Outcome of closed tibial diaphyseal fracture managed by intramedullary interlocking nail through suprapatellar approach

Authors

  • M. Kamruzzaman Department of Hand and Microsurgery, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Manash C. Sarker Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sarkari Karmachari Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • M. Zakir Hossain Department of Orthopaedics, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • S. M. Mainul Hassan Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • M. Rajib Mahmud Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • G. M. Alamgir Kabir Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation, Dhaka, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20252626

Keywords:

Tibial fracture, Suprapatellar approach, Intramedullary nailing, Functional outcome, Lysholm knee score

Abstract

Background: Tibial fractures are among the most common long-bone injuries, and their subcutaneous location makes management challenging. Intramedullary fixation is the preferred treatment for diaphyseal tibial fractures, though the optimal approach remains debated. The suprapatellar approach is increasingly favored by surgeons.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at the National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedic Rehabilitation (NITOR), Dhaka, from September 2021 to March. Thirty-three patients with closed diaphyseal tibial fractures meeting the selection criteria were treated with intramedullary interlocking nails using a suprapatellar approach and followed up for 12 months.

Results: The mean age was 38.3±11.6 years, with 70% male patients. The mean duration from injury to surgery was 13.4±3.3 days. Anterior knee pain occurred in only 5 patients (15.2%). The mean VAS score was 0.5±1.1 (range 0–4). Union time averaged 17.9±3.5 weeks; delayed union occurred in 2 cases (6.1%) and nonunion in 1 case (3%). The mean arc of knee motion was 130.3±8.6 degrees. Functional outcome assessed via Lysholm knee score averaged 93.8±8.9. Outcomes were excellent in 72.7%, good in 18.2%, and fair in 9.1% of patients.

Conclusions: Intramedullary nailing using the suprapatellar approach for tibial diaphyseal fractures demonstrates favorable outcomes, including high Lysholm scores, low complication rates, reliable union, improved knee motion, and reduced anterior knee pain.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Packer T, Naqvi A, Edwards T. Intramedullary tibial nailing using infrapatellar and suprapatellar approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2020;52:307-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.047

Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Swinttkowski M, Schemitsch E. Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia: a systematic overview and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:62-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.83B1.0830062

Larsen P, Elsoe R, Hansen S, Graven-Nielsen T, Laessoue U, Rasmussen S. Incidence and epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures. Injury. 2015;46:746-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.027

Grutter R, Cordey J, Buhler M, Johner R, Regazzoni P. The epidemiology of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia. Injury. 2000;31:64-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(00)80035-2

Bode G, Strohm P, Sudkamp N, Hammer T. Tibial shaft fractures—management and treatment options. A review of the current literature. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79:499-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2012/072

Sperone E, Iglesias M, Bigatti A, Torterola I, Atilmis Y, Vadell A. Suprapatellar intramedullary nailing of the tibia. J Foot Ankle. 2020;14:153-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30795/jfootankle.2020.v14.1175

Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Swinttkowski M, Schemitsch E. Reamed versus nonreamed intramedullary nailing of lower extremity long bone fractures: a systematic overview and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:2-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200001000-00002

Ciminero M, Elsevier H, Solarczyk J, Matityahu A. Suprapatellar Tibial Nailing: Future or Fad? J Clin Med. 2023;12:1796-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051796

Githens M, Bishop J. Complex tibial fractures: tips and tricks for intramedullary nail fixation. Clin Med Insights Trauma Intensive Med. 2014;5:12264-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4137/CMTIM.S12264

Sanders R, DiPasquale T, Jordan C, Arrington J, Sagi H. Semiextended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using a suprapatellar approach: radiographic results and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 12 months follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:245-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000082

Xu H, Gu F, Xin J, Tian C, Chen F. A meta-analysis of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures. Heliyon. 2019;5:e02119-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02199

Badami RN, Purohit S. Dynamically locked intramedullary interlocking nail for fracture shaft of tibia: An effective surgical protocol with minimal complications. Indian J Orthop. 2018;4:41-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/2395-1362.2018.0009

Perumal R, Shankr V, Basha R, Jayaramaraju D. Is nail dynamization beneficial after twelve weeks – An analysis of 37 cases. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018;9:322-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.12.007

Acharya BM, Tamrakar R, Devkota P, Thakur AK, Shrestha SK. Outcome of tibial diaphyseal fracture fixation with Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) nail. J Patan Acad Health Sci. 2019;6:5-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/jpahs.v6i2.27206

Serbest S, Tiftikci U, Coban M, Cirpar M, Daglar B. Knee pain and functional scores after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures using a suprapatellar approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33:37-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001337

Zamora R, Wright C, Short A, Seligson D. Comparison between suprapatellar and parapatellar approaches for intramedullary nailing of the tibia: cadaveric study. Injury. 2016;47:2087-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.024

Chan DS, Serrano-Riera R, Griffing R, Steverson B, Infante A, Watson D, et al. Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar tibial nail insertion: a prospective randomized control pilot study. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:130-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000499

Islam MS, Hossain MT, Uddin MN, Chowdhury MR, Hasan MS. Experience in the management of distal third tibia and fibula fractures by interlocking intramedullary nail in Community Based Medical College Hospital. Community Based Med J. 2021;10:91-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/cbmj.v10i2.59173

Gelbke MK, Coombs D, Powell S, DiPasquale TG. Suprapatellar versus infra-patellar intramedullary nail insertion of the tibia: a cadaveric model for comparison of patellofemoral contact pressures and forces. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:665-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f6c001

Downloads

Published

2025-08-25

How to Cite

Kamruzzaman, M., Sarker, M. C., Hossain, M. Z., Hassan, S. M. M., Mahmud, M. R., & Kabir, G. M. A. (2025). Outcome of closed tibial diaphyseal fracture managed by intramedullary interlocking nail through suprapatellar approach . International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 11(5), 1007–1012. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20252626

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles