Comparison study for internal and external modes of fixation for fractures of distal end radius

Authors

  • Ripple Shah Department of Orthopaedics, GCS medical college and hospital, Ahmedabad, Surat, Gujarat, India
  • Suril Shah Department of Orthopaedics, GCS medical college and hospital, Ahmedabad, Surat, Gujarat, India
  • Aalok Shah Department of Orthopaedics, GCS medical college and hospital, Ahmedabad, Surat, Gujarat, India
  • Sharvil Gajjar Department of Orthopaedics, GCS medical college and hospital, Ahmedabad, Surat, Gujarat, India
  • Vijay Chaudhari Department of Orthopaedics, Govt Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India
  • Pratik Siddhapuria Department of Orthopaedics, Govt Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20172032

Keywords:

Distal radius, Gartland and Werley, Volar plating

Abstract

Background: Fractures of the distal radius continue to be one of the most common skeletal injuries. The methods which are commonly practiced are closed manipulation and plaster cast, pins and plaster, percutaneous pinning, external fixation and open reduction and internal fixation with or without bone graft. Surgeons are increasingly faced with the dilemma of when to consider operative management and when cast immobilization is the optimal treatment.

Methods: 47 cases of distal end radius fractures were operated in the orthopedic department of a tertiary care centre. The purpose of the present study was to compare the results of external and internal fixation methods for the treatment of fractures of distal end of radius. Patients operated by external fixation were classified as Group A and those operated by internal fixation were classified as group B. Patients were classified according to AO Classification. Patients were followed at regular intervals depending on the case and time of operation and evaluated by Gartland and Werley score.

Results: In our study, 29 patients were of extraarticular type, of which 86.20% had an excellent score and 18 patients were of intraarticular type, of which 83.33% had an excellent score. But when compared to groups A and B, the percentage of excellent score obtained in group B was more than that in group A in both extraarticular and intraarticular fractures. Yuan-kun et al did a study on intraarticular distal end radius fractures and evaluated the patients by Gartland and Werley point system, concluding that plating gives better results than external fixation supplemented by K wiring.

Conclusions: We concluded that no method of fixation can be said superior to the other. Each method has fracture-specific indication. The results of open reduction and internal fixation can be better than external fixation in initial months, but in the long run, both the methods can have excellent score, provided the fixation is good and properly indicated.

References

Golden GN. Treatment and programs of Colles’ fracture. Lancet. 1963;1:511-4.

Axelrod, Paley, Green. Limited open reduction of the lunate facet in comminuted intraarticular fractures of the distal radius. J Hand Surg. 1988;13:384-9.

Court-Brown C, Flynn JM, Heckman JD, McQueen MM, Skaggs DL, Tornetta P, et al. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. 2014;2:910

Leung F, Tu YK, Chew WY, Chow SP. Comparison of external and percutaneous pin fixation with plate fixation for intraarticular distal radius fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(1):16-22.

Gartland J, Werley C. Evaluation of healed Colles’ fracture. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1951;33: 895-907.

Kreder HJ, Hanel DP, Agel J, McKee M, Schemitsch EH, Trumble TE, et al. Indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: a randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(6):829-36.

Wei DH, Raizman NM, Bottino CJ, Jobin CM, Strauch RJ, Rosenwasser MP. Unstable distal radial fractures treated with external fixation, a radial column plate, or a volar plate. J Bone J Surg. 2009;91:1568-77.

Koval K, Haidukewych GJ, Service B, Zirgibel BJ. Controversies in the management of distal radius fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(9):566-75.

Grewal R, Perey B, Wilmink M, Stothers K. A randomized prospective study on the treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures: open reduction and internal fixation with dorsal plating versus mini open reduction, percutaneous fixation, and external fixation. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(4):764-72.

Kreder HJ, Hanel DP, Agel J, McKee M, Schemitsch EH, Trumble TE, et al. Indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: a randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(6):829-36.

Kapoor H, Agarwal A, Dhaon BK. Displaced intra-articular fractures of distal radius: a comparative evaluation of results following closed reduction, external fixation and open reduction with internal fixation. Injury. 2000;31(2):75-9.

Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602-8.

Rozental TD, Blazar PE, Franko OI, Chacko AT, Earp BE, Day CS. Functional outcomes for unstable distal radial fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation or closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):1837-46.

Egol KA, Walsh M, Romo-Cardoso S, Dorsky S, Paksima N. Distal radial fractures in the elderly: operative compared with nonoperative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(9):1851-7.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles