A morphology-based classification system and management strategy for postero-medial tibial plateau fractures

Purushotham Lal Ramachandra; Ihjas Ismail; Ashish Dodiya

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263902

Authors

Purushotham Lal Ramachandra Department of Orthopedics, Narayana Health City, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Ihjas Ismail Department of Orthopedics, Narayana Health City, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Ashish Dodiya Devine Spine and Hip Superspeciality Clinic, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20263902

Keywords:

Novel classification for posteromedial tibial plateau fractures, Posteromedial tibial plateau fracture, Proximal tibia fracture classification

Abstract

Background: Posteromedial tibial plateau fractures represent a distinct subset of proximal tibial injuries, characterized by coronal-plane fracture orientation and complex fragment morphology that may be overlooked on standard radiographs. Earlier classification systems such as the Schatzker and pre-2018 AO/OTA schemes did not adequately describe posterior or posteromedial fracture patterns, limiting their usefulness in surgical planning. However, the revised 2018 AO/OTA classification introduced axial-plane modifiers to specifically identify posteromedial involvement. Despite this advancement, considerable heterogeneity remains in fracture morphology and intraoperative behavior, highlighting the need for a dedicated morphology-based classification that more directly correlates fracture pattern with fixation strategy and clinical outcome.

Methods: Forty adult patients with postero-medial tibial plateau fractures were prospectively studied. Fractures were classified by sagittal position of fracture line (L1-L3), apex orientation on AP view (A1-A2), and displacement on CT (Da <2 mm, Db >2 mm). Surgical approach and fixation strategy were selected accordingly, and intraoperative stability was assessed under fluoroscopy. Outcomes were evaluated with radiographs, range of motion, and Knee Society Score (KSS) at 6 months.

Results: Of 40 patients (mean age 41 years), 24 fractures involved L1, 11 L2, and 5 L3 regions; 27 had medial apex (A1) and 13 lateral apex (A2). L1Db and L2 fractures showed marked instability, while L3Da patterns remained stable through flexion. All unstable patterns required buttress plating, with surgical approach dictated by apex orientation. Radiological union occurred in all cases at a mean of 14 weeks. At 6 months, 85% of patients achieved excellent or good outcomes; complications included stiffness in three cases and ACL laxity in one.

Conclusions: This morphology-based classification reliably correlates fracture patterns with stability, surgical approach, and rehabilitation needs. It offers a practical framework for individualized management of posteromedial tibial plateau fractures and may improve functional outcomes. Further multicenter validation is recommended.

References

Rudran B, Little C, Wiik A, Logishetty K. Tibial plateau fracture: anatomy, diagnosis and management. Br J Hosp Med. 2020;81(10):1-9.

Wasserstein D, Henry P, Paterson JM, Kreder HJ, Jenkinson R. Risk of total knee arthroplasty after operatively treated tibial plateau fracture: a matched-population-based cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(2):144-50.

Kfuri M, Schatzker J. Revisiting the Schatzker classification of tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2018;49(12):2252-63.

Mthethwa J, Chikate A. A review of the management of tibial plateau fractures. Musculoskelet Surg. 2018;102(2):119-27.

Iliopoulos E, Galanis N. Physiotherapy after tibial plateau fracture fixation: A systematic review of the literature. SAGE Open Med. 2020;8:2050312120965316.

Coobs BR, LaPrade RF, Griffith CJ, Nelson BJ. Biomechanical analysis of an isolated fibular (lateral) collateral ligament reconstruction using an autogenous semitendinosus graft. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(9):1521-7.

Gahr P, Kopf S, Pauly S. Current concepts review. Management of proximal tibial fractures. Front Surg. 2023;10:1138274.

Mansur H, Corrêa VLB, Abdo B, Ramos LS, Castiglia MT. Evaluation of the reproducibility of the Schatzker classification reviewed by Kfuri for tibial plateau fractures. Rev Bras Ortop. 2021;57(3):502-10.

Yao X, Xu Y, Yuan J, Lv B, Fu X, Wang L, et al. Classification of tibia plateau fracture according to the “four-column and nine-segment”. Injury. 2018;49(12):2275-83.

Moore M. Fracture-dislocation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;156:128-40.

Luo CF, Sun H, Zhang B, Zeng BF. Three-column fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(11):683-92.

Chen HW, Chen CQ, Yi XH. Posterior tibial plateau fracture: a new treatment-oriented classification and surgical management. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(1):472-9.

Vosoughi F, Menbari Oskouie I, Rahimdoost N, Pesantez R. Decoding tibial plateau fracture classifications: a century of individualized insights in a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev. 2025;10(5):316-26.

Cuéllar VG, Martinez D, Immerman I, Oh C, Walker PS, Egol KA. A biomechanical study of posteromedial tibial plateau fracture stability: do they all require fixation? J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(7):325-30.

Barei DP, Nork SE, Mills WJ. Functional outcomes of severe bicondylar tibial plateau fractures treated with dual incisions and medial and lateral plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1713-21.

Brad JY, Daphne MB, David PB. Stabilization of the posteromedial fragment in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: a mechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking single and dual plating methods. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;69:148-55.