Pirogoff amputation for foot osteomyelitis: a case report and review of literature

Authors

  • Sudhir Gajanan Late Department of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra State, India
  • Pravin Pandurang Padalkar Department of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra State, India
  • Abhishek Vinayak Patil NMMC Hospital, Vashi, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra State, India
  • Sudhir Gangaram Gadge NMMC Hospital, Vashi, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra State, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20261231

Keywords:

Lower limb amputations, Pirogoff amputation, Foot osteomyelitis

Abstract

Deciding the level of amputation is influenced by healing potential of the stump and preservation of the limb length to optimise the mobility and energy requirement for walking. In 1854, the Russian surgeon Nikolay Ivanovich Pirogoff introduced a technique of foot amputation in which the heel is preserved and used as a base. The forefoot, midfoot, talus, distal part of the calcaneus, and distal tibial articular cartilage are removed. The plantar skin flap is left attached to the calcaneus, which is rotated 90 dorsally to create a sensate weight-bearing surface with minimal loss of leg length. Since the intact heel pad creates the plantar aspect of the stump, the patient is able to bear full weight on the limb, after bone-healing has occurred, with or without a prosthesis. We present a case of a patient who underwent an amputation with the Pirogoff technique following a traumatic compound Lisfranc’s injury and subsequent its progression to osteomyelitis of forefoot and midfoot. Eight months after the procedure, the patient was able to bear weight on the left lower extremity and was fitted with a definitive prosthesis with a long silicon liner. She was able to walk without pain or the aid of crutches. The rating according to the 100-point Taniguchi scale was 75 points, which indicated a very good result. This case adds to the body of evidence supporting the Pirogoff amputation as a valuable reconstructive option in challenging post traumatic severe forefoot injuries with osteomyelitis. The patient was informed and duly consented for publication of the data.

References

Pirogoff NI. Resection of bones and joints and amputations and disarticulations of joints. Clin Orthop Related Res. 1991(266):3-11.

Fried BM. Pirogoff in the Crimean campaign; 1854-55. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1955;31(7):519-36.

Malakhova O. Nikolay Ivanovich Pirogoff (1810-1881). Clin Anat. 2004;17(5):369-72.

Nather A, Wong KL, Lim AS, Zhaowen Ng D, Hey HW. The modified Pirogoff's amputation in treating diabetic foot infections: surgical technique and case series. Diabetes Foot Ankle. 2014;5.

Akira T, Yasuhito T, Kunihiko K, Yuji I, Yoshinori T. Pirogoff Ankle Disarticulation as an Option for Ankle Disarticulation. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2003;(414):322-8.

Langeveld ARJ, Meuffels DE, Oostenbroek RJ, Hoedt MTC. The Pirogoff amputation for necrosis of the forefoot: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Series A. 2011;93(1):21-9.

Langeveld ARJ, Oostenbroek RJ, Wijffels M, Hoedt MTC. The pirogoff amputation for necrosis of the forefoot a case report. J Bone Joint Surgery-Am. 2010;92A(4):968-72.

den Bakker FM, Holtslag HR, van den Brand JGH. Pirogoff Amputation for Foot Trauma: An Unusual Amputation Level: A Case Report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2462-5.

Soderberg B. Partial foot amputations. Guidelines to prosthetic and surgical techniques. 2nd ed. Helsingborg, Sweden: Centre for Partial Foot Amputees. 2001.

Evans KK, Attinger CE, Al-Attar A, Salgado C, Chu CK, Mardini S, et al. The importance of limb preservation in the diabetic population. J Diabetes Complications 2011;25:227-31.

Pinzur MS, Gold J, Schwartz D, Gross N. Energy demands for walking in dysvascular amputees as related to the level of amputation. Orthopedics. 1992;15:1033-6.

Waters RL, Perry J, Antonelli D, Hislop H: Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:42-6.

Rijken AM, Raaymakers EL. The modified Pirogoff amputation for traumatic partial foot amputations. Eur J Surg. 1995;161:237-40.

Nather A, Wong KL, Lim AS, Zhaowen Ng D, Hey HW. The modified Pirogoff's amputation in treating diabetic foot infections: surgical technique and case series. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2014;3:5.

Pinzur MS. Restoration of walking ability with Syme's ankle disarticulation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(361)71-5.

Braaksma R, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB. Syme amputation: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(3):284-91.

Finkler ES, Marchwiany DA, Schiff AP, Pinzur MS. Long-term outcomes following Syme's amputation. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(7):732-5.

Andronic O, Boeni T, Burkhard MD, Kaiser D, Berli MC, Waibel FW. Modifications of the Pirogoff amputation technique in adults: a retrospective analysis of 123 cases. J Orthop. 2020;18:5-12.

Warren G. Conservative amputation of the neuropathic foot-The Pirogoff procedure. Oper Orthop Traumatol 1997;9(1):49-58.

Aziz N, Keng LW. Distal amputations for the diabetic foot. Diabetic Foot Ankle. 2013;4:21288.

Grady JF, Winters CL. The Boyd amputation as a treatment for osteomyelitis of the foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2000;90:234-9.

Pinzur MS, Stuck RM, Sage R, Hunt N, Rabinovich Z. Syme ankle disarticulation in patients with diabetes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(9):1667-72.

Tosun B, Buluc L, Gok U, Unal C. Boyd amputation in adults. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(11):1063-8.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-27

How to Cite

Late, S. G., Padalkar, P. P., Patil, A. V., & Gadge, S. G. (2026). Pirogoff amputation for foot osteomyelitis: a case report and review of literature. International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 12(3), 784–789. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20261231

Issue

Section

Case Reports