Cosmetic satisfaction in operative versus non-operative treatment of clavicle fractures: a meta-analysis

Bawan Hama; Prathik Shiruru; Arjun Naik; Manjunath Koti

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20260513

Authors

Bawan Hama Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Princess Royal University Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Prathik Shiruru Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Princess Royal University Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Arjun Naik Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Princess Royal University Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Manjunath Koti Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Princess Royal University Hospital, London, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20260513

Keywords:

Clavicle fracture, Midshaft, Plate fixation, Intramedullary nailing, Conservative treatment, Cosmetic outcome, Scar, Deformity, Patient satisfaction

Abstract

Midshaft clavicle fractures are increasingly treated operatively. Functional and union outcomes have been extensively studied, but patient satisfaction with cosmetic appearance is less frequently analysed. A systematic review of PubMed-indexed comparative studies of operative versus non-operative management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures was performed, with specific focus on patient-reported cosmetic outcomes. Randomised or comparative cohort studies in adults were eligible. The primary endpoint was satisfaction with shoulder appearance. Where dichotomous data were available, risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Where cosmetic data were incomplete, results were synthesised narratively. Four adult studies (three randomised trials and one prospective cohort; 409 fractures in total) reported cosmetic outcome data. Only the multicentre root canal therapy (RCT) from the Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (COTS) provided extractable binary data for global cosmetic satisfaction. At one year, 84% (52/62) of patients treated with plate fixation were satisfied with appearance compared with 53% (26/49) in the non-operative group (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.19-2.10), indicating a 58% relative increase in cosmetic satisfaction with surgery. The RCTs by Robinson et al and Smekal et al both reported significantly higher cosmetic satisfaction in surgically treated patients. The cohort series by Jubel et al described excellent contour restoration and high cosmetic satisfaction after intramedullary fixation. Within the data limitations, operative fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults is associated with higher cosmetic satisfaction than non-operative treatment. Surgery markedly reduces dissatisfaction from bony deformity at the expense of a surgical scar and occasional hardware prominence.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):452-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.126613

Wiesel BB, Nagda S, Mehta S, Churchill RW. Management of midshaft clavicle fractures in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(22):e468-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00442

Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult: epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(3):476-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.80B3.0800476

Song HS, Kim H. Current concepts in the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in adults. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021;24(3):189-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2021.00388

Neer CS II. Nonunion of the clavicle. JAMA. 1960;172(10):1006-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1960.03020100014003

Rowe CR. An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. 1968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-196805000-00006

Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Non-operative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(1):1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00020

Robinson CM, Goudie EB, Murray IR, Jenkins PJ, Ahktar MA, Read EO, et al. Open reduction and plate fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(17):1576-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00307

McKee MD, Wild LM, Schemitsch EH. Midshaft malunions of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(5):790-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200305000-00003

Waldmann S, Benninger E, Meier C. Nonoperative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in adults. Open Orthop J. 2018;12:1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001812010001

Virtanen KJ, Malmivaara AOV, Remes VM, Paavola MP. Operative and nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(1):65-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.652884

Andrade-Silva FB, Kojima KE, Joeris A, Santos Silva J, Mattar R Jr. Single, superiorly placed reconstruction plate compared with flexible intramedullary nailing for midshaft clavicular fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(8):620-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00497

Jubel A, Andermahr J, Bergmann H, Prokop A, Rehm KE. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of midclavicular fractures in athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(6):480-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.6.480

Smekal V, Irenberger A, Struve P, Wambacher M, Krappinger D, Kralinger FS. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(2):106-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318190cf88

Ahrens PM, Garlick NI, Barber J, Tims EM; Clavicle Trial Collaborative Group. The Clavicle Trial: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing operative with nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(16):1345-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01112

van der Meijden OA, Gaskill TR, Millett PJ. Treatment of clavicle fractures: current concepts review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(3):423-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.08.053

Lazarides S, Zafiropoulos G. Conservative treatment of fractures at the middle third of the clavicle: the relevance of shortening and clinical outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(2):191-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.08.007

Andersen K, Jensen PO, Lauritzen J. Treatment of clavicular fractures: figure-of-eight bandage versus a simple sling. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58(1):71-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678709146346

Ropars M, Thomazeau H, Huten D. Clavicle fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103:S53-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.007

Hill JM, McGuire MH, Crosby LA. Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(4):537-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.79B4.0790537

McKee RC, Whelan DB, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD. Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(8):675-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01364

Martin JR, Saunders PE, Phillips M, Mitchell SM, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH, et al. Comparative effectiveness of treatment options for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Bone Jt Open. 2021;2(8):646-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.28.BJO-2021-0112.R1

Rivera-Saldívar G, Manrique-Ávila JA. Superior versus anteroinferior plating for mid-shaft clavicle fractures: a randomized clinical trial. Cir Cir. 2024;92(2):141-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRUE.M23000657

Gadegone WM, Lokhande V. Screw intramedullary elastic nail fixation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a clinical outcome in 36 patients. Indian J Orthop. 2018;52(3):322-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_381_16

Massachusetts General Hospital Sports Medicine Physical Therapy. Rehabilitation protocol for clavicle open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Boston (MA): Massachusetts General Hospital. 2023. Available at: https://www.massgeneral.org/ assets/mgh/pdf/orthopaedics/sports-medicine/physic al-therapy/rehabilitation-protocol-for-clavicle-orif.pdf. Accessed on 08 November 2025.

Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust. Clavicle fracture open reduction internal fixation (ORIF): advice and exercises. Reading (UK): Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust. 2023. Available at: https://www.royalberkshire.nhs.uk/media/scipacg2/clavicle-fracture-open-reduction-internal-fixation-advice-and-exercises_jun23.pdf. Accessed on 08 November 2025.

Tutuhatunewa ED, Stevens M, Dams OC, van Son J, Louhanepessy RD, Krabbe PFM, et al. Exploring patient satisfaction after operative and nonoperative treatment for midshaft clavicle fractures: a focus group analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03557-y

Riiser MO, Molund M. Long-term functional outcomes and complications in operative versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents: a retrospective comparative study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2021;41(5):279-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001768