Non prosthetic peri-implant femur fracture classification system and treatment algorithm: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20261222Keywords:
Peri-implant fracture, Periimplant fracture, Femur fracture, Classification, Management, Surgical fixation, Osteosynthesis, Plate fixation, Intramedullary fixationAbstract
Non-prosthetic peri-implant femoral fractures (NP-PIFFs) are an increasingly recognised complication of fracture fixation, particularly in elderly and osteoporotic patients. These fractures occur in femora containing retained fixation hardware and present unique biomechanical and surgical challenges. Despite their growing prevalence, current literature lacks consensus on classification systems and optimal management. This systematic review aimed to summarise existing classification systems, treatment strategies, and reported outcomes in NP-PIFFs. This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251102564). Searches of Medline and Google Scholar were performed using the keywords peri-implant fracture, femur, classification, and treatment algorithm. Studies were included if they reported on NP-PIFF classification, management, and at least one outcome measure (union rate, one-year mortality, or complications). Study quality was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) tool, and data were synthesised narratively due to heterogeneity. Nineteen studies published between 2016 and 2025 met inclusion criteria, encompassing 984 patients (mean age 82 years). Seven distinct classification systems were identified, with Videla-Cés et al and Chan (NPPIF) being most commonly used. Reported treatment strategies consistently emphasised constructs spanning the entire femur, minimisation of stress risers, and preservation of stable implants to reduce operative trauma. Union rates were high (95-100%), but one-year mortality ranged from 2.7% to 36%, largely reflecting patient frailty. Complications included mechanical failure, loss of fixation, varus collapse, and medical issues such as pneumonia, delirium, and thromboembolic events. NP-PIFFs are complex injuries that remain inconsistently classified and managed across studies. Although union rates are favourable when biological fixation principles are respected, patient outcomes are significantly influenced by age, comorbidity, and systemic complications. Future research should focus on standardising classification systems, validating treatment algorithms, and developing multidisciplinary strategies to optimise both surgical and medical care.
References
Jennison T, Brinsden M: Fracture admission trends in England over a ten-year period. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019;101(3):208-14.
Aguado HJ, PIPPAS Study Group, Aguado HJ, Castillón-Bernal P, Teixidor-Serra J, García-Sánchez Y, et al. Risk factors for one-year mortality in 440 femoral peri-implant fractures: insights from the PIPPAS prospective, multicentre, observational study. Bone Jt Open. 2025;6(1):43-52.
Murphy MP, Kunz KM, Mark P, Jacob T, Madeline T, Bailey J, et al. A Multicenter Study of Intertrochanteric and Pertrochanteric Fragility Fractures: Spanning Fixation Mitigates the Risk of Peri-Implant Fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025;107(15):1709-16.
Müller F, Galler M, Zellner M, Bäuml C, Marzouk A, Füchtmeier B. Peri-implant femoral fractures: The risk is more than three times higher within PFN compared with DHS. Injury. 2016;47(10):2189-94.
Halonen LM, Stenroos A, Vasara H, Jussi K. Peri-implant fracture: a rare complication after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric femoral fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142(12):3715-20.
Castillón P, Muñoz Vives JM, Aguado HJ, Arantxa CA, Ortega-Briones A, Jorge HN. Consensus review on peri-implant femur fracture treatment: Peri-Implant Spanish Consensus (PISCO) investigators’ recommendations. EFORT Open Rev. 2024;9(1):40-50.
Poroh M, Puha B, Gheorghevici TS, Constantin J, Norin F, Paul S, et al. A Retrospective analysis of peri-implant fractures: insights from a large volume clinical Study. Int Orthop. 2023;47(11):2859-68.
Aguado-Maestro I, Valle-López S, Simón-Pérez C, Emilio-Javier FR, García-Cepeda I, de Blas-Sanz I, et al.: Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Peri-Implant Fractures Associated with Short Proximal Femur Nails: Prevention Strategies and Key Insights. J Clin Med. 2025;14(1):261.
