Study of functional outcome of minimal invasive spine surgery through tubular microdiscectomy with laminotomy in case of single level prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20260510Keywords:
Lumbar disc herniation, Prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc, Tubular microdiscectomy, Minimally invasive spine surgery, Laminotomy, Functional outcomes, ODI, VAS, Radiculopathy, Neural decompressionAbstract
Background: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most common causes of low back pain and radiculopathy. Traditional open discectomy has been effective but is associated with greater tissue disruption, postoperative pain, and longer recovery. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), particularly tubular microdiscectomy with laminotomy, aims to achieve adequate neural decompression while minimizing approach-related morbidity. Aim was to evaluate the functional outcomes of patients undergoing tubular microdiscectomy with laminotomy for single-level prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc (PLID).
Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Orthopaedics, SMIMER, Surat, from February 2023 to October 2024, involving 25 patients aged 20-70 years with single-level PLID unresponsive to ≥6 months of conservative treatment. All patients underwent tubular microdiscectomy with laminotomy. Clinical assessment included VAS (Visual analogue scale) for pain and ODI (Oswestry disability index) for functional disability. Follow-ups were performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Radiological evaluation confirmed adequate decompression. Compliance rate was 100%.
Results: All patients demonstrated significant postoperative improvement. VAS scores showed progressive reduction in back and leg pain across all follow-up intervals. ODI scores improved markedly, indicating enhanced functional capacity and return to activities of daily living. No major complications, infections, or neurological deterioration were noted. Recovery was rapid, with most patients regaining independent ambulation within days. Cosmetic results and patient satisfaction were high, consistent with the benefits of minimally invasive techniques.
Conclusions: Tubular microdiscectomy with laminotomy is an effective and safe minimally invasive procedure for managing single-level PLID. It offers excellent pain relief, improved functional outcomes, shorter hospital stay, and minimal postoperative morbidity. This technique serves as a reliable alternative to conventional open surgery, particularly in appropriately selected patients.
Metrics
References
Yu P, Mao F, Chen J, Ma X, Dai Y, Liu G, et al. Characteristics and mechanisms of resorption in lumbar disc herniation. Arthrit Res Therapy. 2022;24(1):205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02894-8
Goldberg JL, Hussain I, Sommer F, Härtl R, Elowitz E. The Future of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery. World Neurosurg. 2022;163:233-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.121
Zhang T, Guo N, Wang K, Gang G, Yanhong L, Feng G, et al. Comparison of outcomes between tubular microdiscectomy and conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):479.
Asati S, Jain S, Kundnani VG. Tubular Discectomy Versus Conventional Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation. JMISST. 2020;5(2):51-6.
Keerhan RNU, Bhat SN, Ampar N, Kundangar RS. Microdiscectomy and Minimally Invasive Discectomy Using a Tubular Retractor System for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Comparative Study. Gazi Med J. 2023;35(1):30-7.
Arts M, Brand R, van der Kallen B, Lycklama à Nijeholt G, Peul W. Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? Eur Spine J. 2010;20(1):51-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1482-y
Evaniew N, Bogle A, Soroceanu A, Jacobs WB, Cho R, Fisher CG, et al. Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network. Minimally Invasive Tubular Lumbar Discectomy Versus Conventional Open Lumbar Discectomy: An Observational Study. Global Spine J. 2023;13(5):1293-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682211029863
Patel T, Farhan M, Hamza DN, Daneshpazhouh M, Al Nahar O, El Serafy A, et al. Systematic review of endoscopic vs conventional discectomy: Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive endoscopic discectomy versus conventional surgical techniques for lumbar disc herniation. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025;87(10):6661-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003689
Nepali study: Gupta SK, Faheem M. Open Microdiscectomy or Tubular Discectomy: What Is Better for Lumbar Disc Herniation. Nep J Neurosci. 2023;20(4):27-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/njn.v20i4.58808
Morgenstern JL, Balsano M, Härtl R, Hussain I. Interlaminar microscopic tubular lumbar discectomy (IMTLD) for lumbar disc herniation-central and posterolateral (surgical technique overview). AO Surgery Reference. 2025.
