En bloc resection of proximal fibular giant cell tumour in skeletally immature patients with common peroneal nerve neuropraxia: a retrospective case series of 20 patients with one-year follow-up

Authors

  • Mrinmoy Das Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan, India
  • Mukesh Dhakar Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan, India
  • R. P. Meena Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan, India
  • Satish Kumawat Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20260518

Keywords:

Giant cell tumour, Proximal fibula, Skeletally immature, Common peroneal nerve, En bloc resection, Malawer

Abstract

Giant cell tumour (GCT) of bone is rare in skeletally immature patients, and its occurrence in the proximal fibula presents unique challenges due to the risk of common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury and knee instability. This retrospective case series included 20 skeletally immature patients (≤18 years; mean age 16.35 years) with histologically confirmed proximal fibula GCT and preoperative CPN neuropraxia treated between September 2023 and August 2024 using en bloc (Malawer type I) resection with reattachment of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and biceps femoris. At a minimum 12-month follow-up, outcomes assessed included CPN recovery, recurrence, knee stability, MSTS score, complications, and return to school/sports. There were eight males and twelve females (right: left=9:11); 16 (80%) had Campanacci grade II and 4 (20%) grade III lesions, with a median symptom duration of seven months. All underwent resection with negative margins, and the mean operative time was 72 minutes. At 12 months, 17 patients (85%) achieved complete CPN recovery (mean 9 months), and 3 (15%) had partial recovery, with no persistent palsy or recurrence. The mean MSTS score was 28.6±1.87, and 17 knees (85%) were stable while 3 (15%) showed grade I varus laxity. Median return to school and sports were 28 and 32 weeks, respectively. Complications included two superficial infections and one wound debridement, with no permanent deficits. These findings indicate that en bloc resection with nerve preservation and lateral stabiliser reattachment provides excellent oncological control and functional outcomes in skeletally immature patients with proximal fibula GCT and preoperative CPN neuropraxia.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abdel MP, Eckardt JJ, Sim FH. Surgical management of benign tumors of the proximal fibula. Clin OrthopRelat Res. 2010;468(8):2213-9.

Guo C, Zhang X, Gao F, Wang L, Sun T. Surgical management of proximal fibular tumors: risk factors for recurrence and complications. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(5):1884-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060518762677

Zhao S, Yu W, Guo J, Wang M, Ma Q. Lateral stability after proximal fibula resection depends on lateral collateral ligament and biceps femoris reattachment. Exp Ther Med. 2013;6(4):1028-32.

Kim WJ, Kim S, Choi DW, Lim GH, Jung ST. Characteristics of giant cell tumor of the bone in pediatric patients: our 18-year, single-center experience. Children (Basel). 2021;8(12):1157.

Prajapati A, Kishore A, Rai M. Proximal fibulectomy: the doubt of “expendable” fibula persists. Cureus. 2024;16(3):e12345.

Huntley K, Al-Hardan W, Pretell-Mazzini J. Surgical Management of Benign Tumors of the Proximal Fibula. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021;5(9):e21.00207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00207

Bickels J, Malawer MM. Malawer classification: surgical technique and outcomes in proximal fibular tumors. In: Tumor Surgery. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer. 2015;451-64.

Kim WJ, Kim S, Choi DW, Lim GH, Jung ST. Characteristics of Giant Cell Tumor of the Bone in Pediatric Patients: Our 18-Year, Single-Center Experience. Children (Basel). 2021;8(12):1157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121157

Kransdorf MJ, Sweet DE, Buetow PC, Giudici MA, Moser RP Jr. Giant cell tumor in skeletally immature patients. Radiology. 1992;184(1):233-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.184.1.1609086

Tepper SC, Spellman AM, Gusho CA, Blank AT. En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor following Neoadjuvant Denosumab: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022;14(4):35457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.35457

Abdel MP, Eckardt JJ, Sim FH. Surgical management of benign tumors of the proximal fibula. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(8):2213-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1464-8

Hofer R, Valentini M, Smolle MA, Leithner A, Bergovec M. Proximal Fibula Resection for Tumors-Case Series and Technical Note. J Clin Med. 2024;13(23):7138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237138

Sakamoto A, Yamamoto N, Matsuda S. En bloc resection of proximal fibula tumor: case series and review. J Surg Case Rep. 2019;2019(9):rjz252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjz252

Downloads

Published

2026-02-24

How to Cite

Das, M., Dhakar, M., Meena, R. P., & Kumawat, S. (2026). En bloc resection of proximal fibular giant cell tumour in skeletally immature patients with common peroneal nerve neuropraxia: a retrospective case series of 20 patients with one-year follow-up. International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 12(2), 475–478. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20260518