Nanotechnology-based strategies in orthopaedic surgery: implications for osseointegration, infection prevention and bone regeneration

Muhammad Atif; Dania Iajaz Dar; Youssef Alkheir Taha; Ibraheem Mohammed Alyami; Mohamed I. Abulsoud

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20262040

Authors

Muhammad Atif Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia
Dania Iajaz Dar Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia
Youssef Alkheir Taha Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia
Ibraheem Mohammed Alyami Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia
Mohamed I. Abulsoud Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20262040

Keywords:

Nanotechnology, Orthopaedic implants, Osseointegration, Antimicrobial nanocoating, Bone regeneration, Biomaterials

Abstract

Orthopaedic surgery continues to face challenges related to delayed bone healing, implant loosening, and implant-associated infection, despite advances in surgical techniques and biomaterials. Conventional implant materials are primarily mechanically reliable but biologically passive, limiting their ability to promote osseointegration or actively resist bacterial colonization. Nanotechnology has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance biological performance at the bone–implant interface by modifying material properties at the nanoscale. A systematic review was conducted to synthesise experimental, translational, and early clinical evidence on nanotechnology-based applications in orthopaedic surgery. A structured literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Evidence was thematically analysed and organized into three domains: nanostructured implant surfaces and osseointegration, antimicrobial nanocoatings for infection prevention, and nanofibrous or nanocomposite scaffolds for bone regeneration. Across the reviewed studies, nanoscale surface modifications consistently demonstrated enhanced osteoblast adhesion, early mineralization, and increased bone–implant contact compared with conventional surfaces. Antimicrobial nanocoatings and nanoparticle-based delivery systems showed effective local inhibition of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation while maintaining cytocompatibility. Nanofibrous and nanocomposite scaffolds that mimic the native bone extracellular matrix support cellular infiltration, osteogenic differentiation, and mineral deposition in preclinical models. However, most available evidence remains preclinical or early translational. Nanotechnology-enabled strategies offer promising biological advantages for enhancing osseointegration, reducing implant-related infections, and promoting bone regeneration in orthopaedic surgery. While current findings support their potential clinical value, widespread adoption is limited by the lack of large-scale clinical trials, long-term safety data, and standardised regulatory pathways. Further high-quality clinical studies are required to validate these technologies and define their role in routine orthopaedic practice.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Khan SN, Cammisa FP, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(1):77-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200501000-00010

Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury. 2005;36(3):S20-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029

Jacobs JJ, Roebuck KA, Archibeck M, Hallab NJ, Glant TT. Osteolysis: basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(393):71-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200112000-00008

Mazaheri M, Eslahi N, Ordikhani F, Tamjid E, Simchi A. Nanomedicine applications in orthopedic medicine: state of the art. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:6039-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S73737

Jones CF, Quarrington RD, Tsangari H, Starczak Y, Mulaibrahimovic A, Burzava ALS, et al. A novel nanostructured surface on titanium implants increases osseointegration in a sheep model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480(11):2232-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002327

Hou C, An J, Zhao D, Ma X, Zhang W, Zhao W, et al. Surface modification techniques to produce micro/nano-scale topographies on Ti-based implant surfaces for improved osseointegration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:835008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.835008

Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Implant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: lessons for spine implants. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(8):3363-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.037

Balasundaram G, Webster TJ. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanograined Ti modified with KRSR. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;80(3):602-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30954

Salou L, Hoornaert A, Louarn G, Layrolle P. Enhanced osseointegration of titanium implants with nanostructured surfaces: an experimental study in rabbits. Acta Biomater. 2015;11:494-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.017

Besinis A, De Peralta T, Handy RD. Inhibition of biofilm formation and antibacterial properties of a silver nano-coating on human dentine. Nanotoxicology. 2014;8(7):745-54.

