Functional outcome of distal femoral fractures treated with distal femoral locking compression plate: a cross-sectional study

Sandeep Kumar  Kumar Deep; Varun Phogat; Sankar Debroy

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20252635

Authors

Sandeep Kumar Kumar Deep Department of Orthopaedics, Agartala Government Medical College and G. B. Pant Hospital, Agartala, Tripura, India
Varun Phogat Department of Orthopaedics, Fortis Hospital, Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi, India
Sankar Debroy Department of Orthopaedics, Agartala Government Medical College and G. B. Pant Hospital, Agartala, Tripura, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20252635

Keywords:

Distal femur fractures, Functional outcome, Plate osteosynthesis

Abstract

Background: Despite advances in fixation techniques, distal femoral fractures still pose significant challenges for orthopedic surgeons. Effective treatment hinges on a detailed understanding of local anatomy, accurate clinical and imaging assessments, recognition of the fracture morphology, and the judicious choice of a fixation device suited to the particular case. Locking compression plates (LCPs), with their numerous advantages such as enhanced stability, fixed-angle screw locking, and minimal disruption to periosteal blood supply have proven to be highly effective in addressing these challenges and are especially valuable in osteoporotic bone.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care institution in Tripura between October 2016 and September 2019, comprising 60 patients with distal femoral fractures who underwent open reduction and internal fixation utilizing a distal femoral locking compression plate (DF-LCP). The functional outcome was assessed using Neer’s criteria.

Results: The study included 60 patients, of whom 42 were male and 18 were female. The majority of fractures (70%) were attributed to road traffic accidents. The mean duration for radiological evidence of fracture union was 17.2 weeks. According to Neer’s criteria, the final functional outcome of the knee was rated as excellent in 34 patients (56.7%), good in 20 patients (33.3%), fair in 5 patients (8.33%), and poor in 1 patient (1.67%).

Conclusions: Surgical fixation of distal femoral fractures with distal femoral LCP provides good functional outcome and is one of the best modalities of treatment available for these kinds of fractures especially in severely comminated and in osteoporotic cases.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Martinet O, Cordey J, Harder Y, Maier A, Bühler M, Barraud GE. The epidemiology of fractures of the distal femur. Injury. 2000;31(Suppl 3):C62-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(00)80034-0

Kirankumar GN, Sharma G, Farooque K, Sharma V. Locking compression plate in distal femoral intra articular fractures: our experience. Int Scholarly Res. 2014;372916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/372916

Kolmert L, Wulff K. Epidemiology and treatment of distal femoral fractures in adults. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53:957-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678208992855

Schandelmaier P, Gossling T, Partenheimer A, Krettek C. Distal fractures of the femur. Chirug 2002;73(3):1221-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-002-0583-5

von Keudell, Arvind, Shoji, Kristin, Nasr, Michael, et al. Treatment Options for Distal Femur Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30():S25-S27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000621

Neer CS, Grantham SA, Shelton ML. Supracondylar Fracture of the Adult Femur – A Study of One Hundred and Ten Cases. JBJS Am. 1967;49A(4):591-613.

Zlowodzki M, Williamson RS, Cole PA. Biomechanical evaluation of the Less Invasive Stabilization System, angled blade plate, and retrograde intramedullary nail for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18(8):494-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200409000-00004

Smith, Wade R. Locking Plates – TIPS and Tricks. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89(10):2298-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200710000-00028

Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS, Candal-Couto J, Green S, Hui AC. Biomechanical testing of locking compression plates: is distance between bone and implant significant? JBJS. 2007;38(3):358-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.08.058

Neer CS II, Grantham SA, Shelton ML. Supracondylar Fracture of the Adult Femur – A Study of one hundred and ten cases. JBJS Am 1967;49(4):591-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-196749040-00001

Brett D, Crist MD, Gregory J, Della Rocca, Yvnne M. treatment of acute distal femur Fractures. Orthopedics. 2008;31:681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20080701-04

Donald AW. Supracondylar and intracondylar fractures of the femur. In: Fractures in Adults. The Rockwood CA Jr and Green D (adults), 4th edn. Philadepphia, JB Lippincot; 1996:1973-1995.

Rajaiah D, Ramana Y, Srinivas K. A study of surgical management of distal femoral fractures by distal femoral locking compression plate osteosynthesis. J. Evid. Based Med. Healthc. 2016;3(66):3584-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2016/769

Virk JS, Garg SK, Gupta P, Jangira V, Singh J, Rana S. Distal Femur Locking Plate: The Answer to All Distal Femoral Fractures. JCDR. 2016;10(10):RC01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/22071.8759

Shriharsha RV, Sapna M. Utility and outcomes of locking compression plates in distal femoral fractures. Int J Res Orthop. 2015;1:15-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20160343

Erhardt JB, Vincenti M, Pressmar J, Kuelling FA, Spross C, Gebhard F, et al. Mid Term Results of Distal Femoral Fractures Treated with a Polyaxia Locking Plate: A Multi-Center Study. Open Orthop J. 2014;8:34–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001408010034

Yeap EJ, Deepak AS. Distal femoral locking plate fixation in distal femoral fractures. Malaysian Orthop J. 2007;1:12-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.0705.004

El Mwafya HM, El Gawadb MMA, El Dina AFS, Youssef WM. Surgical treatment of distal femoral fractures using a distal femoral locked plate versus a condylar buttress plate. Menoufi Med J. 2015;28:948–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-2098.173681

Seinsheimer F. Fractures of the distal femur. Clin Orthop. 1980;153:169-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198011000-00023

Mize RD, Bucholz RE, Grogan DP. Surgical treatment of displaced, comminuted fractures of distal end of femur. JBJS Am. 1982;64(6):871-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198264060-00009

Pritchett J.W.: Supracondylar fractures of the femur. Clin Orthop. 1984;184:173-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198404000-00027

Sah S, Karn NK, KC B, Yadav R, Dangi SJ, Adhikari AR. Outcomes of Surgical Management of Distal Femur Fracture with Distal Femoral Locking Compression Plate At Koshi Zonal Hospital. BJHS. 2017;2(3):260-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/bjhs.v2i3.18939

Patill SV, Magdum PB, Naik NP. Management of type a supracondylar fractures of femur with dynamic condylar screw (DCS). IJHBR. 2015;3(2):127-34.

Mulay S, Patel M, Gandhi D, Suri N. Comparative study of fracture lower 1/3 rd femur fixed by dynamic condylar screw and locking condylar plate. Int J Healthcare Biomed Res. 2016;4(03):98-102.

Dar GN, Tak SR, Kangoo KA, Halwai MA. Bridge plate osteosynthesis using dynamic condylar screw (DCS) or retrograde intramedullary supracondylar nail (RIMSN) in the treatment of distal femoral fractures: comparison of two methods in a prospective randomized study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009;15(2):148-53.

Giddie J, Sawalha S, Parker M. Retrograde nailing for distal femur fractures in the elderly. SICOT-J. 2015;1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2015034

Elmowafy HM, Hassan BZ, Nassar AM. Role of retrograde short nail in the treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures (extra-articular type A). Menoufia Med J. 2015;28(1):142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-2098.155970

Nayak RM, Koichade RM, Umre AN, Ingle MV. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using a locking compression plate for distal femoral fractures. J Orthop Surg. 2011;19(2):185-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900211

Padha K, Singh S, Ghani A, Dang H. Distal Femur Fractures and its Treatment with Distal Femur Locking Plate. JK Sci. 2016;18(2):76-80.

Gupta SV, Dande R. Surgical management of fracture of distal end of femur in adults by minimal invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) with locking condylar plate. Int J Orthop. 2015;1(2):07-11.

Sharma V, Gale R, Mansouri, Maqsood M. Use of Distal Femoral LCP in fractures of Distal Femur and Periprosthetic fractures – Functional and Radiological results in 41 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010;92:559-2010.

Kolb K. The condylar plate for treatment of distal femoral fractures: A long-term follow-up study. J Injury. 2009;440-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.08.046

Kim KJ, Lee SK, Choy WS, Kwon WC, Lee DH. Surgical Treatment of AO Type C Distal Femoral Fractures Using Locking CompressionPlate(LCP-DF). J Korean Fract Soc. 2010;23(1):20-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2010.23.1.20

Sanders R, Swintkowski M, Rosen H. Double-plating of comminuted, unstable fractures of the distal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:341-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199173030-00004

Rademakers MV, Kerkhoffs GM, Sierevelt IN, Raaymakers EL, Marti RK. Intraarticular fractures of distal femur-A long term follow up study of surgically treated patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(4):213-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200404000-00004

Rao DV. Clinical Study of Locking Compression Plate Fixation in Supracondylar Fractures of Femur in Adults. J Int Acad Res Multidisciplinary. 2015;3(6):372-80.

Girisha BA, Manchani S, Shah R, Muralidhar N. Outcome of distal femoral fractures treated with locking compression plates. Int J Res Orthop. 2017;12(5):112-6.

Sahu RL. Functional outcome following internal fixation of intraarticular fractures of the distal femur. Acta Orthopædica Belgica. 2015;83(2):215-22.