Endoscopic lumbar decompression: a single-centre 40-case retrospective series

Authors

  • Dev R. Agarwal Department of Orthopedics, FH Medical College and Hospital, Etmadpur, Agra, U.P., India
  • Johney Juneja Department of Orthopedics, FH Medical College and Hospital, Etmadpur, Agra, U.P., India
  • Lalit Pathak Department of Orthopedics, FH Medical College and Hospital, Etmadpur, Agra, U.P., India
  • Shubham Khandelwal Department of Orthopedics, FH Medical College and Hospital, Etmadpur, Agra, U.P., India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20254218

Keywords:

Disc herniation, Endoscopic decompression, Lumbar stenosis, Minimally invasive, ODI, VAS

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic lumbar decompression is a minimally invasive technique with advantages of reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays and early mobilisation compared to conventional open procedures. This study reports outcomes of 40 patients who underwent lumbar endoscopic decompression at a single tertiary care center.

Methods: Retrospective review of 40 consecutive patients with lumbar disc herniation or spinal stenosis who underwent endoscopic decompression. Clinical outcomes were measured using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) pre-operatively and at final follow-up. Operative time, blood loss, hospital stay and complications were recorded.

Results: The mean age was 52 years (range 30–72), with 24 males and 16 females. The most common level was L4–L5 (60%). Mean VAS for leg pain improved from 8.1 to 2.1 (p<0.001) and ODI improved from 62% to 18% (p<0.001). Complications included 2 dural tears and 1 superficial wound infection. No revision surgeries were required. Mean hospital stay was 1.8 days.

Conclusions: Endoscopic lumbar decompression is a safe and effective technique for carefully selected patients, providing excellent pain relief, functional recovery and reduced morbidity.

 

References

Yeung AT. The evolution of percutaneous spinal endoscopy and discectomy: state of the art. Mt Sinai J Med. 2000;67(4):327-32.

Choi G, Lee SH, Lokhande P, Kong BJ, Shim CS, Jung B, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic approach for highly migrated intracanal disc herniations by foraminoplastic technique. Spine. 2008;33(15):508-15.

Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized study. Spine. 2008;33(9):931-9.

Ahn Y, Lee SH, Park WM, Lee HY, Shin SW, Kang HY. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation. Spine. 2004;29(16):326-32.

Kim CH, Chung CK, Park JY. Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microdiscectomy. World Neurosurg. 2017;106:362-71.

Choi G, Prada C, Kim JS. Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Neurospine. 2018;15(1):16–23.

Wang B, Geng C, Zhang W. Unilateral biportal endoscopic versus microscopic unilateral laminotomy. Int Orthop. 2022;46(4):753–63.

Li H, Liu K, Huang Y, Ma L, Guo Y. Perioperative outcomes and complications of endoscopic versus microendoscopic decompression: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):318.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Agarwal, D. R., Juneja, J., Pathak, L., & Khandelwal, S. (2025). Endoscopic lumbar decompression: a single-centre 40-case retrospective series. International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 12(1), 139–141. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20254218

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles