Surgical drains following arthroplasty: a systematic review and summary of evidence based on available systematic reviews

Rupin S. Singapanga; Rayeez Ahmed; Ajay N. Samuel

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251761

Authors

Rupin S. Singapanga Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9588-8616
Rayeez Ahmed Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Ajay N. Samuel Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8614-1057

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251761

Keywords:

Surgical drain, Closed suction drain, Arthroplasty, Systematic review, Review of reviews

Abstract

The use of surgical drains following arthroplasty is an age-old practice, but has declined in popularity in recent times. Various aspects pertaining to their safety and efficacy have been studied in the past, in focused studies and systematic reviews. The present research aimed to review and summarize the high-quality evidence on the subject. A described methodological framework for conducting a “systematic review of systematic reviews” was chosen, and reporting was performed in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Following a search in the PubMed/Medline and PubMed Central indexing databases, a total of 34 systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses were included. Our research unequivocally indicates that routine drain application is not associated with a reduction in the incidence of postoperative hematoma formation or limb swelling, though it unambiguously results in a significant reduction in the incidence of surgical site erythema and ecchymoses, and the need to change wound dressings postoperatively. This benefit, however, comes at the expense of the possibility of increased blood loss, transfusion requirement, and time to functional recovery, as well as the deterrence to a full implementation of the principles of “enhanced recovery after surgery” protocols and day-care surgery. Where drains are deemed inevitable, the practice of intermittent clamping can mitigate the magnitude of blood loss, while autologous re-transfusion drains may reduce blood transfusion requirements.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Parker MJ, Livingstone V, Clifton R, McKee A. Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2007(3):CD001825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001825.pub2

Savage JW, Anderson PA. An update on modifiable factors to reduce the risk of surgical site infections. Spine J. 2013;13(9):1017-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.051

Durai R, Ng PC. Surgical vacuum drains: types, uses, and complications. AORN J. 2010;91(2):266-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2009.09.024

Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-15

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Chen ZY, Gao Y, Chen W, Li X, Zhang YZ. Is wound drainage necessary in hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24(6):939-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1284-0

Quinn M, Bowe A, Galvin R, Dawson P, O'Byrne J. The use of postoperative suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2015;39(4):653-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2455-2

Zhu Y, Zhang F, Chen W, Liu S, Zhang Q, Zhang Y. Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect. 2015;89(2):82-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2014.10.008

Kong L, Cao J, Zhang Y, Ding W, Shen Y. Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2017;14(3):529-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12640

Zhang Q, Liu L, Sun W, Gao F, Zhang Q, Cheng L, et al. Are closed suction drains necessary for primary total knee arthroplasty?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(30):e11290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011290

Matar HE, Platt SR, Gollish JD, Cameron HU. Overview of randomized controlled trials in total knee arthroplasty (47,675 patients): What have we learnt? J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(6):1729-36.e1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.065

Matar HE, Platt SR, Board TN, Porter ML. Overview of randomized controlled trials in primary total hip arthroplasty (34,020 patients): What have we learnt? J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020;4(8):e20.00120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00120

Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Betsch M, Eschweiler J, Tingart M, Baroncini A. Closed suction drainages in lower limb joint arthroplasty: a level i evidence based meta-analysis. Surgeon. 2022;20(3):e51-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2021.02.014

Hameed D, Dubin JA, Bains SS, Board T, Nunley R, Mont MA. Effect of various ancillary operating room techniques on wound healing outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int. 2022;43:289-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52198/23.STI.43.OS1749

Lachance A, Shahsavarani S, Sogard O, McDonald J, Stilwell M, Lutton J. Suction drain usage has no benefit following revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024;144(8):3565-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05474-4

Kelly EG, Cashman JP, Imran FH, Conroy R, O'Byrne J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of closed suction drainage versus non-drainage in primary hip arthroplasty. Surg Technol Int. 2014;24:295-301.

