A prospective and observational study of clinical and functional outcome of meta carpal fracture treated with osteosynthesis using plate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20261218Keywords:
Metacarpal fractures, Plate osteosynthesis, Open reduction internal fixation, Total active flexion, Functional outcome, Hand fracturesAbstract
Background: Metacarpal fractures are among the most common hand injuries encountered in orthopaedic practice and can significantly impair hand function if not managed appropriately. Stable fixation with early mobilization is essential for optimal functional recovery, particularly in unstable fracture patterns. Plate osteosynthesis provides rigid fixation and allows early rehabilitation, but its clinical and functional outcomes require systematic evaluation.
Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics at a tertiary care centre over a defined study period. A total of 20 skeletally mature patients with closed metacarpal fractures were included. All patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation using mini-plates and screws. Patients were followed up at regular intervals for a minimum period of three months. Clinical evaluation, radiological assessment of fracture union, postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, return to work, and functional outcomes were assessed. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Total Active Flexion (TAF) scoring system recommended by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.
Results: The majority of patients were young to middle-aged adults, with a male predominance. Transverse fractures and shaft-level involvement were the most common fracture characteristics. Radiological union was achieved within 6-7 weeks in 75% of patients. Excellent functional outcomes were observed in 75% of digits 2-5 and in all cases involving the thumb. Overall, 85% of patients achieved satisfactory functional outcomes. Most patients (70%) returned to work within 6-8 weeks. Postoperative complications were minimal, with stiffness observed in 15% of patients and infection in 5%. No cases of non-union, malunion, or implant failure were reported.
Conclusions: Plate osteosynthesis is a safe and effective method for the management of metacarpal fractures, providing stable fixation, early mobilization, and excellent functional outcomes with a low complication rate. Meticulous surgical technique and structured postoperative rehabilitation play a crucial role in achieving optimal results.
References
Jupiter JB, Hastings H. The management of fractures of the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(6):801-9.
Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(5):908-15.
Larsen CF, Mulder S, Johansen AM, Stam C. The epidemiology of hand injuries in The Netherlands and Denmark. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(4):323-7.
Low CK, Wong HP, Low YP. The boxer's fracture revisited. Hand Surg. 1997;2(1):23-6.
Patil RK, Yadav SS. Epidemiology of hand injuries in a tertiary care centre in India. Indian J Orthop. 2013;47(4):377-82.
Gajendran VK, Szabo RM, Myo GK. Hand injuries in India: epidemiology and prevention. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(6):1027-35.
Gupta R, Singh R, Siwach R. Pattern of hand injuries in northern India. J Orthop Surg. 2012;20(1):21-4.
Patel MR, Desai SS. Clinical profile of metacarpal fractures in a tertiary care centre of Gujarat. Gujarat Med J. 2016;71(1):45-9.
Shah KN, Patel A, Mehta N. Functional outcome of metacarpal fractures: a regional study from western India. Int J Orthop Sci. 2018;4(1):312-6.
Fusetti C, Meyer H, Borisch N, Stern R, Santa DD, Papaloïzos M. Complications of plate fixation in metacarpal fractures. J Trauma. 2002;52(3):535-9.
Ozer K, Gillani S, Williams A, Peterson SL. Comparison of intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(10):1724-31.
Fusetti C, Meyer H, Borisch N, Stern R, Santa DD, Papaloïzos M. Complications of plate fixation in metacarpal fractures. J Trauma. 2002;52(3):535-9.
Agrawal AK, Nagi ON. Open reduction and internal fixation of metacarpal fractures using mini-plates and screws. Indian J Orthop. 2007;41(3):239-42.
Dumont C, Fuchs M, Burchhardt H, Stürmer KM. Clinical results of plate fixation of metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(6):542-6.
Souer JS, Mudgal CS. Plate fixation in closed metacarpal shaft fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(5):725-9.
Mergić J, Mesić E, Prlić I, Borić I. Plate fixation of metacarpal fractures: functional outcome and complications. Acta Clin Croat. 2015;54(3):305-10.
Stern PJ, Wiesler ER, Reilly DG. Complications of plate fixation in metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24(4):704-9.
Knopp W, Neumann L, Schweiger K. Kirschner wire fixation versus plate fixation of metacarpal fractures. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2007;39(3):170-6.
Bosscha K, Snellen JP. Internal fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with K-wires and plates: a comparative study. Injury. 1993;24(6):365-8.
Stern PJ, Hastings H. Fixation of metacarpal fractures: comparison of K-wire and plate osteosynthesis. J Hand Surg Br. 1998;23(1):76-9.
Trevisan C, Morganti A, Casiraghi A, Marinoni EC. Low-profile plate fixation in metacarpal fractures: a prospective study. J Hand Surg Br. 2004;29(2):152-6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
