Perioperative microbiological assessment in open fractures: a prospective comparative study of wound swab and tissue sample cultures

Alvin Thomas; Henry Mathews; Joe Joseph Cherian; Likhith Theodore; Natasha Varghese Issac

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20260511

Authors

Alvin Thomas Department of Orthopaedics, Sree Gokulam Medical College and Research Foundation, Venjaramoodu, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
Henry Mathews Department of Orthopaedics, Al-Azhar Medical College and Super Speciality Hospital, Thodupuzha, Kerala, India
Joe Joseph Cherian Department of Orthopaedics, St. John’s Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Likhith Theodore Department of Orthopaedics, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India
Natasha Varghese Issac Department of Orthopaedics, Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20260511

Keywords:

Open fractures, Wound swab, Tissue sample culture, Debridement, Postoperative infection

Abstract

Background: Infection remains a major complication affecting the management and outcome of open fractures. The usefulness of perioperative microbiological cultures in predicting infection has been debated. Commonly used sampling techniques include wound swab (WS) culture and tissue sample (TS) culture. While previous studies have compared swab cultures at different stages of debridement, limited evidence exists comparing WS and TS cultures obtained both before and after debridement in acute open fractures. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of WS and TS cultures in detecting bacterial contamination during the perioperative period of open fracture management.

Methods: This prospective study included 83 patients presenting with open fractures. WS and TS cultures were obtained from all patients during both pre-debridement and post-debridement phases. The microbiological growth patterns from the two techniques were recorded and compared. The association between bacterial growth and factors such as fracture type, time to hospital presentation, and time to surgery was also analyzed. Postoperative infection rates were correlated with culture results.

Results: TS cultures demonstrated significantly higher bacterial detection rates compared to WS cultures. Higher rates of bacterial contamination were observed in Gustilo-Anderson type III B fractures and in patients with delayed presentation to hospital and operating theatre. Post-debridement TS cultures showed higher sensitivity and specificity in predicting postoperative infections when compared with WS cultures.

Conclusions: TS culture is a more reliable method than WS culture for detecting bacterial contamination in open fracture wounds. Post-debridement TS cultures are particularly effective in identifying patients at risk of postoperative infection and may aid in optimizing infection prevention strategies in open fracture management.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Brown CM, Heckman JD. Open fractures. In: Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. 8th ed. Vol 1. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. 2015;353-97.

Wood GW II. Open fractures. In: Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. 12th ed. Vol 1. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. 2013;2561-87.

Badia JM, Casey AL, Petrosillo N, Hudson PM, Mitchell SA, Crosby C. Impact of surgical site infection on healthcare costs and patient outcomes: a systematic review in six European countries. J Hosp Infect. 2017;96(1):1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2017.03.004

Faisham WI, Nordin S, Aidura M. Bacteriological study and its role in the management of open tibial fracture. Med J Malaysia. 2001;56(2):201-6.

Agarwal D, Maheshwari R, Agrawal A, Chauhan V, Juyal A. Pattern of bacterial isolates in open fractures. J Orthop Traumatol Rehabil. 2015;8(1):1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7341.183953

Gupta S, Saini N, Sharma R, Kehal J, Saini Y. Comparative study of efficacy of pre- and post-debridement cultures in open fractures. Internet J Orthop Surg. 2012;19(3):1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5580/2c53

Lingaraj R, Santoshi JA, Devi S, Najimudeen S, Gnanadoss JJ, Kanagasabai R, et al. Pre-debridement wound culture in open fractures does not predict postoperative wound infection: a pilot study. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(1):S63-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.166088

D’Souza A, Rajagopalan N, Amaravati RS. Use of qualitative cultures for detecting infection in open tibial fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2008;16(2):175-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900801600209

Mangala A, Arthi K, Deepa R. Comparison of pre-debridement and post-debridement cultures in predicting postoperative infections in compound fractures. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12(7):DC06-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/36011.11735

Lee J. Efficacy of cultures in the management of open fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;(339):71-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199706000-00010

Cherian JJ, Lobo JO, Ramesh LJ. A comparative study of bacteriological culture results using swab and tissue in open fractures: a pilot study. J Orthop Case Rep. 2019;9(1):33-6.

Valenziano CP, Chattar-Cora D, O'Neill A, Hubli EH, Cudjoe EA. Efficacy of primary wound cultures in long bone open extremity fractures: are they of any value? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122(5):259-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-001-0363-6