Parker MJ, Roberts CP, Hay D. Closed suction drainage for hip and knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(6):1146-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200406000-00005

Compagnoni R, Puglia F, Magnani M, Klumpp R, Ferrua P, Calanna F, et al. Optimised fast-track protocols in total knee arthroplasty determine shorter hospitalisation time and lower perioperative/postoperative complications. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024;32(4):963-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12122

Si HB, Yang TM, Zeng Y, Shen B. No clear benefit or drawback to the use of closed drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1039-2

Li N, Liu M, Wang D, He M, Xia L. Comparison of complications in one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty with and without drainage. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0140-1

Zhou XD, Li J, Xiong Y, Jiang LF, Li WJ, Wu LD. Do we really need closed-suction drainage in total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2013;37(11):2109-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2053-8

Zhang QD, Guo WS, Zhang Q, Liu ZH, Cheng LM, Li ZR. Comparison between closed suction drainage and nondrainage in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(8):1265-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.005

Basilico M, Vitiello R, Liuzza F, Minutillo F, Ruberto P, Matrangolo MR, et al. Efficacy of postoperative drainage in total knee arthroplasty: Review of the literature. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2020;12(Suppl 1):8663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2020.8663

Soranoglou V, Poultsides LA, Triantafyllopoulos GK, De Martino I, Memtsoudis SG, Sculco TP. Optimizing intraoperative blood management for one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty. HSS J. 2018;14(2):202-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9590-4

Kosins AM, Scholz T, Cetinkaya M, Evans GRD. Evidence-based value of subcutaneous surgical wound drainage: the largest systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(2):443-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182958945

Tai TW, Yang CY, Jou IM, Lai KA, Chen CH. Temporary drainage clamping after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(8):1240-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.08.013

Li T, Zhuang Q, Weng X, Zhou L, Bian Y. Non-continuous versus continuous wound drainage after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2014;38(2):361-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2105-0

Huang Z, Ma J, Pei F, Yang J, Zhou Z, Kang P, et al. Meta-analysis of temporary versus no clamping in TKA. Orthopedics. 2013;36(7):543-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20130624-11

Markar SR, Jones GG, Karthikesalingam A, Segaren N, Patel RV. Transfusion drains versus suction drains in total knee replacement: meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(9):1766-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1761-0

Haien Z, Yong J, Baoan M, Mingjun G, Qingyu F. Post-operative auto-transfusion in total hip or knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055073

Xie H, Pan JK, Hong KH, Guo D, Fang J, Yang WY, et al. Postoperative autotransfusion drain after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27461

Hong KH, Pan JK, Yang WY, Luo MH, Xu SC, Liu J. Comparison between autologous blood transfusion drainage and closed-suction drainage/no drainage in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0993-z

Hong KH, Pan JK, Xie H, Guo D, Yang WY, Su HT, et al. Review: Autologous blood transfusion drainage compared with no drainage in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2017;30(6):2321-7.

Pan JK, Hong KH, Xie H, Luo MH, Guo D, Liu J. The efficacy and safety of autologous blood transfusion drainage in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1301-7

Li N, Li P, Liu M, Wang D, Xia L. Comparison between autologous blood transfusion drainage and no drainage/closed-suction drainage in primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(11):1623-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2090-9

Ji W, Lin X, Zhang R, Tang P, Mo J, Teng X, et al. Application of postoperative autotransfusion in total joint arthroplasty reduces allogeneic blood requirements: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1710-2

Mayer M, Naylor J, Harris I, Badge H, Adie S, Mills K, et al. Evidence base and practice variation in acute care processes for knee and hip arthroplasty surgeries. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0180090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180090

Long H, Li Z, Xing D, Ke Y, Lin J. The usage of drainage after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty: best evidence selection and risk of bias considerations. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):1028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04897-z

Lazic S, Boughton O, Kellett CF, Kader DF, Villet L, Rivière C. Day-case surgery for total hip and knee replacement: How safe and effective is it? EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3(4):130-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.3.170031

Changjun C, Jingkun L, Yun Y, Yingguang W, Yanjun R, Debo Z, et al. Enhanced recovery after total joint arthroplasty (TJA): a contemporary systematic review of clinical outcomes and usage of key elements. Orthop Surg. 2023;15(5):1228-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13710