Comparison of functional outcomes of modular bipolar hemiarthroplasty done in direct lateral versus posterior approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20254225Keywords:
Direct lateral approach, Femoral neck fracture, Functional outcome, Hemiarthroplasty, Harris hip score, Posterior approachAbstract
Background: Fracture neck of femur (FNF) is a common osteoporotic injury in the elderly, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality. Hemiarthroplasty is widely accepted for displaced FNF; however, the optimal surgical approach remains debated. This study compared the functional and radiological outcomes of cemented modular bipolar hemiarthroplasty performed via direct lateral versus posterior approaches.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Kovai Medical Centre and Hospital, Coimbatore, including 100 patients (aged 51–90 years) who underwent cemented modular bipolar hemiarthroplasty for FNF between June 2018 and June 2019, with one-year follow-up. Patients were grouped based on surgical approach: direct lateral (Group L, n=50) and posterior (Group P, n=50). Intraoperative and postoperative parameters, including operative time, blood loss, hospital stay and complications, were recorded. Functional outcome was assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and radiological assessment included stem alignment, loosening, acetabular erosion and heterotopic ossification. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and t-tests, with p<0.05 considered significant.
Results: Baseline demographics and injury characteristics were comparable between groups. Group L had slightly higher mean operative time and blood loss, while hospital stay and time to weight bearing were similar. Functional outcomes favored Group L, with a higher mean HHS (84.04 vs. 80.06) and greater proportion of excellent/good results (90% vs. 68%). Radiological complications were infrequent and comparable across groups.
Conclusions: Cemented modular bipolar hemiarthroplasty is effective in managing FNF in the elderly. The direct lateral approach offers superior functional outcomes, whereas the posterior approach provides shorter operative time but higher dislocation risk. Surgical approach should be individualized.
References
Divya V, Reddy PK. A study of comparitive analysis of the outcome of Hardinge’s and Moore’s approach of hemi arthroplasty of hip. International J Res Orthopaed. 2018;4(1):72.
Lausten GS, Vedel PE, Nielsen PM. Fractures of the femoral neck treated with a bipolar endoprosthesis. Clin Orthopaed Rel Res. 1987;(218):63-7.
Filipov O. Epidemiology and social burden of the femoral neck fractures. J IMAB–Annual Proceed Scient Papers. 2014;2;20(4):516.
Lönnroos E, Kautiainen H, Sund R, Karppi P, Hartikainen S, Kiviranta I, et al. Utilization of inpatient care before and after hip fracture: a population-based study. Osteop Int. 2009;20(6):879.
Chammout G, Kelly-Pettersson P, Hedbeck CJ, Stark A, Mukka S, Sköldenberg O. HOPE-trial: hemiarthroplasty compared with total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in octogenarians: a randomized controlled trial. JBJS Open Access. 2019;4(2):856.
Hongisto MT, Nuotio MS, Luukkaala T, Väistö O, Pihlajamäki HK. Lateral and posterior approaches in hemiarthroplasty. Scandinavian J Surg. 2018;107(3):260-8.
Nilsdotter A, Bremander A. Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris hip score (HHS), hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), Oxford hip score (OHS), Lequesne index of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip (LISOH) and American Academy of orthopedic surgeons (AAOS) hip and knee questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(11):200-7.
Jeyaraman M, Ravinath TM, Ajay SS, Sabarish K, Ravi Weera AV. Lateral Hardinge’s versus Posterior Southern Moore’s Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty- A Prospective Cohort Study. J Clin Exp Orthop. 2019;5(2):67.
Hovelius L, Hussenius Å, Thorling J. Posterior versus lateral approach for hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1977;48(1):47-51.
Parker MJ. Lateral versus posterior approach for insertion of hemiarthroplasties for hip fractures: A randomised trial of 216 patients. Injury. 2015;46(6):1023-7.
Biber R, Brem M, Singler K, Moellers M, Sieber C, Bail HJ. Dorsal versus transgluteal approach for hip hemiarthroplasty: an analysis of early complications in seven hundred and four consecutive cases. Int Orthopaed. 2012;36(11):2219-23.
Senohradski K, Markovic-Denic L, Lesic A, Bumbasirevic V, Bumbasirevic M. Trends in the incidence of hip fractures. Osteo Int. 2013;24(5):1759-63.
D'Arcy JO, Devas MI. Treatment of fractures of the femoral neck by replacement with the Thompson prosthesis. The J Bone Joint Surg. 1976;58(3):279-86.
Mukherjee DL, Puri HC. Early hemiarthroplasty for fresh fractures of the neck of the femur in geriatric patients. Indian J Surg. 1986;48:77-80.
Tol MC, van Beers LW, Willigenburg NW, Gosens T, Heetveld MJ, Willems HC, et al. Posterolateral or direct lateral approach for hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fractures: a systematic review. HIP International. 2021;31(2):154-65.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