Foley KT, Smith MM. Micro endoscopic discectomy (med): the first 100 cases. Neurosurgery. 1998;43:701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199809000-00303
Clark AJ, Safaee MM, Khan NR, Brown MT, Foley KT. Tubular microdiscectomy: techniques, complication avoidance, and review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;43(2):E7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17202
McGrath LB, White-Dzuro GA, Hofstetter CP. Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive versus open lumbar discectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgical Focus. 2019;46(5):E10.
Khanna R, Sandhu FA, Voyadzis JM. Minimally invasive tubular discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: clinical outcomes and complication rates. J Spine Surg. 2021;7(3):315-22.
Wang MY, Grossman J. Endoscopic minimally invasive lumbar discectomy: a prospective comparative study. Neurosurgery. 2016;79(1):99-106.
Ryu KS, Park CK, Kim MC, Kang JK. Complications of minimally invasive lumbar discectomy using tubular retractors. J Kor Neurosurgical Society. 2019;62(2):208-14.
Hammad A, Wirries A, Ardeshiri A, Nikiforov O, Geiger F. Open versus minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(2):229-36.
Kandeel AY, Elkhateeb HA, Younis EA. Functional outcome of minimally invasive lumbar discectomy in patients with prolapsed lumbar disc. Egypt J Neurosurg. 2021;36:12.
Sonawane DV, Kale AA, Pawar AY. Minimally invasive versus open lumbar discectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Spine J. 2024;18(1):45-56.
Fan S, Hu Z, Zhao F, Zhao X, Huang Y, Fang X. Multifidus muscle changes and spinal stability after minimally invasive lumbar surgery. European Spine J. 2016;25(11):3764-72.
DiRienzo A, Iacoangeli M, Alvaro L, Nocchi N, Scerrati M. Biomechanical preservation following tubular laminotomy for lumbar disc herniation. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:e102-8.
Patil A, Chugh A, Gotecha S, Kotecha M, Punia P, Ashok A, et al. Microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniations. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2018;9(3):156-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_61_18
For standard microdiscectomy technique (as contrast), general steps include level localization using fluoroscopy, ~2-cm skin incision, corridor to lamina via subperiosteal dissection or serial dilation, laminotomy, flavum removal, mobilization of nerve root, and removal of disc fragments.
Menezes DJ et al. Microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniations-a large series of 300 patients operated with tubular retraction / endoscopic tubular system.
Kamper SJ, Ostelo RWJG, Rubinstein SM, Nellensteijn JM, Peul WC, Arts MP, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(5):1021-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3161-2
Liu S, Zhou J. Comparative efficacy and safety of three surgical procedures for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a Bayesian-based network analysis. BMC Surg. 2025;25(1):125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02856-2
Li Z, Wang L, Jiang M. Comparison of outcomes between tubular microdiscectomy and conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18:479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03962-8
Asati S, Jain S, Kundnani VG. Tubular Discectomy Versus Conventional Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation. JMISST. 2020;5(2):51-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2020.00129
Arts MP, Brand R, van den Akker ME. Tubular Diskectomy vs Conventional Microdiskectomy for Sciatica: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2009;302(2):149-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.972
Sonawane DV, Chobing H, Kolur SS, Chandanwale A, Jawale SA, Ansari N, et al. Conventional versus tubular microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A prospective randomized study. Indian Spine J. 2024;7(1):59-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/isj.isj_30_23
Keerhan RNU, Bhat SN, Ampar N, Kundangar RS. Microdiscectomy and Minimally Invasive Discectomy Using a Tubular Retractor System for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Comparative Study. Gazi Med J. 2023;35(1):30-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12996/gmj.galenos.2023.3699
Hathi K, Bigney E, Richardson E, Alugo T, El-Mughayyar D, Vandewint A, et al. Minimally Invasive vs. Open Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Patients with Diabetes-A Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network Study. Global Spine J. 2023;13(6):1602-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682211042576
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
