5.

Martetschläger F, Kraus N, Scheibel M, Streich J, Venjakob A, Maier D. The diagnosis and treatment of acute dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. Deutsch Aerztebl Int. 2019;116(8):89-96.

Johansen JA, Grutter PW, McFarland EG, Petersen SA. Acromioclavicular joint injuries: indications for treatment and treatment options. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(2):70-82.

Chillemi C, Franceschini V, Dei Giudici L, Alibardi A, Salate Santone F, Ramos Alday LJ, et al. Epidemiology of isolated acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Emerg Med Int. 2013;2013:171609.

Enger M, Skjaker SA, Melhuus K, Nordsletten L, Pripp AH, Moosmayer S, et al. Shoulder injuries from birth to old age: a 1-year prospective study of 3031 shoulder injuries in an urban population. Injury. 2018;49(7):1324-9.

Tossy JD, Mead NC, SIGMoND HM. 11 Acromioclavicular Separations: Useful and Practical Classification for Treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1963;28:111-9.

Pan X, Lv RY, Lv MG, Zhang DG. TightRope vs clavicular hook plate for Rockwood III-V acromioclavicular dislocations: a meta‐analysis. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(4):1045-52.

Shen G, Sun S, Tang C, Zhang F, Chen S, Li J, et al. Comparison of the Tight Rope system versus hook plate in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a retrospective analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:11397.

Good DW, Lui DF, Leonard M, Morris S, McElwain JP. Clavicle hook plate fixation for displaced lateral-third clavicle fractures (Neer type II): a functional outcome study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(8):1045-8.

Zhang L, Xiao H, Gao Y, Zhang H, Tang P. Late function and complications of hook plate implantation for distal-third clavicle fractures: a retrospective study. Acta Orthop Belg. 2018;84(4):485-90.

Lee SJ, Eom TW, Hyun YS. Complications and frequency of surgical treatment with AO-type hook plate in shoulder trauma: a retrospective study. J Clin Med. 2022;11:1026.

Boufadel P, Fares MY, Daher M, Lopez R, Khan AZ, Abboud JA. Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint separations presenting to emergency departments in the United States. Orthop J Sports Med. 2025;13:17585732251320015.

Nordin JS, Olsson O, Lunsjö K. Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: incidence, injury profile, and patient characteristics from a prospective case series. JSES Int. 2020;4(2):246-50.

Mannan M, Afridi A, Ahmed KT, Eisha S, ishfaq Mazari M. Functional Outcomes of the Management of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation With a Clavicle Hook Plate: A Retrospective Study. Cureus. 2024;16:e16.

Liu S, Li C, Song Z, Bai X, Wu H. Comparison of open reduction and fixation with hook plate and modified closed reduction and fixation with tightrope loop plate for treatment of rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23:301.

Ko SH, Lee CC, Jeon YD, Han JW, Lee KJ. Long-term clinical outcomes after TightRope versus hook plate fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023;11:23259671231165097.

Essawy OM. Hook plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligaments repair and: augmentation for management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Egypt Orthop J. 2020;55:244-52.

Kienast B, Thietje R, Queitsch C, Gille J, Schulz AP, Meiners J. Mid-term results after operative treatment of rockwood grade III-V acromioclavicular joint dislocations with an AC-hook-plate. Eur J Med Res. 2011;16:52.

Villagrán-Luján MA, Alarcon-Mendoza A, Perez-Gutierrez EA, Gutierrez-Moreno MA, Portillo-Ortiz NK, Berumen-Nafarrate E. Comparative meta-analysis of TightRope vs. hook plate for acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2025;42:8-14.

Chen CH, Dong QR, Zhou RK, Zhen HQ, Jiao YJ. Effects of hook plate on shoulder function after treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Int J clin Exp Med. 2014;7(9):2564-70.

Metzlaff S, Rosslenbroich S, Forkel PH, Schliemann B, Arshad H, Raschke M, et al. Surgical treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: hook plate versus minimally invasive reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(6):1972-8.

Oh JH, Min S, Jung JW, Kim HJ, Kim JY, Chung SW, et al. Clinical an radiological results of hook plate fixation in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations and distal clavicle fractures. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2018;21:95-100.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-27

How to Cite

Alismaily, H., Shahul, S., Tom, A. M., Ali, S. S., & Gopinath, J. (2026). Surgical approaches and postoperative outcomes in acromioclavicular joint fractures: a retrospective study of patient demographics, effectiveness and plate removal timing. International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 12(3), 584–589. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20261205

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles