Portal placement in elbow arthroscopy and risk of injury to major nerves and vessels: a cadaveric study

Authors

  • Mathew Joseph Department of Anatomy, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India
  • Tarun Goyal Department of Orthopaedics, AIIMS Bathinda, Punjab, India
  • Prabhat Goel Department of Anatomy, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Urvi Sharma Department of Anatomy, AIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
  • Bharti Devi Department of Anatomy, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  • Mukesh Singla Department of Anatomy, AIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
  • Brijendra Singh Department of Anatomy, AIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20254214

Keywords:

Portal placement, Elbow arthroscopy, Cadaver, Nerve injury

Abstract

Background: Elbow arthroscopy is one of the popularly used surgical procedures in treating various elbow pathologies. Cadaveric data on the safety of arthroscopic portals and data on outcome following an arthroscopic procedure of elbow is lacking. This study aimed to measure the distance of 5 arthroscopic portals from 7 selected neurovascular structures in cadaveric elbow in 3 different elbow positions.

Methods: Observational study was conducted at the All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS) Rishikesh, Uttarakhand India. A total 20 soft embalmed cadaveric elbow were dissected following placement of arthroscopic portals at different elbow positions. Data were compared and analysed using SPSS software with ANOVA test.

Results: Medial cutaneous nerve of forearm (MCNF) was injured (5/1020) which is <0.5% when using superomedial (SM) and anteromedial (AM) portals. Statistically significant change was found while considering Lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm (LCNF) from anterolateral (AL) portal at various angles of the elbow and brachial artery (BA) from AM portal. Rest of all structures did not show any statistical significance on changing angles of elbow flexion.

Conclusions: Minor nerves are at risk in certain portals. Position of AL portal is safer when compared to AM portal. With proper surgical guidelines, elbow arthroscopy is safe and much useful procedure which help the operating surgeon to choose the appropriate portal and also may aid in minimizing trauma to underlying structures during intervention.

References

Miller CD, Jobe CM, Wright MH. Neuroanatomy in elbow arthroscopy. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1995;4(3):168-74.

Boe S. Arthroscopy of the elbow: Diagnosis and extraction of loose bodies. Acta Orthop. 1986;57(1):52-3.

Khanchandani P. Elbow Arthroscopy: Review of the Literature and Case Reports. Case Rep Orthop. 2012;2012:1-5.

McLaughlin RE, Savoie FH, Field LD, Ramsey JR. Arthroscopic treatment of the arthritic elbow due to primary radiocapitellar arthritis. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2006;22(1):63-9.

Matsuura T, Egawa H, Takahashi M, Higashino K, Sakai T, Suzue N, et al. State of the art: Elbow arthroscopy: Review of the literature and application for osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum. J Med Investig. 2014;61(3-4):233-40.

Acosta Batlle J, Cerezal L, López Parra MD, Alba B, Resano S, Blázquez Sánchez J. The elbow: review of anatomy and common collateral ligament complex pathology using MRI. Insights Imaging. 2019;10:1.

Reina N, Abbo O, Gomez-Brouchet A, Chiron P, Moscovici J, Laffosse JM. Anatomy of the bands of the hamstring tendon: How can we improve harvest quality? Knee. 2013;20(2):90-5.

Stothers K, Day B, Regan WR. Arthroscopy of the elbow: Anatomy, portal sites, and a description of the proximal lateral portal. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 1995;11(4):449-57.

Claessen FMAP, Kachooei AR, Kolovich GP, Buijze GA, Oh LS, van den Bekerom MPJ, et al. Portal placement in elbow arthroscopy by novice surgeons: cadaver study. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(7):2247-54.

Chaware P, Santoshi J, Pakhare A, Rathinam B. Risk of nerve injury during arthroscopy portal placement in the elbow joint: A cadaveric study. Indian J Orthop. 2016;50(1):74-9.

Andrews JR, Carson WG. Arthroscopy of the elbow. Arthroscopy. 1985;1(2):97-107.

Elfeddali R, Schreuder MHE, Eygendaal D. Arthroscopic elbow surgery, is it safe? J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22(5):647-52.

Andrews JR, Carson WG. Arthroscopy of the elbow. Arthroscopy. 1985;1(2):97-107.

Unlu MC, Kesmezacar H, Akgun I, Ogut T, Uzun I. Anatomic relationship between elbow arthroscopy portals and neurovascular structures in different elbow and forearm positions. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2006;15(4):457-62.

Thon S, Gold P, Rush L, O’Brien MJ, Savoie FH. Modified Anterolateral Portals in Elbow Arthroscopy: A Cadaveric Study on Safety. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2017;33(11):1981-5.

Jackson RW. The Scope of Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy in Canada. 1986;7;208.

Camp CL, Degen RM, Dines JS, Altchek DW, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Basics of Elbow Arthroscopy Part III: Positioning and Diagnostic Arthroscopy in the Lateral Decubitus Position. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5(6):e1351-5.

Adolfsson L. Arthroscopy of the elbow joint: A cadaveric study of portal placement. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1994;3(2):53-61.

Plancher KD, Peterson RK, Brezenoff L. Diagnostic arthroscopy of the elbow: Set-up, portals, and technique. Oper Tech Sports Med. 1998;6(1):2-10.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Joseph, M., Goyal, T., Goel, P., Sharma, U., Devi, B., Singla, M., & Singh, B. (2025). Portal placement in elbow arthroscopy and risk of injury to major nerves and vessels: a cadaveric study. International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 12(1), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20254214

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles