Optimization of surgical fixation in cervical spine fractures using advanced imaging techniques: a systematic review of functional and neurological outcomes

Authors

  • Jesús Jiménez-Sánchez Department of Neurosurgery, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico
  • Diego Alberto García Cortés Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, IMSS Victorio de la Fuente Narvaez, Mexico
  • Ninoska Andrea Fuentes Sánchez Department of Medicine, Universidad Andrés Bello, Chile, South America
  • Juan Pablo Lasso Bravo Department of Medicine, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Ecuador, South America
  • Juan Carlos Arce Vivas Department of Medicine, Universidad ICESI, Colombia, South America
  • Norman Baldelmir Olmedo Raza Faculty of Medical Sciences, Central University of Ecuador, Ecuador, South America
  • Ayrthon Ezequiel Olmedo Salvador Department of Imagenology, OPTIMAGEN, Ecuador, South America
  • Sebastián Barragán Barreto Department of Medicine, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Colombia, South America

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251747

Keywords:

Advanced imaging, CT, Cervical spine fractures, MRI, Neurological outcomes, Surgical fixation

Abstract

Cervical spine fractures are high-stakes injuries with substantial risks of permanent neurological damage and disability. Traditional imaging methods, including plain radiographs and fluoroscopy, are limited by low sensitivity and spatial resolution. This systematic review assesses the impact of advanced imaging specifically preoperative MRI, CT and intraoperative navigation systems on surgical fixation accuracy and patient outcomes. In methodology, we followed PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from 2010 to 2024. Eligible studies included adult patients with cervical spine trauma undergoing surgical fixation with reported outcomes in screw accuracy, neurological recovery (ASIA scores) or functional status (JOA, NDI, SF-36). Data were synthesized and quality assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. In results, eleven studies (n=1,220 patients) met inclusion criteria. Intraoperative CT-based navigation consistently improved screw accuracy (up to 98.1%), reduced malposition and operative times and minimized radiation to staff. MRI influenced surgical decision-making in elderly and neurologically impaired patients, particularly by identifying occult cord compression and reducing surgical delay. Select studies reported functional gains, including ODI improvements from 67.1% to 25.6% and VAS pain reduction from 8.2 to 2.2. Advanced imaging modalities significantly enhance surgical precision and contribute to improved patient safety and recovery in cervical spine trauma. Their integration into surgical planning supports evidence-based, patient-centered care, especially in high-risk or anatomically complex cases.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Passias PG, Poorman GW, Segreto FA, Jalai CM, Horn SR, Bortz CA, et al. Traumatic fractures of the cervical spine: analysis of changes in incidence, cause, concurrent injuries, and complications among 488,262 patients from 2005 to 2013. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:427-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.011

Niemi-Nikkola V. Spinal fractures and spinal cord injuries: incidence, epidemiological characteristics and survival. 2021.

Godat L, Kobayashi L, Chang D, Coimbra R. Improving life expectancy: A 'broken neck' doesn't have to be a terminal diagnosis. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018;3(1):174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000174

Harris MB. Protect the neck: Devastating outcomes of cervical spine fractures in geriatric patients. Am J Surg. 2023;225(4):678-83.

Mead LB, Millhouse PW, Krystal J, Vaccaro AR. C1 fractures: a review of diagnoses, management options and outcomes. Current Rev Muscul Med. 2016;9:255-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-016-9356-5

Young CC, Chiarelli PA, Hofstetter CP. Injuries to the cervical spine. Principles of Neurological Surgery. Ellenbogen RG, Sekhar LN, Kitchen ND, Brito da Silva H (ed): Elsevier, Amsterdam. 2018;1:475-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-43140-8.00029-9

Sharif S, Ali MY, Sih IM, Parthiban J, Alves ÓL. Subaxial cervical spine injuries: WFNS spine committee recommendations. Neurospine. 2020;17(4):737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040368.184

Izzo R, Popolizio T, Balzano RF, Pennelli AM, Simeone A, Muto M. Imaging of cervical spine traumas. Euro J Radiol. 2019;117:75-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.05.007

Nyuon D. Test performance of cervical spine radiography as compared to computed tomography in diagnosing traumatic cervical spine injuries in adults with head injury at the Kenyatta National Hospital (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi). 2023.

Ghaffari-Rafi A, Peterson C, Leon-Rojas JE, Tadokoro N, Lange SF, Kaushal M, et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging to inform clinical decision-making in acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(21):4948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214948

Shahzad H, Saade A, Tse S, Simister S, Viola III A, Muthu S, et al. Advancements and challenges in computer-assisted navigation for cervical spine surgery: a comprehensive review of perioperative integration, complications and emerging technologies. Global Spine J. 2025;4:2192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251329340

Tarawneh AM, Haleem S, D’Aquino D, Quraishi N. The comparative accuracy and safety of fluoroscopic and navigation-based techniques in cervical pedicle screw fixation: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg: Spine. 2021;35(2):194-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.11.SPINE201877

Menta AK, Fuleihan AA, Li M, Azad TD, Witham TF. Enabling Technologies in the Management of Cervical Spine Trauma. Clin Spine Surg. 2024;37(9):459-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001709

Merritt B, Nahed BV, Benzil DL, Melnick ER, Ross JS, Desai S, et al. Changing utilization patterns of cervical spine imaging in the emergency department: perspectives from two decades of national Medicare claims. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(6):631-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.003

Kwon M, McLaughlin J, Kharbanda AB, Shah MN, Marin JR, Cohen DM, et al. Trends and variation in cervical spine imaging utilization across children's hospitals for pediatric trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024;97(3):1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004242

Kirnaz S, Gebhard H, Wong T. Intraoperative image guidance for cervical spine surgery. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(1):93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1101

Gierse, J, Mandelka E, Medrow A. Comparison of iCT-based navigation and fluoroscopic-guidance for atlantoaxial screw placement in 78 patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries. Euro Spine J. 2024;33:2304–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08232-7

Carl B, Bopp M, Pojskic M. Standard navigation versus intraoperative computed tomography navigation in upper cervical spine trauma. Int J Computer Assisted Radiol Surg. 2019; 14(1):169-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1853-0

Mansi Z, Rbai H, Zaidi B. Our experience with the surgical management of lower cervical spine fractures: fifty case series. Int Orthop. 2020;48:817–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-06076-2

Li YY, Chen SH, Huang KC, Lee CY, Cheng CC, Lee CY, et al. High accuracy and safety of intraoperative CT-guided navigation for transpedicular screw placement in revision spinal surgery. J Clin Med. 2022;11(19):5853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195853

Hecht AC, Koehler SM, Laudone JC, Jenkins A, Qureshi S. Is intraoperative CT of posterior cervical spine instrumentation cost-effective and does it reduce complications. Clin Orthop Related Res. 2011;469:1035-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1603-2

Lee JS, Son DW, Lee SH, Ki SS, Lee SW, Song GS. Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes of C1-2 fusion spine surgery between intraoperative computed tomography image based navigation-guided operation and fluoroscopy-guided operation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020;63(2):237-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2019.0172

Pourtaheri S, Emami A, Sinha K, Faloon M, Hwang K, Shafa E, et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in acute cervical spine fractures. The Spine J. 2014;14(11):2546-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.052

Wu MH, Dubey NK, Lee CY, Li YY, Cheng CC, Shi CS. Application of Intraoperative CT‐Guided Navigation in Simultaneous Minimally Invasive Anterior and Posterior Surgery for Infectious Spondylitis. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2(1):2302395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2302395

Chiu RG, Siddiqui N, Rosinski CL, Nallani A, Parola R, Behbahani M, et al. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on surgical approach and outcomes in the management of subaxial cervical fractures. World Neurosurg. 2020;138:169-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.060

Zhang H, Lin Y, Wu C, Cheng F, Bao D, Chen Y. Endoscopy-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with internal fixation vs conventional surgery in the treatment of cervical disc herniation. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024;1;19(3):59-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2024.17888

Fisher CG, DiPaola CP, Ryken TC, Bilsky MH, Shaffrey CI, Berven SH, et al. A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine. 2010;35(22):1221-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e16ae2

Kanter AS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. A treatment algorithm for the management of cervical spine fractures and deformity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;24(1):11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/FOC/2008/24/1/E11

Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Singh A, Cadotte D, Harrop JS, et al. Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PloS one. 2012;7(2):32037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032037

Yue JK, Winkler EA, Rick JW, Deng H, Partow CP, Upadhyayula PS, et al. Update on critical care for acute spinal cord injury in the setting of polytrauma. Neurosurg focus. 2017;43(5):19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.7.FOCUS17396

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

Jiménez-Sánchez, J., Cortés, D. A. G., Sánchez, N. A. F., Bravo, J. P. L., Vivas, J. C. A., Raza, N. B. O., Salvador, A. E. O., & Barreto, S. B. (2025). Optimization of surgical fixation in cervical spine fractures using advanced imaging techniques: a systematic review of functional and neurological outcomes. International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 11(4), 847–853. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251747

Issue

Section

Systematic Reviews