Chen X, Zhou J, Qian Y, Zhao L. Antibacterial coatings on orthopedic implants. Mater Today Bio. 2023;19:100586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100586

Hasan J, Crawford RJ, Ivanova EP. Antibacterial surfaces: the quest for a new generation of biomaterials. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31(5):295-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.01.017

Chouirfa H, Bouloussa H, Migonney V, Falentin-Daudré C. Review of titanium surface modification techniques and coatings for antibacterial applications. Acta Biomater. 2019;83:37-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.036

Laurencin CT, Ashe KM, Henry N, Kan HM, Lo KW. Delivery of small molecules for bone regenerative engineering: preclinical studies and potential clinical applications. Drug Discov Today. 2014;19(6):794-800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2014.01.012

Carbone EJ, Jiang T, Nelson C, Henry N, Lo KW. Small molecule delivery through nanofibrous scaffolds for musculoskeletal regenerative engineering. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2014;10(8):1691-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2014.05.013

Nukavarapu SP, Kumbar SG, Brown JL, Krogman NR, Weikel AL, Hindenlang MD, et al. Polyphosphazene/nano-hydroxyapatite composite microsphere scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9(7):1818-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bm800031t

Huang K, Gu Z, Wu J. Tofu-incorporated hydrogels for potential bone regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(5):3037-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01997

Xia L, Zhou C, Li Q, Liu L, Jiang C, Dai H, et al. Nanotechnology in orthopedic care: advances in drug delivery, implants, and biocompatibility considerations. Int J Nanomed. 2025;20:9251-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S523462

Hamza HM, Malik MM, Asad M, Ali S, Awan AA. Advances in orthopedic implants: the role of nanotechnology in enhancing performance and longevity. Regener Med Rep. 2025;2(1):15-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/REGENMED.REGENMED-D-24-00024

Ji T, Li Y, Xing Z, Tang X, Yang R, Guo W. Assessment of the viability and union feature of diaphysis reconstruction using pasteurized tumor bone and intramedullary free fibular after tumor resection. J Pediatr Orthop. 2021;41(9):e833-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001936

Brochu BM, Sturm SR, Kawase De Queiroz Goncalves JA, Mirsky NA, Sandino AI, Panthaki KZ, et al. Advances in bioceramics for bone regeneration: a narrative review. Biomimetics. 2024;9(11):690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9110690

Li B, Chen Y, He J, Zhang J, Wang S, Xiao W, et al. Biomimetic membranes of methacrylated gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite/poly(L-lactic acid) for enhanced bone regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(12):6737-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00972

Jahanmard F, Dijkmans FM, Majed A, Vogely HC, van der Wal BCH, Stapels DAC, et al. Toward antibacterial coatings for personalized implants. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(10):5486-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00683

Jahanmard F, Croes M, Castilho M, Majed A, Steenbergen MJ, Lietaert K, et al. Bactericidal coating to prevent early and delayed implant-related infections. J Control Release. 2020;326:38-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.06.014

Zhou J, Wang H, Virtanen S, Witek L, Dong H, Thanassi D, et al. Hybrid zinc oxide nanocoating on titanium implants: controlled drug release for enhanced antibacterial and osteogenic performance in infectious conditions. Acta Biomater. 2024;189:589-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2024.09.039

Zhao H, Huang Y, Zhang W, Guo Q, Cui W, Sun Z, et al. Mussel-inspired peptide coatings on titanium implant to improve osseointegration in osteoporotic condition. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4(7):2505-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00261

Li K, Liu S, Hu T, Razanau I, Wu X, Ao H, et al. Optimized nanointerface engineering of micro/nanostructured titanium implants to enhance cell–nanotopography interactions and osseointegration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(2):969-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01717

Pan C, Zhou Z, Yu X. Coatings as the useful drug delivery system for the prevention of implant-related infections. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0930-y

Lian Q, Zheng S, Shi Z, Li K, Chen R, Wang P, et al. Using a degradable three-layer sandwich-type coating to prevent titanium implant infection with the combined efficient bactericidal ability and fast immune remodeling property. Acta Biomater. 2022;154:650-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.033

Hollister SJ. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater. 2005;4(7):518-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1421

Khalid MH, Muzammil S, Siddique MH, Ashraf A, Arooj I, Saqalein M, et al. Breaking barriers: antimicrobial nanocoatings as a revolutionary approach to combat biofilm infections. Prog Org Coat. 2025;209:109571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2025.109571