Comparative analysis of the functional outcome of absorbable and non-absorbable suture material used in management of acute Achilles tendon rupture

Manoj Kumar; Anzar T. Malik; Shiran Rafiq; Khalid Muzzafar; Arpan Bijyal

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20253311

Authors

Manoj Kumar Department of Orthopaedics, MMMC and H Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India
Anzar T. Malik Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Doda, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Shiran Rafiq Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Doda, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Khalid Muzzafar Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Doda, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Arpan Bijyal Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Doda, Jammu and Kashmir, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20253311

Keywords:

Tendoachilles, Polydioxanone, Polyester suture, Boyden score

Abstract

Background: Achilles tendon rupture is one of the most common tendon injuries in the adult population. The injury commonly occurs in middle-aged adults. Patients with acute rupture often present with sudden onset of pain at the site of injury and experience difficulty with ankle plantar flexion compared to the normal side. In most cases, patients report a sensation similar to being kicked in the lower leg. Achilles tendon rupture causes significant pain and disability. This study assessed the comparative analysis and functional outcomes of acute Achilles tendon rupture managed by polydioxanone (PDS) (absorbable) suture and polyester (non-absorbable) suture. We prospectively studied acute Achilles tendon rupture in patients over a 1 and ½ year period and reviewed functional outcomes and complications.

Methods: Forty-nine patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture were included, with a minimum follow-up period of six months. We used the Boyden score to assess outcomes and complications between the two groups repaired by and polyester (Ethibond), respectively.

Results: In our study, all 26 patients (100%) in the PDS (absorbable) group had good or excellent results based on the Boyden clinical assessment, whereas only 13 patients in the polyester repair group had good or excellent results.

Conclusions: Patients treated with the non-absorbable polyester (Ethibond) suture material for repair had a higher incidence of infection and foreign body granulomas. Surgical repair with the absorbable suture PDS is superior to polyester, as it results in significantly lower postoperative wound complications and higher patient Boyden scores. However, studies with larger sample sizes are recommended.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Canale ST, Beaty JH, Azar FM. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics 13th Edition. Elsevier Science Health Science; 2016.

Leppilahti J, Puranen J, Orava S. Incidence of Achilles tendon rupture. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67(3):277-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679608994688

Dalton GP, Wapner KL, Hecht PJ. Complications of Achilles and posterior tibial tendon surgeries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(391):133-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200110000-00014

Pajala A, Kangas J, Ohtonen P, Leppilahti J. Rerupture and deep infection following treatment of total Achilles tendon rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(11):2016-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200211000-00017

Esenyel CZ, Demirhan M, Kilicoglu O, Adanir O, Bilgic B, Guzel O, et al. Evaluation of soft tissue reactions to three nonabsorbable suture materials in a rabbit model. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009;43(4):366-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2009.366

Wada A, Kubota H, Akiyama T, Hatanaka H, Miura H, Iwamoto Y. Effect of absorbable polydioxanone flexor tendon repair and restricted active mobilization in a canine model. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26(3):398406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2001.24134

Yildirim Y, Saygi B, Kara H, Cabukora C, Esemenli T. Tendon holding capacities of the suture materials used in repairing Achilles tendon rupture. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2006;40(2):164164.

Carr BJ, Ochoa L, Rankin D, Owens BD. Biologic response to orthopedic sutures: a histologic study in a rabbit model. Orthopedics. 2009;32(11):828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20090922-11

Strauss EJ, Ishak C, Jazrawi L, Sherman O, Rosen J. Operative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: an institutional review of clinical outcomes. Injury. 2007;38(7):832-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.06.005

Soldatis JJ, Goodfellow DB, Wilber JH. End-to-end operative repair of Achilles tendon rupture. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25(1):90-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659702500118

Cetti R, Christensen SE, Ejsted R, Jensen NM, Jorgensen U. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study and review of the literature. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21(6):791-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659302100606

Bradley JP, Tibone JE. Percutaneous and open surgical repairs of Achilles tendon ruptures. A comparative study. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18(2):188-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659001800213

Inglis AE, Scott WN, Sculco TP, Patterson AH. Ruptures of the tendo Achillis. An objective assessment of surgical and non-surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(7):990-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197658070-00015

Bruggeman NB, Turner NS, Dahm DL, Voll AE, Hoskin TL, Jacofsky DJ, et al. Wound complications after open Achilles tendon repair: an analysis of risk factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(427):63-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000144475.05543.e7

Ollivere BJ, Bosman HA, Bearcroft PW, Robinson AH. Foreign body granulomatous reaction associated with polyethelene ‘Fiberwire((R))’ suture material used in Achilles tendon repair. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;20(2):e27-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2014.01.006

Wada A, Kubota H, Taketa M, Miura H, Iwamoto Y. Comparison of the Mechanical Properties of Polyglycolide-Trimethylene Carbonate (Maxon) and Polydioxanone Sutures (PDS2) used for Flexor Tendon Repair and Active Mobilization. J Hand Surg Br. 2002;27(4):3293292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/jhsb.2002.0767

Gebauer M, Beil FT, Beckmann J, SFT, Be AM, Ueblacker P, Ruecker AH. Mechanical evaluation of different techniques for Achilles tendon repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(9):795:79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0325-8

Alexander JW, Solomkin JS, Edwards MJ. Updated recommandations for control of surgical site infections. Ann Surg. 2011;253(6):10821082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821175f8

Kim DY, Kim SB, Heo YM, Lee JB, Lim JW, Oh HT. Surgical Treatment of the Ruptured Achilles tendon: A Comparative Study between Percutaneous and Open Repair. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 2011;15:79-85.

Ahluwalia R, Zourelidis C, Guo S, Dega R. Chronic sinus formation using non absorbable braided suture following open repair of Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;19(2):e7-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2012.11.003

Mohd J, Bhat NA, Lone ZA, Bhat TA, Afzal T, Dev B, et al. Outcome of a Simple Novel Technique to Reduce Soft Tissue Complications in Open Tendoachilles Injury: A Series of 20 Patients. Malays Orthop J. 2023;17(2):49-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2307.008