Comparison of immediate effect of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization versus muscle energy technique along with hot pack on pain and range of motion in individuals with heel pain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20261216Keywords:
Heel pain, Manual therapy, Pain modulation, Tissue extensibilityAbstract
Background: Heel pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint that affects daily activities and mobility. Various therapeutic interventions, including instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and muscle energy technique (MET), are employed to alleviate pain and improve range of motion (ROM). However, limited studies compare their immediate effectiveness. This study aimed to compare the immediate effects of IASTM versus MET along with hot pack on pain and ankle dorsiflexion ROM in individuals with unilateral heel pain.
Methods: A total of 60 participants with unilateral heel pain were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (IASTM) and Group B (MET with hot pack), with 30 participants in each. Pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and ankle dorsiflexion ROM was measured using a clinometer smartphone application. Pre- and post-intervention assessments were conducted. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-tests were used for within-group comparisons, while the Mann-Whitney U Test and unpaired t-test were used for between-group comparisons.
Results: Both interventions significantly reduced pain and improved dorsiflexion ROM (p<0.001). However, the IASTM group exhibited a greater reduction in VAS scores (Z=-4.893, p<0.001) and significant increase in dorsiflexion ROM (t =-40.934, p<0.001) compared to the MET with hot pack group (Z=-4.977, p<0.001) (t=-15.642, p<0.001). Between-group analysis further confirmed that IASTM was superior to MET with a hot pack in both pain reduction (U=153, p<0.001) and ROM improvement (t=3.604, p=0.001).
Conclusions: Both IASTM and MET with a hot pack are effective in reducing heel pain and improving dorsiflexion ROM.
References
Sullivan J, Pappas E, Burns J. Role of mechanical factors in the clinical presentation of plantar heel pain: Implications for management. The Foot (Edinb). 2020;42(1):101636.
Shivani B, Pratik P, Neha C. A case report on efficacy of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization in a patient having heel pain. J Med Pharma Allied Sci. 2022;11(1):4531-3.
Alqahtani, Turki A. The prevalence of foot pain and its associated factors among Saudi school teachers in Abha sector, Saudi Arabia. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2020;9(9):4641-7.
Pearce CJ, Seow D, Lau BP. Correlation between gastrocnemius tightness and heel pain severity in plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 2021;42(1):76-82.
Patel A, DiGiovanni B. Association between plantar fasciitis and isolated contracture of the gastrocnemius. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(1):5-8.
Cohen JC. Anatomy and biomechanical aspects of the gastro soleus complex. Foot Ankle Clin. 2009;14(4):617-26.
Pascual Huerta J. The effect of the gastrocnemius on the plantar fascia. Foot Ankle Clinics. 2014;19(4):701-18.
Lee JH, Chang JS. The effect of calf stiffness on gait, foot pressure and balance in adults. J Korean Phys Ther. 2019;31(6):346-50.
Cheatham SW, Lee M, Cain M, Baker R. The efficacy of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization: a systematic review. J Canadian Chirop Asso. 2016;60(3):200-11.
Cheatham SW, Kreiswirth E, Baker R. Does a light pressure instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization technique modulate tactile discrimination and perceived pain in healthy individuals with DOMS. J Canadian Chiropract Assoc. 2019;63(1):18-25.
Gulick DT. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization increases myofascial trigger point pain threshold. J Bodyw Movement Therap. 2018;22(2):341-5.
Faqih AI, Bedekar N, Shyam A, Sancheti P. Effects of muscle energy technique on pain, range of motion and function in patients with post-surgical elbow stiffness: A randomized controlled trial. Hong Kong Physioth J. 2019;39(1):25-33.
Fryer G. Muscle energy technique: An evidence- informed approach. Int J Osteopat Med. 2011;14(1):3-9.
Poonam T, Kaur R, Ghodey S. Immediate effect of muscle energy technique on quadratus lumborum muscle in patients with non-specific low back pain. Indian J Phys Occupat Ther. 2020;14(1):180-4.
Hansen MA. Comparison of shortwave diathermy and instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization on improving hamstring range of motion. North Dakota: North Dakota State University. 2019. Available at https://hdl.handle.net. Accessed on 21 August 2025.
Bates HA. The effects of thermostim instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization and superficial heat on range of motion of the hamstrings and perceived patient comfort. North Dakota: North Dakota state university. Avaialble at https://hdl.handle.net. Accessed on 21 September 2025.
Ummara Q, Anan A, Iman Z. Effectiveness of Heat therapy on musculoskeletal pain before and after exercise therapy in females. Int Islamic Med J. 2020;2(1):30-4.
Lori B, Terry M. Plantar fasciitis and the windlass mechanism: a biomechanical link to clinical practice. J Athl Train. 2004;39(1):77-82.
Fousekis K, Varda C, Mandalidis D, Mylonas K, et al. Effects of instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization at three different application angles on hamstring surface thermal responses. J Phys Ther Sci. 2020;23(8):506-9.
Swinscow, T.D.V. and Campbell, M.J. Statistics at Square. BMJ Books, 2002; 10th Edition. London.
Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974;2(7889):1127-31.
Begum M, Mohammad H. Validity and Reliability of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain measurement. J Med Rep Rev. 2019;2(11):394-402.
Dhage Prasad, Naqvi Waqar, Kulkarni Chaitanya, Arora Sakshi. Smartphone application for computing joint range of motion: a reliability test for its efficacy. J Med Pharma Allied Sci. 2021;10(6):3947-50.
Wang KY, Hussaini SH, Teasdall RD, Gwam CU, Scott AT. Smartphone applications for assessing ankle range of motion in clinical practice. Foot Ankle Orthopaed. 2019;4(3):1-9.
Shah J, Ghumatkar M, Kumar A. Comparison between the immediate effects of instrumented assisted soft tissue mobilization and active release technique in individuals wearing high heels. Int J Heath Sci Res. 2021;11(10):186-95.
Weiqing G, Roth E. A quasi-experimental study on the effects of instrumented assisted soft tissue mobilization on mechanical neurons. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(4):654-7.
Jooyoung K, Dong S, Joohung L. Therapeutic effectiveness of instrument- assisted soft tissue mobilization for soft tissue injury: mechanism and practical application. J Exer Rehabil. 2017;13(1):12-22.
Faqih AI, Bedekar N, Shyam A, Sancheti P. Effects of muscle energy technique on pain, range of motion and function in patients with post-surgical elbow stiffness: A randomized controlled trial. Hong Kong Physioth J. 2019;39(01):25-33.
Nadeem K, Arif MA, Akram S, Arslan S, Ahmad A, Gilani S. Effect of Ergon IASTM technique on pain, strength and range of motion in plantar fasciitis patients. RCT. Physioth Quart. 2023;31(4):28-32.
Naoki I, Shun O, Yozo K. Effects of Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Musculoskeletal Properties. Med Sci Spor Exer. 2019;52(2):2166-72.
Rowlett CA, Hanney WJ, Pabian PS, McArthur JH, Rothschild CE, Kolber MJ. Efficacy of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization in comparison to gastrocnemius-soleus stretching for dorsiflexion range of motion: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Therap. 2019;23(2):233-40.
Ruparelia H, Patel S. Immediate effect of muscle energy technique (MET) and positional release therapy (PRT) on SLR90⁰-90⁰, ankle dorsiflexion range and Y-balance test—an experimental study. Int J Health Sci Res. 2019;9(9):53-8.
Yogita N. The effect of muscle energy technique on calf muscle flexibility, strength and endurance in amateur football players playing on dirt field- one group pretest and posttest study. Int J Creative Res Thou. 2023;11(7):82-90.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
