A comparison of intramedullary nailing versus plating in AO type 15.2B and 15.2C clavicle fractures: a prospective study

Nikhil Jain; Pranshu Sharma; Ayush Jain

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20254211

Authors

Nikhil Jain Department of Orthopedics, MLB Medical College, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Pranshu Sharma Department of Orthopedics, MLB Medical College, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Ayush Jain Department of Orthopedics, MLB Medical College, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20254211

Keywords:

Midshaft clavicle fracture, AO classification 15B and 15C, Titanium elastic nailing system, Plate fixation

Abstract

Background: Midshaft clavicle fractures, particularly AO types 15B and 15C, are common orthopedic injuries. Surgical management is preferred in displaced fractures due to complications associated with conservative treatment. This study compares intramedullary fixation using titanium elastic nailing system (TENS) with conventional plating.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 80 patients aged 15-70 years with AO 15B and 15C clavicle fractures. Patients were randomized into two groups: one treated with TENS and the other with plating. Surgical, radiological, and functional outcomes were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively using Constant-Murley and DASH scores, union time, and complications.

Results: TENS group had significantly shorter union time (7.4 weeks vs. 8.9 weeks, p=10.024), smaller incision size, and shorter hospital stay. Functional scores were superior in the TENS group. TENS group had significantly shorter union time (p=0.024), smaller incision size, and shorter hospital stay. Implant prominence was more common with TENS, but plating had higher rates of infection, non-union, and implant failure.

Conclusions: TENS provides superior functional recovery, better cosmetic results, and fewer complications in AO 15B and 15C clavicle fractures. It is a cost-effective and efficient alternative to plating, especially in resource-limited settings. However, plating may offer more stable fixation in complex fracture patterns.

References

Bentley TP, Hosseinzadeh S. Clavicle Fractures. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2025.

Stegeman SA, de Jong M, Sier CF, Krijnen P, Pieta K, Jan WD, Tom PHT, et al. Displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: non-operative treatment versus plate fixation (Sleutel-TRIAL). A multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:196.

Hill JM, McGuire MH, Crosby LA. Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(4):537-9.

Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Wakefield AE. Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(7):1359-65.

Smekal V, Irenberger A, Struve P, Wambacher M. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures-a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(2):106-12.

Tsai SW, Ma HH, Hsu FW, Chou TA. Risk factors for refracture after plate removal for midshaft clavicle fracture after bone union. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):457.

Andrade-Silva FB, Kojima KE, Joeris A. Single, superiorly placed reconstruction plate compared with flexible intramedullary nailing for midshaft clavicular fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(8):620-6.

Ferran NA, Hodgson P, Vannet N. Locked intramedullary fixation vs plating for displaced and shortened mid-shaft clavicle fractures: a randomized clinical trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(6):783-9.

Nordqvist A, Petersson C. The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin OrthopRelat Res. 1994;(300):127-32.

Saha P, Datta P, Ayan S, Garg AK, Bandyopadhyay U, Kundu S. Plate versus titanium elastic nail in treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: A comparative study. Indian J Orthop. 2014;48(6):587-93.

McKee RC, Whelan DB, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD. Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(8):675-84.

Fuglesang HFS, Flugsrud GB, Randsborg PH, Oord P, Benth JŠ, Utvåg SE. Plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing of completely displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(8):1095-101.

Böstman O, Manninen M, Pihlajamäki H. Complications of plate fixation in fresh displaced midclavicular fractures. J Trauma. 1997;43(5):778-83.

Poi genfürst J, Rappold G, Fischer W. Plating of fresh clavicular fractures: results of 122 operations. Injury. 1992;23(4):237-41.

Liu PC, Chien SH, Chen JC, Hsieh CH, Chou PH, Lu CC. Minimally invasive fixation of displaced midclavicular fractures with titanium elastic nails. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(4):217-23.

Kuner EH, Schlickewei W, Mydla F. Surgical therapy of clavicular fractures, indications, technic, results. Hefte Unfallheilkd. 1982;160:76-83.