Bidolegui F, Pereira S, Munera MA, Germán G, Cesar AP, Robinson EP, et al. Peri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes, and proposal of a treatment algorithm. Chin J Traumatol. 2023;26(4):211-6.
Chan LWM, Gardner AW, Wong MK, Kenon C, Ernest BKK, Singapore Orthopaedic Research CollaborativE (SORCE). Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures: classification, management and outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;138(6):791-802.
Chuang YC, Chiu YC, Wu CH, Kun-Ling T, I-Ming J, Yuan-Kun T, et al. A comparison between nail-plate constructs and the plate-on-plate technique in the treatment of proximal femoral peri-implant fracture. Injury. 2024;55(12):111972.
Egol KA, Carlock KD, Kelly EA, Abhijit S, Brian HM, Andrew JM, et al. Previous Implant Fractures: A New Descriptive Classification System. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(9):423-7.
Kruse M, Mohammed J, Sayed-Noor A, Olof W, Gunnar H, Robin N, et al. Peri-implant femoral fractures in hip fracture patients treated with osteosynthesis: a retrospective cohort study of 1965 patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(1):293-8.
Prevot LB, Bolcato V, Fozzato S, Riccardo A, Michela B, Livio PT, et al. Peri-implant femoral fractures in elderly: Morbidity, mortality, treatment options and good practices. Chin J Traumatol. 2024;28(6):497-502.
Perskin CR, Seetharam A, Mullis BH, Andrew JM, John G, Alexander JM, et al. Peri-implant fractures of the upper and lower extremities: a case series of 61 fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022;32(3):467-74.
Skála-Rosenbaum J, Džupa V, Bartoška R, Pavel D, Petr W, Martin K. Distal locking in short hip nails: Cause or prevention of peri-implant fractures? Injury. 2016;47(4):887-92.
Jegathesan T, Ernest-Kwek. Peri-Implant Fractures Distal to an Antegrade Femoral Nail: A Case Series. Malays Orthop J. 2016;10(1):57-60.
Videla-Cés M, Romero-Pijoan E, Sales-Pérez JM, Sánchez-Navés R, Pallarés N, Videla S, et al. A pilot agreement study of a new classification system for Peri-implant femoral fractures. Injury. 2021;52(7):1908-17.
Videla-Cés M, Sales-Pérez JM, Sánchez-Navés R, Romero-Pijoan E, Videla S, 'Peri-implant Femoral Fractures Study Group. Proposal for the classification of peri-implant femoral fractures: Retrospective cohort study. Injury. 2019;50(3):758-63.
Wulbrand C, Müller F, Füchtmeier B, Alexander H. Therapy aspects of peri-implant femoral fractures-a retrospective analysis of 64 patients. Eur J Trauma Emergency Surg. 2024;50(4):1671-9.
Kim JW, Oh CW, Park KH, Jong-Keon O, Yong-Cheol Y, June-Kyu K. Peri-implant atypical femoral fracture after nail or plate osteosynthesis. J Orthop Sci. 2022;27(4):866-75.
Hollensteiner M, Sandriesser S, Bliven E, Christian von R, Peter A. Biomechanics of Osteoporotic Fracture Fixation. Curr Osteoporosis Rep. 2019;17(6):363-74.
Saggi SS, Chou SM, Wong HPN, Merng KW, Hamid RBAR. Effect of distal interlocking of a cephalomedullary femoral nail on peri-implant fractures: A sawbone biomechanical analysis. Injury. 2022;53(12):3894-8.
Ebrahimi H, Rabinovich M, Vuleta V, Daniel Z, Suraj S, Anton D, et al. Biomechanical properties of an intact, injured, repaired, and healed femur: An experimental and computational study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012;16:121-35.
Robinson CM, Adams CI, Craig M, Doward W, Clarke MCC, Auld J. Implant-Related Fractures of the Femur Following Hip Fracture Surgery. J Bone Jt Surg. 2002;84(7):1116-22.